Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Business Incubators: Effective Infrastructures or Waste of Public Money? Looking for a Theoretical Framework, Guidelines and Criteria

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a wide literature about business incubators (BIs), especially about successful cases in high tech and knowledge intensive industries. Despite that, there is neither a viable integrative theory of effective business incubation nor clear guidelines about the preconditions for establishing BIs and their management. Such theory and guidelines are urgently needed because there is increasing evidence in the literature that, despite many successful cases and public policies supporting business incubation, most of BIs are not successful at all and serious doubts have emerged about the general effectiveness of business incubation and the advisability of investing public money in it. Based on a systematic literature review of the poor and scattered theoretical knowledge of effective business incubation, general principles are proposed to decide when a BI should be established and what it should do to be effective. The research is limited to non-profit BIs whose main goal is regional economic development as they represent the overwhelming majority of operating BIs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aernoudt R (2004) Incubators: tool for entrepreneurship? Small Bus Econ 23(2):127–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen D, McCluskey R (1990) Structure, policy, services, and performance in the business incubator industry. Entrepr Theory Pract 15(2):61–77

    Google Scholar 

  3. Abburrà L, Grandi A, Grimaldi R (2003) Il ruolo degli incubatori nella creazione di nuove imprese. Rosenber & Sellier, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  4. Asian Association of Business Incubators—AABI (2010) www.aabi.info. Last accessed 4 Dec 2010

  5. Association of German Business Incubators—ADT (2010) www.adt-online.de/homepage.html. Last accessed 4 Dec 2010

  6. Bearse Peter (1998) A question of evaluation: NBIA’s impact assessment of business incubators. Econ Dev Q 12:322–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bee E (2004) Small business vitality and economic development. Econ Dev J 3(3):7–15

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bergek A, Norrman C (2008) Incubator best practice: a framework. Technovation 28:20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bøllingtoft A, Ulhøi J (2005) The networked business incubator—leveraging entrepreneurial agency? J Bus Ventur 20(2):265–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Burnett H, McMurray A (2008) Exploring business incubation from a family perspective: how start-up family firms experience the incubation process in two Australian incubators. Small Enterp Res 16(2):60–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carayannis EG, von Zedtwitz M (2005) Architecting gloCal (global–local), real-virtual incubator networks (G-RVINs) as catalysts and accelerators of entrepreneurship in transitioning and developing economies: lessons learned and best practices from current development and business. Technovation 25(2):95–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Colombo M, Delmastro M (2002) How effective are technology incubators? Evidence from Italy. Res Policy 31:1103–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Corley K, Gioia D (2011) Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution. Acad Manag Rev 36(1):12–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Curley M, Formica P, Nicolò V (2011) From entrepreneurial fission to entrepreneurial fusion, achieving interaction resonance in a micro-innovation ecology. Ind High Educ 25(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  15. David R, Han S-K (2004) A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics. Strateg Manag J 25:39–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferguson R (2004) Why firms on science parks should not be expected to show better performance—the story of twelve biotechnology firms. Int J Technol Manag 28:470–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghoshal S, Moran P (1996) Bad for practice: a critique of the transaction cost theory. Acad Manag Rev 21(1):13–47

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gstraunthaler T (2010) The business of business incubators: an institutional analysis—evidence from Lithuania. Balt J Manag 5(3):397–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hackett S, Dilts D (2004) A systematic review of business incubation research. J Technol Transf 29:55–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hackett S, Dilts D (2004) A real options-driven theory of business incubation. J Technol Transf 29(1):41–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hackett S, Dilts D (2008) Inside the black box of business incubation: study B-scale assessment, model refinement, and incubation outcomes. J Technol Transf 33(5):439–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hansen M, Chesbrough H, Nohria N, Sull D (2000) Networked incubators. Hothouses of the new economy. Harv Bus Rev 78(5):74–84

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hughes M, Hughes P, Morgan RE (2007) Exploitative learning and entrepreneurial orientation alignment in emerging young firms: implications for market and response performance. Br J Manag 18(4):359–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jones R, Kashlak R, Jones A (2004) Knowledge flows and economic development through microenterprise collaboration in third-sector communities. New England J Entrep 7(1):39–48

    Google Scholar 

  25. Knopp L (2007) 2006 state of the business incubation industry. NBIA, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kučinskienė M, Fominienė A (2010) Verslo inkubavimo proceso transformacijos didejančios konkurencijos sąlygomis (Lithuanian). Curr Issues Bus Law 5:110–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Leblebici H, Shah N (2004) The birth, transformation and regeneration of business incubators as new organisational forms: understanding the interplay between organisational history and organisational theory. Bus Hist 46(3):353–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lender C, Dowling M (2007) The organisational structure of university business incubators and their impact on the success of start-ups: an international study. Int J Entrep Innov Manag 7(6):541–555

