Skip to main content
Log in

Attribute reductions in object-oriented concept lattices

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Attribute reduction is one of the main issues in the study of concept lattice. This paper mainly deals with attribute reductions of an object-oriented concept lattice constructed on the basis of rough set. Attribute rank of object-oriented concept lattice is first defined, and relationships between attribute rank and object-oriented concepts are then discussed. Based on attribute rank, generating algorithm of object-oriented concepts is investigated. The object-oriented consistent set and object-oriented reduction of an object-oriented concept lattice are defined. Adjustment theorems of the object-oriented consistent set, and the necessary and sufficient conditions for a attribute subset to be an object-oriented consistent set of an object-oriented concept lattice are discussed. Then the object-oriented discernibility matrix of an object-oriented concept lattice is defined and its properties are also studied. Based on the object-oriented discernibility matrix, an approach to object-oriented reductions of an object-oriented concept lattice is proposed, and the attribute characteristics are also analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carpineto C, Romano G (2004) Exploiting the potential of concept lattices for information retrieval with CREDO. J Univers Comput Sci 10(8):985–1013

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Cole R, Eklund P, Stumme G (2003) Document retrieval for e-mail search and discovery using formal concept analysis. Appl Artif Intell 17(3):257–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Elloumi S, Jaam J, Hasnah A, Jaoua A, Nafkha I (2004) A multi-level conceptual data reduction approach based on the Lukasiewicz implication. Inf Sci 163(4):253–262

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Ganter B, Wille R (1999) Formal concept analysis. Mathematical Foundations. Springer, Berlin

  5. Gediga G, Duentsch I (2002) Modal-style operators in qualitative data analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE international conference on data mining, pp 155–162

  6. Hereth J, Stumme G, Wille R, Wille U (2000) Conceptual knowledge discovery and data analysis. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1867. Springer, Berlin, pp 421–437

  7. Hu K, Sui Y, Lu Y, Wang J, Shi C (2001) Concept approximation in concept lattice. In: Cheung D, Williams GJ, Q Li (eds) Knowledge discovery and data mining, proceedings of the 5th Pacific- Asia conference, PAKDD 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2035. Springer, London, pp 167–173

  8. Kang XP, Li DY, Wang SG, Qu KS (2013) Rough set model based on formal concept analysis. Inf Sci 222(10):611–625

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Kent RE (1996) Rough concept analysis: a synthesis of rough sets and formal concept analysis. Fundam Inf 27:169–181

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim M, Compton P (2004) Evolutionary document management and retrieval for specialized domains on the web. Int J Hum Comput Stud 60(2):201–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kryszkiewicz M (2001) Comparative study of alternative types of knowledge reduction in insistent systems. Int J Intell Syst 16:105–120

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuznetsov SO (2004) Machine learning and formal concept analysis. In: Eklund P (ed) ICFCA 2004. Lecture Notes in artificial intelligence 2961. Springer, Berlin, pp 287–312

  13. Leung Y, Wu WZ, Zhang WX (2006) Knowledge acquisition in incomplete information systems: a rough set approach. Eur J Oper Res 168(1):164–180

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Li JH, Mei CL, Cherukuri AK, Zhang X (2013) On rule acquisition in decision formal contexts. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 4(6):721–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li JH, Mei CL, Lv YJ (2013) Incomplete decision contexts: approximate concept construction, rule acquisition and knowledge reduction. Int J Approx Reason 54(2): 149–165

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Li LF, Zhang JK (2010) Attribute reduction in fuzzy concept lattices based on the T implication. Knowl Based Syst 23:497–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ma JM, Zhang WX, Wang X (2006) Dependence space of concept lattices based on rough set. In: 2006 IEEE international conference on granular computing, pp 20–204

  18. Maji P, Paul S (2012) Rough-fuzzy clustering for grouping functionally similar genes from microarray data. In: IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics, pp 1–14

  19. Maji P, Paul S (2011) Rough set based maximum relevance-maximum significance criterion and gene selection from microarray data. Int J Approx Reason 52(3):408–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Maji P, Paul S (2010) Rough sets for selection of molecular descriptors to predict biological activity of molecules. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 40(6):639–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Maji P, Pal SK (2010) Feature selection using f-information measures in fuzzy approximation spaces. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 22(6):854–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Maji P, Pal SK (2007) Rough set based generalized fuzzy C-means algorithm and quantitative indices. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B Cybern 37(6):1529–1540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Maji P., Pal SK (2007) Rough-fuzzy C-medoids algorithm and selection of bio-basis for amino acid sequence analysis. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 19(6):859–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mi JS, Wu WZ, Zhang WX (2004) Approaches to knowledge reductions based on variable precision rough sets model. Inf Sci 159(3-4):255–272

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Mi JS, Leung Y, Wu WZ (2010) Approaches to attribute reduction in concept lattices induced by axialities. Knowl Based Syst 23:504–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pagliani P (1993) From concept lattices to approximation spaces: algebraic structures of some spaces of partial objects. Fundam Inf 18:1–25

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Paul S, Maji P (2012) Gene ontology based quantitative index to select functionally diverse genes. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 1–17

  28. Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comput Inf Sc 11:341–356

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Pasquier N, Bastide Y, Taouil R, Lakhal L (1999) Ecient mining of association rules using closed itemset lattices. Inf Syst 24(1):25–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Skowron A, Rauszer C (1992) The discernibility matrices and functions in information systems. In: Slowinski R (ed) Intelligent decision support: handbook of applications and advances of the rough sets theory. Kluwer, Boston, pp 331–362

  31. Stumme G, Taouil R, Bastide Y, Pasquier N, Lakhal L (2002) Computing iceberg concept lattices with TITANIC. Data Knowl Eng 42(2):189–222

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Taylor PJ, Catalano ., Walker DRF (2002) Measurement of the world City network. Urban Stud 39(13):2367–2376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Valtchev P, Missaoui R, Godin R (2004) Formal concept analysis for knowledge discovery and data mining: the new challenges. In: Eklund P (ed) ICFCA 2004. Lecture Notes in artificial intelligence 2961. Springer, Berlin, pp 352–371

  34. Wei L, Qi JJ, Zhang WX (2008) Attribute reduction theory of concept lattice based on decision formal contexts, science in China. Ser F C Inf Sci 51(7):910C923

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Wille R (1982) Restructuring lattice theory: an approach based on hierarchies of concepts. In: Rival I (ed) Ordered sets. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 445–470

  36. Wolff KE (2001) A conceptual view of knowledge bases in rough set theory. In: Ziarko W, Yao YY (eds) Rough sets and current trends in computing 2000. Lecture Notes in computer science 2005. Springer, Berlin, pp 220–228

  37. Wu WZ, Zhang M, Li HZ, Mi JS (2005) Knowledge reduction in random information systems via Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. Inf Sci 174(3-4):143–164

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Wu WZ, Leung Y, Mi JS (2009) Granular computing and knowledge reduction in formal contexts. IEEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 21(10):461–1474

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yao YY (2004) Concept lattices in rough set theory. In: Dick S, Kurgan L, Pedrycz W, Reformat M (eds) Proceedings of 2004 annual meeting of the North American fuzzy information processing society (NAFIPS 2004),pp 796–801

  40. Yao YY (2004) A Comparative study of formal concept analysis and rough set theory in data analysis. In: Tsumoto S, Slowinski R, Jan Komorowski H, Grzymala-Busse JW (eds) Rough sets and current trends in computing 2004, LNAI 3066, Springer, Berlin, pp 59–68

  41. Yao YY, Chen YH (2004) Rough set approximations in formal concept analysis. In: Dick S, Kurgan L, Pedrycz W, Reformat M (eds) Proceedings of 2004 annual meeting of the North American fuzzy information processing society (NAFIPS 2004), June 27–30, pp 73–78

  42. Zhang WX, Wei L, Qi JJ (2005) Attribute reduction theory and approach to concept analysis. Sci China Ser F Inf Sci 48(6):713–726

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for their very constructive comments. This work was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 10901025) and the Special Fund for Basic Scientific Research of Central Colleges (CHD2012JC003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian-Min Ma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ma, JM., Leung, Y. & Zhang, WX. Attribute reductions in object-oriented concept lattices. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 5, 789–813 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-013-0214-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-013-0214-0

Keywords

Navigation