Abstract
Assimilation systems absorb both satellite measurements and Argo observations. This assimilation is essential to diagnose and evaluate the contribution from each type of data to the reconstructed analysis, allowing for better configuration of assimilation parameters. To achieve this, two comparative reconstruction schemes were designed under the optimal interpolation framework. Using a static scheme, an in situ-only field of ocean temperature was derived by correcting climatology with only Argo profiles. Through a dynamic scheme, a synthetic field was first derived from only satellite sea surface height and sea surface temperature measurements through vertical projection, and then a combined field was reconstructed by correcting the synthetic field with in situ profiles. For both schemes, a diagnostic iterative method was performed to optimize the background and observation error covariance statics. The root mean square difference (RMSD) of the in situ-only field, synthetic field and combined field were analyzed toward assimilated observations and independent observations, respectively. The rationale behind the distribution of RMSD was discussed using the following diagnostics: (1) The synthetic field has a smaller RMSD within the global mixed layer and extratropical deep waters, as in the Northwest Pacific Ocean; this is controlled by the explained variance of the vertical surface-underwater regression that reflects the ocean upper mixing and interior baroclinicity. (2) The in situ-only field has a smaller RMSD in the tropical upper layer and at midlatitudes; this is determined by the actual noise-to-signal ratio of ocean temperature. (3) The satellite observations make a more significant contribution to the analysis toward independent observations in the extratropics; this is determined by both the geographical feature of the synthetic field RMSD (smaller at depth in the extratropics) and that of the covariance correlation scales (smaller in the extratropics).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agarwal N, Sharma R, Basu S, et al. 2007. Derivation of salinity profiles in the Indian Ocean from satellite surface observations. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 4(2): 322–325, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2007.894163
Alves J O S, Haines K, Anderson D L T. 2001. Sea level assimilation experiments in the tropical Pacific. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 31(2): 305–323, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2001)031<0305:SLAEIT>2.0.CO;2
An Yuzhu, Zhang Ren, Wang Huizan, et al. 2012. Study on calculation and spatio-temporal variations of global ocean mixed layer depth. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 55(7): 2249–2258
Antonov J I, Levitus S, Boyer T P. 2004. Climatological annual cycle of ocean heat content. Geophysical Research Letters, 31(4): L04304, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018851
Ballabrera-Poy J, Mourre B, Garcia-Ladona E, et al. 2009. Linear and non-linear T-S models for the eastern North Atlantic from Argo data: Role of surface salinity observations. Deep-Sea Research I, 56: 1605–1614, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2009.05.017
Carnes M R, Teague W J, Mitchell J L, 1994. Inference of subsurface thermohaline structure from fields measurable by satellite. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 11(2): 551–566
Chapnik B, Desroziers G, Rabier F, et al. 2004. Properties and first application of an error-statistics tuning method in variational assimilation. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 130: 2253–2275, doi: https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.03.26
Chapnik B, Desroziers G, Rabier F, et al. 2006. Diagnosis and tuning of observational error in a quasi-operational data assimilation setting. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 132(615): 543–565, doi: https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.102
Cooper M, Haines K. 1996. Altimetric assimilation with water property conservation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 101(C1): 1059–1077, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/95JC02902
Dee D P, da Silva A M. 1999. Maximum-likelihood estimation of forecast and observation error covariance parameters. Part I: Methodology. Monthly Weather Review, 127(8): 1822–1834, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127<1822:MLEOFA>2.0.CO;2
Desroziers G, Berre L, Chapnik B, et al. 2005. Diagnosis of observation, background and analysis-error statistics in observation space. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 131(613): 3385–3396, doi: https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.05.108
Desroziers G, Ivanov S. 2001. Diagnosis and adaptive tuning of observation-error parameters in a variational assimilation. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 127(574): 1433–1452, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712757417
Eden C, Willebrand J. 2001. Mechanism of interannual to decadal variability of the North Atlantic circulation. Journal of Climate, 14(10): 2266–2280, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<2266:MOITDV>2.0.CO;2
Fox D N, Teague W J, Barron C N, et al. 2002. The modular ocean data assimilation system (MODAS). Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 19(2): 240–252, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2002)019<0240:TMODAS>2.0.CO;2
Gaillard F. 2012. ISAS-Tool version 6: Method and Configuration. Plouzané, France: Ifremer Cnrs Ird Ubo
Gaillard F, Autret E, Thierry V, et al. 2009. Quality control of large Argo datasets. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 26(2): 337–351, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JTECHO552.1
