Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Nordic Model of Work Organization

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are a number of international comparisons of work organization, where the Nordic countries emerge with the most widespread application of such ideas as freedom and learning in work. Two questions arise: first, what are the reasons? Second: what does it mean to apply ideas like freedom and learning in work? The intensive use of specialization as a strategy for productivity occurring during the first part of the previous century led, in the 1950s, to the emergence of initiatives to promote productivity through alternative forms of work organization. “Human relations”, “Quality of working life” and “Lean production” were the main movements to appear out of this turn. The Quality of working life movement, with its demand for a radical redesign of work roles, gained its strongest foothold in the Nordic countries. This article traces the points of origin of this development and provides an overview of the initiatives that have emerged over the years to promote freedom and learning in work. While the notion of “the good work” as work expressing freedom and learning has remained stable, ideas about how to create it have been subject to major changes. While the road to new forms of work organization was originally seen as the implementation of alternative criteria for job design, the ideas dominating today focus on learning, broad participation and a strong link between productivity and innovation. The ability to develop learning-oriented forms of work organization is strongly linked to the constructivist capacity of society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alasoini T (2011) Strategies to promote workplace innovation: A comparative analysis of nine national and regional approaches. In: Ekman IM, Gustavsen B, Asheim BT, Pålshaugen Ø (eds) Learning regional innovation: Scandinavian models. Palgrave-MacMillan, London, pp 253–273

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alasoini T, Lahtonen L, Rouhiainen N, Sweins C, Hulkko-Nyman K, Spangar T (2011) Linking theory and practice. Learning networks at the service of workplace innovation. Report 75, TYKES, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asheim BT (1996) Industrial districts as learning regions: a condition for prosperity? Eur Plan Stud 4(4):379–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Asheim BT (2011) Learning, innovation and participation: Nordic experiences in a global context with a focus on innovation systems and work organization. In: Ekman M, Gustavsen B, Asheim BT, Pålshaugen Ø (eds) Learning regional innovation: Scandinavian models. Palgrave-MacMillan, London, pp 15–49

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baker F, McEwan MPJM, Sheldon A (1969) Industrial organization and health. Tavistock, London

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bergh T (ed) (2010) Avtalt spill. LO-NHO, Oslo

  7. Blauner R (1964) Alienation and freedom. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bronner K, Levi L (1969) Stress i arbetslivet. Personaladministrativa Rådet, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brusco S (1996) Global systems and local systems. In: Cossentino F, Pyke F, Sengenberger W (eds) Local and regional response to global pressure. The case of Italy and its industrial districts. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies, Research Series 103: 90–111

  10. Burns T, Stalker GM (1961) Management of innovations. Tavistock, London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Edwards R (1979) Contested terrain: the transformation of the workplace in the twentieth century. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ejnatten, van F (1993) The paradigm that changed the workplace. van Gorcum, Assen

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ekman M, Gustavsen B, Asheim BT, Pålshaugen Ø (eds) (2010) Learning regional innovation. Scandinavian models. Palgrave-MacMillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  14. Emery FE (1959) Characteristics of socio-technical systems. Doc. No 527. The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. Emery FE (1974) Participative design. Center for Continuing Education, Australian National University, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  16. Emery FE, Thorsrud E (1969) Form and content in industrial democracy. Tavistock, London

    Google Scholar 

  17. Emery FE, Thorsrud E (1976) Democracy at work. Nijhoff, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  18. Engelstad PH, Ødegaard LA (1979) Participative design processes in Norway: Summarizing the first five years of a strategy to democratize working life. In: The International Quality of Working Life Council (ed) Working on the quality of working life. Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 327–338

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living- and Working Conditions (2007) Fourth European working conditions survey. Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gallie D (2003) The quality of working life: is Scandinavia different? Eur Sociol Rev 19(1):61–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gustavsen B (1983) Improving the work environment: a choice of strategy. Int Labour Rev 119(3):241–286

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gustavsen B (1992) Dialogue and development. van Gorcum, Assen

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gustavsen B (2007) Work organization and “the Scandinavian model”. Econ Ind Democr 28(4):550–571

