Skip to main content
Log in

Runout prediction and dynamic characteristic analysis of a potential submarine landslide in Liwan 3-1 gas field

  • Published:
Acta Oceanologica Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A large number of submarine landslides with different scales have been identified in the canyon area of the submarine pipeline route of Liwan 3-1 gas field. There is still much chance that submarine slope failures would happen, and the following mass movement would present great risk to the submarine pipeline. In view of this, a numerical prediction method based on Eulerian-Eulerian two-phase flow model is introduced to simulate the mass movement of potential submarine landslides. The sliding soil and ambient water are respectively simulated by Herschel-Bulkley rheology model and Newtonian fluid model. The turbulence is simulated using the k-ε model. Compared with both the experiment data and Bing result, the two-phase flow model shows a good accuracy, and its result is more close to the actual situation; the dynamic coupling between soil and ambient water can be effectively simulated and the phenomena of hydroplaning and head detachment can be obtained. Finally, the soil movement of a potential submarine landslide is simulated as an example, according to the seismic profile in the canyon area. The result shows that the hydroplaning occurs during the movement process. The runout distance calculated by the two-phase flow model is 877 m, which is 27.1% larger than the Bing result. However, the peak front velocity of soil is relative small, with a maximum value of 8.32 m/s. The Bing program with a simple and rapid process can be used for a preliminary evaluation, while the two-phase flow model is more appropriate for an accurate assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bradshaw A S, Tappin D R, Rugg D. 2010. The kinematics of a debris avalanche on the Sumatra margin. In: Mosher D C, Moscardelli L, Shipp R C, et al., eds. Submarine Mass Movements and Their Consequences. Berlin: Springer, 117–125

  • Bruschi R, Bughi S, Spinazzè M, et al. 2006. Impact of debris flows and turbidity currents on seafloor structures. Norwegian Journal of Geology, 86: 317–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Canals M, Lastras G, Urgeles R, et al. 2004. Slope failure dynamics and impacts from seafloor and shallow sub-seafloor geophysical data: case studies from the COSTA project. Marine Geology, 213(1–4): 9–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Junren, Yang Muzhuang. 1996. Research on the potential factors for geologic hazards in South China Sea. Journal of Engineering Geology (in Chinese), 4(3): 34–39

    Google Scholar 

  • De Blasio F V, Elverhøi A, Issler D, et al. 2005. On the dynamics of subaqueous clay rich gravity mass flows-The giant Storegga slide, Norway. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 22(1–2): 179–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Blasio F V, Engvik L, Harbitz C B, et al. 2004. Hydroplaning and submarine debris flows. J Geophys Res, 109(C1): C01002, doi: 10.1029/2002JC001714

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng Wenke, Shi Yaohong, Chen Linghui. 1994. Research for seafloor landslide stability on the outer continental shelf and the upper continental slope in the northern South China Sea. Marine Geology and Quaternary Geology (in Chinese), 14(2): 81–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauer P, Elverhøi A, Issler D, et al. 2006. On numerical simulations of subaqueous slides: back-calculations of laboratory experiments of clay-rich slides. Norwegian Journal of Geology, 86: 295–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauer P, Kvalstad T J, Forsberg C F, et al. 2005. The last phase of the Storegga slide: simulation of retrogressive slide dynamics and comparison with slide-scar morphology. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 22(1–2): 171–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hance J J. 2003. Submarine slope stability [dissertation]. Austin: The University of Texas

  • Harbitz C B, Parker G, Elverhøi A, et al. 2003. Hydroplaning of subaqueous debris flows and glide blocks: analytical solutions and discussion. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108(B7): doi: 10.1029/2001JB001454

    Google Scholar 

  • He Ye, Zhong Guangfa, Wang Liaoliang, et al. 2014. Characteristics and occurrence of submarine canyon-associated landslides in the middle of the northern continental slope, South China Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 57: 546–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilstad T, Marr J G, Elverhøi A, et al. 2004. Laboratory studies of subaqueous debris flows by measurements of pore-fluid pressure and total stress. Marine Geology, 213(1–4): 403–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imran J, Harff P, Parker G. 2001. A numerical model of submarine debris flow with graphical user interface. Computers & Geoscience, 227(6): 721–733

    Google Scholar 

  • Imran J, Parker G, Locat J, et al. 2001. 1D numerical model of muddy subaqueous and subaerial debris flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 127(11): 959–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia Yonggang, Shan Hongxian. 2000. Investigation and study of slope unstability of subaqueous delta of morden Yellow River. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control (in Chinese), 11(1): 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Baohua, Li Xishuang, Zhao Yuexia, et al. 2005. Debris transport on the western continental slope of the OKINAWA trough: slumping and gravity flowing. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica (in Chinese), 36(1): 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Feng, Wu Shiguo, Sun Yunbao. 2010. A quantitative analysis for submarine slope instability of the northern South China Sea due to gas hydrate dissociation. Chinese J Geophys (in Chinese), 53(4): 946–953

    Google Scholar 

  • Locat J, Demers D. 1988. Viscosity, yield stress, remolded strength, and liquidity index relationships for sensitive clays. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 25(4): 799–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locat J, Lee H J. 2002. Submarine landslides: advances and challenges. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 39(1): 193–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald K A, Cosham A, Alexander C R, et al. 2007. Assessing mechanical damage in offshore pipelines-Two case studies. Engineering Failure Analysis, 14(8): 1667–1679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohrig D, Elverhoi A, Parker G. 1999. Experiments on the relative mobility of muddy subaqueous and subaerial debris flows, and their capacity to remobilize antecedent deposits. Marine Geology, 154(1–4): 117–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohrig D, Whipple K X, Hondzo M, et al. 1998. Hydroplaning of subaqueous debris flows. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 110(3): 387–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosher D C, Moscardelli L, Shipp R C, et al. 2010. Submarine mass movements and their consequences. In: Mosher D C, Moscardelli L, Shipp R C, et al., eds. Submarine Mass Movements and Their Consequences. Berlin: Springer, 1–8

  • Nadim F,Locat J. 2005. Risk assessment for submarine slides. In: Hunger O, Fell R, Couture R, et al., eds. International Conference on Landslide Risk Management. Aa Balkema: Vancouver, 321–334

  • Parker E J, Traverso C, Moore R, et al. 2008. Evaluation of landslide impact on deepwater submarine pipelines. Proc Offshore Technology Conf, Offshore Technology Conference. Houston

  • Sun Yongfu, Dong Lifeng, Pu Gaojun, et al. 2006. Stability analysis of slopes in the subaqueous delta of the Yellow River under storm wave loading. Journal of Engineering Geology (in Chinese), 14(5): 582–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Yunbao, Wu Shiguo, Wang Zhijun, et al. 2008. The geometry and deformation characteristics of Baiyun submarine landslide. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology (in Chinese), 28(6): 69–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Xiujuan, Wu Shiguo, Liu Xuewei. 2006. Factors affecting the estimation of gas hydrate and free gas saturation. Chinese J Geophys (in Chinese), 49(2): 504–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S G, Hu Hongrui. 2007. Risk assessment for submarine slope stability-hydroplaning. Final project report prepared for the Minerals Management Service under the MMS/OTRC cooperative research agreement 1435-01-04-CA-35515 task order 39323. Austin: The University of Texas

  • Xu Guohui. 2006. Study on the landslide of gentle-slope silty seabed under waves —A case of Yellow River subaqueous delta [dissertation] (in Chinese). Qingdao: Ocean University of China

  • Yang Jinghong, Wu Qiuyun, Zhou Yang. 2014. Engineering geological zoning and evaluation along the deep water segment of the pipeline route in LW3-1 gas field. China Offshore Oil and Gas (in Chinese), 26(2): 82–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Xiujuan, Xiu Zongxiang, Yan Xiangzhen, et al. 2009. 3D simulation of submarine pipeline impacted by dropped objects. Journal of Vibration and Shock (in Chinese), 28(11): 47–50, 69

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakeri A, Høeg K, Nadim F. 2009. Submarine debris flow impact on pipelines—Part II: numerical analysis. Coastal Engineering, 56(1): 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiuhong Xie.

Additional information

Foundation item: The National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No. 41206058; the National Science and Technology Major Project of China under contract No. 2011ZX05056-001-02; the Scientific Research Fund of the First Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration under contract No. GY0213G25.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiu, Z., Liu, L., Xie, Q. et al. Runout prediction and dynamic characteristic analysis of a potential submarine landslide in Liwan 3-1 gas field. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 34, 116–122 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-015-0697-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-015-0697-2

Keywords

Navigation