Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Primary Language of ancient battles

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Linguistic Geometry (LG) is a type of game theory for extensive discrete games scalable to the level of real life defense systems. This scalability is based on changing the paradigm for game solving: from search to construction. LG was developed by generalizing experiences of the advanced chess players. In this paper we embolden further a hypothesis that LG is an objective reality that existed long before the invention of the game of chess. We suggest that LG is a formal model of human thinking about armed conflict, a mental reality that existed for thousands of years. LG is a special purpose network-based language, a warfighting component of the Primary Language of the human brain. (Existence of the Primary Language was suggested by J. von Neumann in 1957.) Moreover, the origin of the warfighting component could be traced back for hundreds of thousands of years to the origin of human species. We suggest that the development of this model of the human brain was stimulated by constant hunting and fighting. In this paper we also discuss striking similarities and differences of the LG language and another biological coding system, the genetic code. A major part of this paper is devoted to the detailed LG-based analysis of the three battles of Hannibal demonstrating that the LG-based software will generate the same resource allocation, deception and courses of action as those reported by the historians. It appears that by the time of Hannibal, the LG component and, probably, the entire Primary Language, had already been developed to full capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anglim S, Jestice P, Rice R, Rusch S, Serrati J (2007) Fighting techniques of the ancient world: 3000 BC–500 AD. Thomas Dunn Books, St Martin’s Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Botvinnik MM (1984) Computers in chess: solving inexact search problems. Springer, New York

  3. Caddell JW (2011) Deception 101―primer of deception. US Army War College, Carlisle Barracks. http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/pub589.pdf

  4. van Creveld M (1985) Command in war. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crick F (1988) The genetic code. In: What mad pursuit: a personal view of scientific discovery, chap 8. Basic Books, New York, pp 89–101

  6. DARPA RAID program, IPTO (Information Processing Technology Office), 2004–2008. http://dtsn.darpa.mil/ipto/programs/raid/raid.asp

  7. Dodge T (1891) XIX. The Battle of Trebbia. December 218 B.C. Hannibal, Great Captains. Houghton Mifflin & Co., Boston

  8. Deheane S (2009) Reading in the brain: the science and evolution of human invention. Viking Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frith C (2007) Making up the mind: how the brain creates our mental world. Blackwell, Malden

  10. Fagan G (2005) Great battles of the ancient world, The Great Courses (on DVD). Lecture Transcript and Course Guidebook. The teaching Company

  11. Hopcroft J, Motwani R, Ullman J (2006) Introduction to automata theory, languages, and computation, 3rd edn. Addison Wesley, Boston

  12. Kott A (ed) (2004) Advanced technology concepts for command and control. Xlibris Corporation, Philadelphia

  13. Kott A (2007) Raiding the enemy’s mind. Military Information Technology, online edition. http://www.military-information-technology.com/article.cfm?DocID=2287, Dec 29, 2007

  14. Kott A, McEneaney W (eds) (2007) Adversarial reasoning: computational approaches to reading the opponent’s mind. Chapman & Hall/CRC, New York, p 355

  15. Livy TL (1965) The war with Hannibal. Books XXI–XXX of the history of Rome from its foundation. Penguin Classics, New York

  16. Linguistic Geometry Tools: LG-PACKAGE, with Demo DVD (2010) STILMAN Advanced Strategies. This brochure and 8 recorded demonstrations are also available at http://www.stilman-strategies.com

  17. Linguistic Geometry Workshop, with STILMAN’s Comments (2003) REPORT, Dstl, Ministry of Defence, Farnborough, UK, Feb 25–26, 2003

  18. Polybius (1922) The histories. The Loeb Classical Library, vol 2. William Heinemann, G.P. Putnam’s Sons, New York

  19. Stilman B (1975) Formation of the set of trajectory bundles. In: Botvinnik MM (ed) Appendix 1 to the book: On the Cybernetic Goal of Games. Soviet Radio, Moscow, pp 70–77 (in Russian)

  20. Stilman B (1993) A formal language for hierarchical systems control. Int J Lang Design 1(4):333–356

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stilman B (1993) A linguistic approach to geometric reasoning. Int J Comput Math Appl 26(7):29–58

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Stilman B (1993) Network languages for complex systems. Int J Comput Math Appl 26(8):51–80

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Stilman B (1994) Linguistic geometry for control systems design. Int J Comput Appl 1(2):89–110

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Stilman B (1994) Translations of network languages. Int J Comput Math Appl 27(2):65–98

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Stilman B (1997) Managing search complexity in linguistic geometry. IEEE Tran Syst Man Cybern 27(6):978–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stilman B (1997) Network languages for concurrent multi-agent systems. Int J Comput Math Appl 34(1):103–136

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Stilman B (2000) Linguistic geometry: from search to construction. Springer, Berlin

  28. Stilman B (2000) From games to intelligent systems. In: Proceedings of the second ICSC international symposium on engineering of intelligent systems, EIS’2000, June 27–30, 2000, University of Paisley, UK, pp 779–786

  29. Stilman B, Dyer D (1995) Linguistic Geometry for aerospace combat simulation: serial and concurrent agents. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on human–machine interaction and artificial intelligence in aerospace (HMI-AI-AS’95), Toulouse, France

  30. Stilman B, Yakhnis V (1999) Solving adversarial control problems with abstract board games and linguistic geometry (LG) strategies. In: Proceedings of the first symposium on advances in enterprise control, JFACC Program, DARPA, ISO, November 15–16, 1999, San Diego, CA, USA, pp 11–23

  31. Stilman B, Yakhnis V (2000) Adapting the linguistic geometry—abstract board games approach to air operations. In: Proceedings of the second symposium on advances in enterprise control, JFACC Program, DARPA, Information Systems Office, July 10–11, 2000, Minneapolis, MN, USA, pp 219–234

  32. Stilman B, Yakhnis V (2001) LG war gaming for effects based operations. STILMAN Advanced Strategies, Tech. Report to Rockwell and Boeing, July 2001

  33. Stilman B, Yakhnis V (2003) Linguistic geometry: new technology for decision support. In: Proceedings of the SPIE conference on enabling technology for simulation science VII, April 22–25, 2003, Orlando, FL

  34. Stilman B, Yakhnis V (2002) LG anti-CM defense project in September–December 2001. STILMAN Advanced Strategies, Final Report to Boeing with raw data and charts, 35 p, January 2002

  35. Stilman B, Yakhnis V, Umanskiy O (2000) Winning strategies for robotic wars: defense applications of linguistic geometry. Artif Life Robot 4(3)

  36. Stilman B, Yakhnis V, Umanskiy O (2002) Knowledge acquisition and strategy generation with LG wargaming tools. Int J Comput Intell Appl 2(4):385–409

    Google Scholar 

  37. Stilman B, Yakhnis V, Umanskiy O, Hearing J (2002) Operational level decision aids with LG-based tools. In: Proceedings of the SPIE conference on enabling technology for simulation science VI, April 1–5, 2002, Orlando, FL

  38. Stilman B, Yakhnis V, McCrabb M (2002) LG wargaming tool for effect based operations. In: Proceedings of the SPIE conference on enabling technology for simulation science VI, April 1–5, 2002, Orlando, FL

  39. Stilman B, Yakhnis V, Umanskiy V, Boyd R (2005) Adversarial reasoning and resource allocation: the LG approach. In: Proceedings of the SPIE conference on enabling technology for simulation science IX, Orlando, FL, USA, 2005

  40. Stilman B, Yakhnis V, Curry P, Umanskiy O (2005) Deception discovery and employment with linguistic geometry. In: Proceedings of the SPIE conference on enabling technology for simulation science IX, Orlando, FL, USA, 2005

  41. Stilman B, Yakhnis V, Umanskiy O, Boyd R (2005) Linguistic geometry for technologies procurement. In: Proceedings of the SPIE conference on enabling technology for simulation science IX, Orlando, FL, USA, 2005

  42. Stilman B, Yakhnis V, Umanskiy O, Boyd R (2005) LG based decision aid for naval tactical action officer’s (TAO) workstation. In: Proceedings of the SPIE conference on enabling technology for simulation science IX, Orlando, FL, USA, 2005

  43. Stilman B, Yakhnis V, Umanskiy O (2007) Chapter 3.3. Strategies in large scale problems. In: Kott A, McEneaney W (eds) Adversarial reasoning: computational approaches to reading the opponent’s mind, Chapman & Hall/CRC, New York, pp 251–285

  44. Stilman B, Yakhnis V, Umanskiy O (2009) Linguistic geometry: theory and experiments. In: Proceedings of the third international workshop on AI in science and technology, AISAT’2009, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, 2009, p 6

  45. Stilman B, Yakhnis V, Umanskiy O (2010) Linguistic geometry: the age of maturity. J Adv Comput Intell Intell Inform 14(6):684–699

    Google Scholar 

  46. Stilman B, Yakhnis V, Umanskiy O, Boyd R, Pugachev V, Hagen L (2010) LG-PACKAGE: New Frontier, Polibits, no. 42, pp 5–12

  47. Stilman B, Yakhnis V, Umanskiy O (2010) Discovering role of linguistic geometry. In: Proceedings of the ninth Mexican international conference on AI, MICAI’2010, Part II, LNAI 6438, Springer, Berlin, pp 1–21

  48. Stilman B, Yakhnis V, Umanskiy O (2010) Revisiting history with linguistic geometry. ISAST Trans Comput Intell Syst 2(2):22–38

    Google Scholar 

  49. Stilman B (2011) Linguistic geometry and evolution of intelligence. ISAST Trans Comput Intell Syst (accepted)

  50. Von Neumann J (1958) The computer and the brain. Yale University Press, New Haven

  51. Warry J (1998) Warfare in the classical world. Salamander Books Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia; Hannibal, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannibal

  53. Yakhnis V, Stilman B (1995) Foundations of linguistic geometry: complex systems and winning conditions. In: Proceedings of the first world congress on intelligent manufacturing processes and systems (IMP&S), February 1995

  54. Yakhnis V, Stilman B (1995) A multi-agent graph-game approach to theoretical foundations of linguistic geometry. In: Proceedings of the second world conference on the fundamentals of artificial intelligence (WOCFAI 95), Paris, France, July 1995

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by STILMAN Advanced Strategies, LLC under internal R&D. Since 1999, development and improvement of the LG tools was also supported by the US Department of Defense, the UK Ministry of Defence, The Boeing Corp. (USA), BAE Systems (UK), SELEX Galileo (UK, a Finmeccanica company) and others.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boris Stilman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stilman, B., Yakhnis, V. & Umanskiy, O. The Primary Language of ancient battles. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 2, 157–176 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-011-0029-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-011-0029-9

Keywords

Navigation