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gustavsen B, Engelstad PH (1986) The design of conferences and the evolving role of democratic dialogue in changing working life. Hum Relat 39(2):101–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gustavsen B, Finne H, Oscarsson B (eds) (2001) Creating connectedness: the role of social research in innovation policy. John Benjamins, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gustavsen B, Hofmaier B, Ekman Philips M, Wikman A (1996) Concept driven development and the organization of the process of change. John Benjamins, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gustavsen B, Hunnius G (1981) New patterns of work reform: the case of Norway. The University Press, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  28. Herbst PG (1962) Autonomous group functioning and exploration in behaviour theory and measurement. Tavistock Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hvid H (2000) Dansk arbejdspolitiks gyldne tiår. Tidsskrift for Arbejdsliv 3(4):83–101

    Google Scholar 

  30. Johansson A (1978) Tillväxt och klassamarbete. Tiden, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  31. Johnstad T (2007) From a learning company to a learning region. In: Gustavsen B, Nyhan B, Ennals R (eds) Learning together for local innovation: promoting learning regions. Cedefop Reference Series 68. Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, pp 102–110

    Google Scholar 

  32. Latour B (1987) Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press, Harvard

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lewin K (1943) Forces behind food habits and methods of change. Bull Natl Res Counc CVIII:35–65

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lindholm R (1972) De fordömde ackorderna. Svenska Arbetsgivareföreningen, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lorenz E, Lundvall B-Å (2011) The organization of work and systems of labor market organization and social protection. In: Ekman M, Gustavsen B, Asheim BT, Pålshaugen Ø (eds) Learning regional innovation: Scandinavian models. Palgrave-MacMillan, London, pp 50–69

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lundvall B-Å (ed) (1992) National systems of innovation. Pinter, London

    Google Scholar 

  37. Meissner M (1971) The long arm of the job: a study of work and leisure. Ind Relat 10(3):239–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Naschold F (1993) Organization development: National programmes in the context of international competition. In: Naschold F, Cole R, Gustavsen B, van Beinum H (eds) Constructing the new industrial society. van Gorcum, Assen, pp 3–105

    Google Scholar 

  39. Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge creating company. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  40. Noteboom B (2006) Innovation, learning and cluster dynamics. In: Asheim BT, Cooke P, Martin R (eds) Clusters and regional development: critical reflections and explorations. Routledge, London, pp 137–163

    Google Scholar 

  41. Oscarsson B (1995) 25 år för arbetslivets förnyelse. Rådet för Arbetslivsforskning, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  42. Porter M (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  43. Qvale TU (1994) The case of the SBA: The Norwegian Work Life Center. A five year program on participation, productivity and institutional change (1988–93). In: Kauppinen T, Lehtonen M (eds) National action research programmes in the 1990s. Labour Policy Studies 86, Ministry of Labour, Helsinki, pp 157–176

    Google Scholar 

  44. Qvale TU (2011) Participative democracy and the diffusion of organizational innovation: The long, winding road from a plant level “field experiment” to regional economic development. In: Ekman M, Gustavsen B, Asheim BT, Pålshaugen Ø (eds) Learning regional innovation. Scandinavian models. Palgrave-MacMillan, London, pp 187–205

    Google Scholar 

  45. Roethlisberger F, Dickson WJ (1939) Management and the worker. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  46. SAF (1974) Nya arbetsformer: Rapport från 500 forsök. Svenska Arbetsgivareföreningen, Tekniska Avdelningen, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  47. SAF (1977) Arbete, teknik, miljø. Svenska Arbetsgivareföreningen. Tekniska Avdelningen, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sandberg T (1982) Work organization and autonomous groups. Liber, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  49. Senge PM (1992) The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. Massachussets Institute of Technology, Doubleday

    Google Scholar 

  50. Trist E, Bamforth KW (1951) Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting. Hum Relat 4:3–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D (1990) The machine that changed the world. Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bjørn Gustavsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gustavsen, B. The Nordic Model of Work Organization. J Knowl Econ 2, 463–480 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0064-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0064-5

Keywords

Navigation