Skip to main content
Log in

Why, When, and How are Real Options used in Strategic Technology Venturing?

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research is motivated by the role of real options as a risk management and uncertainty filtering methodology that helps minimize downside risk and maximize upside potential of a firm's investments. It seeks to answer “why, when and how are real options used in strategic technology venturing?” This research tests for the role of real options in decision making involving three types of firms in decreasing order of technology-dependence–technology-driven (where the profit is fully dependent on new technology creation and leveraging), technology-based (where the profit is enabled and supported by technology), and technology-neutral (where the profit is almost independent of technology). It also deals with strategic, tactical, and operational types of decisions driven by real options. Finally, this research assumes an environment (business ecosystem), where co-opetitive conditions trigger the use of real options (why), that serve to transform the position, posture, and propensity of businesses to innovate, and thus they co-evolve (when) into more effective and efficient forms of businesses (co-specialization) (how).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bowman EH, Hurry D (1993) Strategy through the option lens: an integrated view of resource investments and the incremental-choice process. Acad Manag Rev 18(4):760–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bushy JS, Pitts CGC (1997) Real options and capital investment decisions. Manag Account-London 75:38–39

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cantner U, Hanusch H (2001) Heterogeneity and evolutionary change: empirical conception, findings and unresolved issues. In: Foster J, Metcalfe JS (eds) Frontiers of evolutionary economics: competition, self-organization, and innovation policy. Edward Elgar, Aldershot, pp 228–269

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carayannis E (1994) The strategic management of technological learning: transnational decision making frameworks and their empirical effectiveness. Published PhD dissertation, School of Management, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carayannis EG (1998) The strategic management of technological learning in project/program management: the role of extranets, intranets and intelligent agents in knowledge generation, diffusion, and leveraging. Technovation 18(11):697–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carayannis EG (1999) Fostering synergies between information technology and managerial and organizational cognition: the role of knowledge management. Technovation 19(4):219–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carayannis EG (2000–2009) GWU SB lectures

  8. Carayannis EG (2008) Knowledge-driven creative destruction, or leveraging knowledge for competitive advantage strategic knowledge arbitrage and serendipity as real options drivers triggered by co-opetition, co-evolution and co-specialization. Ind High Educ 22(6):343–353

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carayannis EG (2009) Firm evolution dynamics: towards sustainable entrepreneurship and robust competitiveness in the knowledge economy and society. Int J Innov Region Dev 1(3):235–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carayannis EG, Assimakopoulos D, Kondo M (2008) Innovation networks and knowledge clusters. Palgrave McMillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (2006) Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters. Praeger, Westport

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ (2009) ‘Mode 3’and‘Quadruple Helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. Int J Technol Manag 46(3):201–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Carayannis EG, Gonzalez E, Wetter J (2003) The nature and dynamics of discontinuous and disruptive innovations from a learning and knowledge management perspective. In: Shavinnia LV (ed) The international handbook on innovation. Elsevier Science & Technology Books, North Holland, pp 115–138

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Carayannis EG, Kaloudis A, Mariussen Å (2008) Diversity in the knowledge economy and society: heterogeneity, innovation and entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cimoli M, Katz J (2003) Structural reforms, technological gaps and economic development: a Latin American perspective. Ind Corp Change 12(2):387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Copeland TE, Antikarov V (2001) Real options: a practitioner's guide. WW Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Creswell JW (2003) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  18. Drucker PF (1968) The age of discontinuity: guidelines to our changing economy. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hull J (2008) Options, futures, and other derivatives. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  20. Luehrman TA (1998) Strategy as a portfolio of options. Harvard Bus Rev 76(5):89–99

    Google Scholar 

  21. Merriam-Webster (Ed.) (2009) Merriam-Webster Online

  22. Moran P, Ghoshal S (1999) Markets, firms, and the process of economic development. Acad Manage Rev 24:390–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Porter ME (1990) Competitive advantage of Nations. Harvard Bus Rev 73:55–71

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schumpeter JA (1934) The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (originally published in German in 1911)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wysocki RK (2006) Effective software project management. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elias G. Carayannis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carayannis, E.G., Sipp, C.M. Why, When, and How are Real Options used in Strategic Technology Venturing?. J Knowl Econ 1, 70–85 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-010-0011-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-010-0011-x

Keywords

Navigation