    Google Scholar 

  29. Luger Michael, Goldstein Harvey (1991) Technology in the garden. Research parks & regional economic development. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill

    Google Scholar 

  30. Maital Shlomo, Ravid Shmuel, Seshadri DVR, Dumanis Alon (2008) Toward a grounded theory of effective business incubation. Vikalpa: J Decis Makers 33(4):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  31. Markman G, Phan P, Balkin D, Gianiodis P (2005) Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. J Bus Ventur 20(2):241–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Monck CSP, Porter B, Quintas P, Storey DJ, Wynarczyk P (1988) Science parks and the growth of high-technology firms. Croom Helm, London

    Google Scholar 

  33. National Business Incubation Association—NBIA (2010) www.nbia.org. Last accessed 4 Dec 2010

  34. National Business Incubation Association—NBIA (2003) 2002 state of the business incubation industry. NBIA, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  35. Newbert S (2007) Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestion for future research. Strateg Manag J 28:121–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Oviatt B, McDougall PP (1994) Toward a theory of international new ventures. J Int Bus Stud 25(1):45–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Phillips R (2002) Technology business incubators: how effective as technology transfer mechanisms? Technol Soc 24:299–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Povilaitis M, Čiburienė J (2007) Paslaugų inovacijos ir jų įvertinimo galimybės (Lithuanian). Econ Manage 826–832

  39. Rennie M (1993) Global competitiveness: born global. McKinsey Q 4:45–52

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rice M (2002) Co-production of business assistance in business incubators: an exploratory study. J Bus Ventur 17(2):163–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Riddle L, Hrivnak G, Nielsen T (2010) Transnational diaspora entrepreneurship in emerging markets: bridging institutional divides. J Int Manag 16(4):398–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rothaermel F, Thursby M (2005) Incubator firm failure or graduation? The role of university linkages. Res Policy 34(7):1076–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Scaramuzzi Elena (2002) Incubators in developing countries: status and development perspectives. infoDev Program. The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  44. Schumpeter J (1942) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Unwin University Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  45. Siegel D, Westhead P, Wright M (2003) Science park and the performance of new technology-based firms: a review of recent U.K. evidence and an agenda for future research. Small Bus Econ 20:177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Singh R, Jain R (2003) Improving local economies through technology transfer: utilising incubators to facilitate cluster development. Int J Technol Transf Commer 2(3):249–262

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sternberg R, Behrendt H, Seeger H, Tamásy C (1997) Bilanz eines Booms—Wirkungsanalyse von Technologie- und Gruenderzentren in Deutschland, 2nd edn. Dortmunder Vertrieb für Bau- und Planungsliteratur, Dortmund

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tamàsy C (2007) Rethinking technology-oriented business incubators: developing a robust policy instrument for entrepreneurship, innovation, and regional development? Growth Change 6(3):460–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Todorovic Z, Suntornpithug N (2008) The multi-dimensional nature of university incubators: capability/resource emphasis phases. J Enterp Culture 16(4):385–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Tsai Fu-Sheng, Hsieh L, Fang S-C, Lin J (2009) The co-evolution of business incubation and national innovation systems in Taiwan. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 76(5):629–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. UK Business Incubation—UKBI (2010) www.ukbi.co.uk. Last accessed 4 Dec 2010

  52. United Nations—UN (2000) Best practice in business incubation. Economic Commission for Europe. United Nations, New York, p 27

  53. Westhead P, Storey DJ (1994) An assessment of firms located on and off science parks in the UK. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  54. Westhead Paul (1997) R&D “inputs” and “outputs” of technology-based firms located on and off science Parks. R&D Manag 27:45–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Nam Young-Ho (2000) The roles of incubator organizations in hi-tech venture creation in Korea. Asia Pacific J Manag 17(2):277–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Studies on Economic Development, University of Macerata, p.zza Oberdan n. 3, 62100, Macerata, Italy

    Ernesto Tavoletti

Authors
  1. Ernesto Tavoletti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernesto Tavoletti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tavoletti, E. Business Incubators: Effective Infrastructures or Waste of Public Money? Looking for a Theoretical Framework, Guidelines and Criteria. J Knowl Econ 4, 423–443 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0090-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0090-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation