Skip to main content
Log in

A statistical analysis of mesoscale eddies in the Bay of Bengal from 22–year altimetry data

  • Published:
Acta Oceanologica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Eddy properties in the Bay of Bengal are studied from 22 a archiving, validation and interpretation of satellite oceanographic (AVISO) data using a sea level anomaly (SLA)-based eddy identification. A geographical distribution and an eddy polarity, an eddy lifetime and propagation distances, eddy origins and terminations, eddy propagation directions and trajectories, eddy kinetic properties, the evolution of eddy properties, seasonal and interannual variabilities of eddy activities are analyzed in this area. Eddies exist principally in the western Bay of Bengal and most of them propagate westward. The polarity distribution of eddies shows cyclones prefer to occur in the northwest and south of the Bay of Bengal, while anticyclones mainly occur in the east of the bay. Five hundred and sixty-five cyclones and 389 anticyclones with the lifetime that exceeds 30 d are detected during the 22 a period, and there is a preference for the cyclones for all lifetime and propagation distances. The kinetic properties of all observed eddies show the average amplitude of the cyclones is larger than that of the anticyclones, whereas that is opposite for average radius, and their average velocities are basically the same. Moreover, the evolution of eddies properties reveals that the eddies with a long lifetime that exceeds 90 d have a significant double-stage feature of the former 50 d growth period and the dying period after 50 d. For the seasonal variability of the eddies, the cyclones occur more often in spring while the anticyclones occur more often in summer. The analysis of long-lived eddy seasonal distributions shows that there is the obvious seasonal variation of the eddy activities in the Bay of Bengal. The interannual variability of an eddy number shows an obvious negative correlation with the EKE variation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babu M T, Kumar P S, Rao D P. 1991. A subsurface cyclonic eddy in the Bay of Bengal. Journal of Marine Research, 49(3): 403–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babu M T, Sarma Y V B, Murty V S N, et al. 2003. On the circulation in the Bay of Bengal during northern spring inter-monsoon (March–April 1987). Deep-Sea Research: Part II. Topical Studies in Oceanography, 50(5): 855–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaigneau A, Gizolme A, Grados C. 2008. Mesoscale eddies off Peru in altimeter records: Identification algorithms and eddy spatiotemporal patterns. Progress in Oceanography, 79(2-4): 106–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chelton D B, Schlax M G. 2003. The accuracies of smoothed sea surface height fields constructed from tandem satellite altimeter datasets. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 20(9): 1276–1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chelton D B, Schlax M G, Samelson R M. 2011. Global observations of nonlinear mesoscale eddies. Progress in Oceanography, 91(2): 167–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Gengxin, Wang Dongxiao, Hou Yijun. 2012. The features and interannual variability mechanism of mesoscale eddies in the Bay of Bengal. Continental Shelf Research, 47: 178–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Xuhua, Xie Shangping, McCreary J P, et al. 2013. Intraseasonal variability of sea surface height in the Bay of Bengal. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 118(2): 816–830

    Google Scholar 

  • Doglioli A M, Blanke B, Speich S, et al. 2007. Tracking coherent structures in a regional ocean model with wavelet analysis: application to Cape Basin eddies. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 112(C5): C05043, doi: 10.1029/2006JC003952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dussurget R, Birol F, Morrow R, et al. 2011. Fine resolution altimetry data for a regional application in the Bay of Biscay. Marine Geodesy, 34(3–4): 447–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eigenheer A, Quadfasel D. 2000. Seasonal variability of the Bay of Bengal circulation inferred from TOPEX/Poseidon altimetry. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 105(C2): 3243–3252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker P, Firing E, Hummon J, et al. 1998. Bay of Bengal currents during the northeast monsoon. Geophysical Research Letters, 25(15): 2769–2772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isern-Fontanet J, García-Ladona E, Font J. 2003. Identification of marine eddies from altimetric maps. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 20(5): 772–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isern-Fontanet J, García-Ladona E, Font J, et al. 2006. Non-Gaussian velocity probability density functions: an altimetric perspective of the Mediterranean Sea. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 36(11): 2153–2164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Traon P Y, Dibarboure G. 2004. An illustration of the contribution of the TOPEX/Poseidon—Jason-1 tandem mission to mesoscale variability studies. Marine Geodesy, 27(1–2): 3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Traon P Y, Faugère Y, Hernandez F, et al. 2003. Can we merge Geosat follow-On with TOPEX/Poseidon and ERS-2 for an improved description of the ocean circulation?. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 20(6): 889–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Traon P Y, Nadal F, Ducet N. 1998. An improved mapping method of multisatellite altimeter data. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 15(2): 522–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lou Hao, Bracco A, Di Lorenzo E. 2011. The interannual variability of the surface eddy kinetic energy in the Labrador Sea. Progress in Oceanography, 91(3): 295–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams J C. 1990. The vortices of two-dimensional turbulence. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 219: 361–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nencioli F, Dong Changming, Dickey T, et al. 2010. A vector geometry- based eddy detection algorithm and its application to a high-resolution numerical model product and high-frequency radar surface velocities in the Southern California Bight. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 27(3): 564–579, doi: 10.1175/2009JTECHO725.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascual A, Faugère Y, Larnicol G, et al. 2006. Improved description of the ocean mesoscale variability by combining four satellite altimeters. Geophysical Research Letters, 33(2): L02611, doi: 10.1029/2005GL024633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penven P, Echevin V, Pasapera J, et al. 2005. Average circulation, seasonal cycle, and mesoscale dynamics of the Peru Current System: a modeling approach. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 110(C10): C10021, doi: 10.1029/2005JC002945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu Yun, Li Li. 2006. Review of study on upper ocean circulation in the Bay of Bengal. Advances in Marine Science (in Chinese), 24(4): 593–603

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadarjoen I A, Post F H. 2000. Detection, quantification, and tracking of vortices using streamline geometry. Computers & Graphics, 24(3): 333–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangrà P, Pascual A, Rodríguez-Santana Á, et al. 2009. The Canary Eddy Corridor: a major pathway for long-lived eddies in the subtropical North Atlantic. Deep-Sea Research: Part I. Oceanographic Research Papers, 56(12): 2100–2114, doi: 10.1016/j.dsr.2009.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarma Y V B, Rao E P R, Saji P K, et al. 1999. Hydrography and circulation of the Bay of Bengal during withdrawal phase of the southwest Monsoon. Oceanologica Acta, 22(5): 453–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schott F A, McCreary Jr J P. 2001. The monsoon circulation of the Indian Ocean. Progress in Oceanography, 51(1): 1–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somayajulu Y K, Murty V S N, Sarma Y V B. 2003. Seasonal and interannual variability of surface circulation in the Bay of Bengal from TOPEX/Poseidon altimetry. Deep-Sea Research: Part II. Topical Studies in Oceanography, 50(5): 867–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souza J M A C, de Boyer Montégut C, Le Traon P Y. 2011. Comparison between three implementations of automatic identification algorithms for the quantification and characterization of mesoscale eddies in the South Atlantic Ocean. Ocean Science, 7(3): 317–334, doi: 10.5194/os-7-317-2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreenivas P, Gnanaseelan C, Prasad K V S R. 2012. Influence of El Niño and Indian Ocean dipole on sea level variability in the Bay of Bengal. Global and Planetary Change, 80-81: 215–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinayachandran P N, Masumoto Y, Mikawa T, et al. 1999. Intrusion of the southwest monsoon current into the Bay of Bengal. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 104(C5): 11077–11085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Lisen, O’Brien J J, Yang Jiayan. 1991. On the remote forcing of the circulation in the Bay of Bengal. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 96(C11): 20449–20454

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jungang Yang.

Additional information

Foundation item: The National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No. 41576176; the National High Technology Research and Development Program (863 program) of China under contract No. 2013AA122803; the Project of ESA-MOST Dragon-3 Cooperation Programme.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, W., Yang, J. & Ma, Y. A statistical analysis of mesoscale eddies in the Bay of Bengal from 22–year altimetry data. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 35, 16–27 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-016-0945-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-016-0945-3

Key words

Navigation