Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Guiding Networked Innovation Projects Towards Commercial Success—a Case Study of an EU Innovation Programme with Implications for Targeted Open Innovation

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to demographic change, public research funds have been directed to boost development of ambient assisted living solutions. This effort has been expected to create a market for information and communications technology (ICT)-enhanced products and services, which could support older adults in living independently for longer. However, the market for such products and services has developed rather slowly despite strong public investment, and the uptake of the developed solutions has not always met the high expectations (Eberhardt et al. 2010); hence, it seems to be difficult to deliver on the promise that ICTs will help mitigate the economic and social impact of demographic ageing. Therefore, two urgent questions need to be answered to tap the full potential of new technologies in demographic ageing: (i) what are the problems of public-private partnerships (PPPs) in commercializing ICT solutions in silver markets and (ii) how to support PPPs through policy and other measures to succeed. In this paper, we address these questions by analysing the case study based on the Ambient Assisted Living Joint Programme (AAL JP), which has reinforced market orientation of collaborative research and innovation projects through various types of activities. The paper presents a framework that is based on an analysis of commercialization needs and requirements of European networked innovation projects funded by the AAL JP. The data set was collected during business development workshops with 50 different project consortia representing 117 individual partners notably including users, researchers, SMEs, third-sector organizations and industrial partners. The resulting support framework covers (1) what can be done in ensuring that projects are initiated in a way conducive to successful commercialization, (2) what can be done during the execution of the project to support commercialization activities, and (3) how can project participants be supported after the financially supported collaboration phase. The analysis of the networked innovation projects financed through the AAL JP is also discussed from the viewpoint of targeted open innovation with policy implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Horizon 2020 SME instrument http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/sme-instrument

  2. FP7/Get Funded http://www.get-ehealth.eu/

  3. FP6/FP7 CoWin http://www.cowin4u.eu/public/cowin-consortium/Action

References

  • AAL JP (2014) Ambient Assisted Living Joint Programme. ICT for ageing well. http://www.aal-europe.eu/. Accessed 26 June 2015.

  • Agrawal, A. K. (2001). University-to-industry knowledge transfer: literature review and unanswered questions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(4), 285–302. doi:10.1111/1468-2370.00069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, S. A., & Latif, I. A. (2012). The effectiveness of public advisory services: what are the important factors? International Journal of Business and Management, 7(23), 19–30. doi:10.5539/ijbm.v7n23p19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bizan, O. (2003). The determinants of success of R&D projects: evidence from American–Israeli research alliances. Research Policy, 32(9), 1619–1640.

  • Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 627–655. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., Rimes, H., & Youtie, J. (2014). The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research: revisiting the contingent effectiveness model. Research Policy. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.06.008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branstetter, L., & Sakakibara, M. (2002). When do research consortia work well and why? Evidence from Japanese panel data. American Economic Review, 92(1), 143–159.

  • Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. (2010). Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate To Each Other? A Proposed Framework for a Trans-disciplinary Analysis of Sustainable Development and Social Ecology Compare and contrast TOI with responsible innovation. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 1(1), pp. 41–69.

  • Carayannis, E. G., & Rakhmatullin, R. (2014). The Quadruple/Quintuple Innovation Helixes and Smart Specialisation Strategies for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in Europe and Beyond. Journal of Knowledge Economy, 5(2), pp. 212–239.

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. booksgooglecom. Harvard Business Press. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/Open-Innovation-Imperative-Profiting-Technology/dp/1422102831. Accessed 20 June 2015.

  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, D. J., & Fischer, E. (2012). Publicly funded business advisory services and entrepreneurial outcomes. Research Policy, 41(2), 467–481. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, D., Fischer, E., & Peridis, T. (2014). Publicly funded business advisory services and entrepreneurial internationalization. International Small Business Journal. doi:10.1177/0266242614537849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defazio, D., Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2009). Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: evidence from the EU framework program. Research Policy, 38(2), 293–305. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G., Llerena, P., & Labini, M. S. (2006). The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: an illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called “European Paradox.”. Research Policy, 35(10), 1450–1464. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt, B., Fachinger, U., & Henke, K.-D. (2010). Better health and ambient assisted living (AAL) from a global, regional and local economic perspective. International Journal of Behavioural and Healthcare Research, 2(2), 172–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjalmarsson, D., & Johansson, A. W. (2003). Public advisory services - theory and practice. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 15(1), 83–98. doi:10.1080/0898562021000011205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsson, S., Lindholm-Dahlstrand, Å., & Elg, L. (2013). Is the commercialization of European academic R&D weak?—a critical assessment of a dominant belief and associated policy responses. Research Policy, 42(4), 874–885. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.01.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kask, S. (2012). Modes of open innovation in service industries and process innovation: a comparative analysis. In: C. de Pablos Heredero & D. Berzosa (eds.), Open innovation in firms and public administrations: technologies for value creation. Hershey: IGI Global

  • Kaufmann, A. & Tödtling, F. (2002). How effective is innovation support for SMEs? An analysis of the region of Upper Austria. Technovation, 22(3), pp.147–159.

  • Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259–280. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Kitson, M., Krabel, S., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: a review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petruzzelli, A. M. (2011). The impact of technological relatedness, prior ties, and geographical distance on university–industry collaborations: a joint patent analysis. Technovation, 31(4), 309–319.

  • Schwartz, M., Peglow, F., Fritsch, M., & Günther, J. (2012). What drives innovation output from subsidized R&D cooperation? Project-level evidence from Germany. Technovation, 32(6), 358–369. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2012.03.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State-aid treaty. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:12008E107. Accessed 25 June 2015.

  • Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ1.htm. Accessed 20 June 2015.

  • Von Schomberg, R. (2013). A vision of Responsible Research and Innovation. In R. Owen, M. Heintz, J. Bessant (Eds.) Responsible Innovation J. London: Wiley.

  • Wanzenböck, I., Scherngell, T., & Fischer, M. M. (2013). How do firm characteristics affect behavioural additionalities of public R&D subsidies? Evidence for the Austrian transport sector. Technovation, 33(2-3), 66–77. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2012.11.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. AAL Joint Programme, Brussels, Belgium

    Martin Jaekel

  2. Technical Research Centre of Finland VTT, Otaniemi, Finland

    Arto Wallin & Minna Isomursu

Authors
  1. Martin Jaekel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arto Wallin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Minna Isomursu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Jaekel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jaekel, M., Wallin, A. & Isomursu, M. Guiding Networked Innovation Projects Towards Commercial Success—a Case Study of an EU Innovation Programme with Implications for Targeted Open Innovation. J Knowl Econ 6, 625–639 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0274-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0274-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation