Skip to main content
Log in

Brain Water Content: a Misunderstood Measurement?

  • Brief Communications
  • Published:
Translational Stroke Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Brain edema is a major contributor to poor outcome following ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. In animal models, edema has historically been quantified as a change in brain water content expressed as a percentage of wet weight (% water content). As described in this communication, this number can be misleading, as “small” changes in percentage of brain water content actually reflect much bigger changes in brain swelling. Using either water content, expressed as grams per gram of dry weight, or a measure of brain swelling better reflect the impact of edema after stroke and brain injury.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Adachi M, Feigin I. Cerebral oedema and the water content of normal white matter. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1966;29(5):446–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Faas FH, Ommaya AK. Brain tissue electrolytes and water content in experimental concussion in the monkey. J Neurosurg. 1968;28(2):137–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Marshall LF, Bruce DA, Graham DI, Langfitt TW. Alterations in behavior, brain electrical activity, cerebral blood flow, and intracranial pressure produced by triethyl tin sulfate induced cerebral edema. Stroke. 1976;7(1):21–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Betz AL, Keep RF, Beer ME, Ren XD. Blood–brain barrier permeability and brain concentration of sodium, potassium, and chloride during focal ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1994;14(1):29–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wagner KR, Xi G, Hua Y, Kleinholz M, de Courten-Myers GM, Myers RE, et al. Lobar intracerebral hemorrhage model in pigs: rapid edema development in perihematomal white matter. Stroke. 1996;27(3):490–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gerriets T, Stolz E, Walberer M, Muller C, Kluge A, Bachmann A, et al. Noninvasive quantification of brain edema and the space-occupying effect in rat stroke models using magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke. 2004;35(2):566–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Minamisawa H, Terashi A, Katayama Y, Kanda Y, Shimizu J, Shiratori T, et al. Brain eicosanoid levels in spontaneously hypertensive rats after ischemia with reperfusion: leukotriene C4 as a possible cause of cerebral edema. Stroke. 1988;19(3):372–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shohami E, Novikov M, Mechoulam R. A nonpsychotropic cannabinoid, HU-211, has cerebroprotective effects after closed head injury in the rat. J Neurotrauma. 1993;10(2):109–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao F, Hua Y, He Y, Keep RF, Xi G. Minocycline-induced attenuation of iron overload and brain injury after experimental intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2011;42(12):3587–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tsunoda A, Mitsuoka H, Bandai H, Endo T, Arai H, Sato K. Intracranial cerebrospinal fluid measurement studies in suspected idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, secondary normal pressure hydrocephalus, and brain atrophy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73(5):552–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grants NS034709 (RFK), NS039866 (GX), and NS057539 (YH) and a grant from the American Heart Association, 0840016N. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or the AHA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard F. Keep.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keep, R.F., Hua, Y. & Xi, G. Brain Water Content: a Misunderstood Measurement?. Transl. Stroke Res. 3, 263–265 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-012-0152-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-012-0152-2

Keywords

Navigation