Gaillard F, Reynaud T, Thierry V, et al. 2016. In situ-based reanalysis of the global ocean temperature and salinity with ISAS: variability of the heat content and steric height. Journal of Climate, 29(4): 1305–1323, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0028.1
Guinehut S, Dhomps A L, Larnicol G, et al. 2012. High resolution 3-D temperature and salinity fields derived from in situ and satellite observations. Ocean Science, 8(5): 845–857, doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/os-8-845-2012
Guinehut S, Le Traon P Y, Larnicol G, et al. 2004. Combining Argo and remote-sensing data to estimate the ocean three-dimensional temperature fields—A first approach based on simulated observations. Journal of Marine Systems, 46(1–4): 85–98
Guinehut S, Le Traon P Y, Larnicol G, et al. 2006. What can we learn from Global Altimetry/Hydrography comparisons?. Geophysical Research Letters, 33(10): L10604
Harrison D E, Carson M. 2007. Is the world ocean warming? Upper-ocean temperature trends: 1950–2000. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 37(2): 174–187, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO3005.1
Hollingsworth A, Lönnberg P. 1986. The statistical structure of short-range forecast errors as determined from radiosonde data. Part I: The wind field. Tellus A, 38(2): 111–136, doi: https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v38i2.11707
Larnicol G, Guinehut S, Rio M H, et al. 2006. The global observed ocean products of the French Mercator project. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on 15 Years of Progress in Radar Altimetry. Noordwijk, Netherlands: ESA
Lellouche J M, Greiner E, Le Galloudec O, et al. 2018. Recent updates to the Copernicus Marine Service global ocean monitoring and forecasting real-time 1/12° high-resolution system. Ocean Science, 14(5): 1093–1126, doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/os-14-1093-2018
Lellouche J M, Le Galloudec O, Drévillon M, et al. 2013. Evaluation of global monitoring and forecasting systems at Mercator Océan. Ocean Science, 9(1): 57–81, doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-57-2013
Maes C, Behringer D. 2000. Using satellite—derived sea level and temperature profiles for determining the salinity variability: A new approach. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 105(C4): 8537–8547, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC900279
Meinen C S, Watts D R. 2000. Vertical structure and transport on a transect across the North Atlantic Current near 42 N: Time series and mean. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 105(C9): 21869–21891, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC900097
Mitchell D, Wimbush M, Watts D, et al. 2004. The residual GEM technique and its application to the southwestern Japan East Sea. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 21(12): 1895–1909, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-1668.1
Nardelli B B, Guinehut S, Pascual A, et al. 2012. Towards high resolution mapping of 3-D mesoscale dynamics from observations. Ocean Science, 8(5): 885–901, doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/os-8-885-2012
Nardelli B B, Santoleri R. 2004. Reconstructing synthetic profiles from surface data. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 21(4): 693–703, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2004)021<0693:RSPF-SD>2.0.CO;2
Nardelli B B, Santoleri R. 2005. Methods for the reconstruction of vertical profiles from surface data: Multivariate analyses, residual GEM, and variable temporal signals in the North Pacific Ocean. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 22(11): 1762–1781, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1792.1
Reynolds R W, Smith T M, Liu Chunying, et al. 2007. Daily high-resolution-blended analyses for sea surface temperature. Journal of Climate, 20(22): 5473–5496, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1824.1
Roemmich D, Gilson J. 2009. The 2004–2008 mean and annual cycle of temperature, salinity, and steric height in the global ocean from the Argo Program. Progress in Oceanography, 82(2): 81–100, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2009.03.004
Saji N H, Goswami B N, Vinayachandran P N, et al. 1999. A dipole mode in the tropical Indian Ocean. Nature, 401(6751): 360–363
Servain J, Wainer I, McCreary J P, et al. 1999. Relationship between the equatorial and meridional modes of climatic variability in the tropical Atlantic. Geophysical Research Letters, 26(4): 485–488, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900014
Talagrand O. 1999. A posteriori verification of analysis and assimilation algorithms. In: Proceedings of the ECMWF Workshop on Diagnosis of Data Assimilation Systems. Reading, UK: European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Von Schuckmann K, Gaillard F, Le Traon P Y. 2009. Global hydrographic variability patterns during 2003–2008. Journal of Geophysical Research, 114(C9): C09007
Wu X, Yan X H, Jo Y H, et al. 2012. Estimation of Subsurface Temperature Anomaly in the North Atlantic Using a Self-Organizing Map Neural Network. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 29(11): 1675–1688, doi: https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00013.1
Funding
The National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract Nos 41706021 and 41976188.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, J., Yan, H., Bao, S. et al. Evaluating the contribution of satellite measurements to the reconstruction of three-dimensional ocean temperature fields in combination with Argo profiles. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 41, 65–79 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-021-1858-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-021-1858-3