Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intracoronary adenosine-induced ventricular arrhythmias during fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement: case series and literature review

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is a standardized and well-established method frequently used in clinical practice to evaluate the hemodynamic significance of epicardial coronary stenosis identified by coronary angiography. It is based on the change in the pressure gradient across the stenosis after the achievement of maximal hyperemia of the coronary circulation which is commonly induced by intravenous (IV) or intracoronary (IC) administration of adenosine. Here, we have described three cases of IC adenosine-induced ventricular arrhythmias during FFR measurement from our institution, and after literature review we found that all the cases of ventricular arrhythmias induced by adenosine during FFR measurement were observed where it was administered via IC route. Although a causal relationship between the use of IC adenosine during FFR measurement and the induction of ventricular arrhythmias is not yet established, we suggest using IV adenosine as the preferred route of administration until we better understand the incidence and mechanism underlying this phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pijls NH, Van Gelder B, Van der Voort P, et al. Fractional flow reserve: a useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation. 1995;92:3183–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Raffaele P, Tullio N, Giuseppe G, et al. Adenosine-induced torsade de pointes complicating a fractional flow reserve measurement in a right coronary artery intermediate stenosis. Cardiovasc Revascularization Med. 2013;14:118–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shah AH, Chan W, Seidelin PH. Ventricular fibrillation precipitated by intracoronary adenosine during fractional flow reserve assessment: a cautionary tale. Heart Lung Circ. 2015;11:e173–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention (FAME 1 study). N Engl J Med. 2009;360:213–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eric JT, Paul ST. Textbook of interventional cardiology. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2016.

  6. Vrolix M, Piessens J, De Geest H. Torsades de pointes after intracoronary papaverine. Eur Heart J. 1991;12:273–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nakayama M, Tanaka N, Sakoda K, et al. Papaverine-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia during coronary flow reserve study of patients with moderate coronary artery disease. Circ J. 2015;79:530–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Takeshi N, Yoshihide F, Yoshio K. Efficacy of combined administration of intracoronary papaverine and intravenous adenosine 5′-triphosphate in assessment of fractional flow reserve. Circ J. 2014;130:A14685.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Van der Voort PH, Van Hagen E, Hendrix G, et al. Comparison of intravenous adenosine to intracoronary papaverine for calculation of pressure-derived fractional flow reserve. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1996;39:120–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leone AM, Porto I, De Caterina AR, et al. Maximal hyperemia in the assessment of fractional flow reserve: intracoronary adenosine versus intracoronary sodium nitroprusside versus intravenous adenosine: the NASCI (Nitroprussiato versus Adenosinanelle Stenosi Coronariche Intermedie) study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:402–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. De Luca G, Venegoni L, Iorio S, et al. Effects of increasing doses of intracoronary adenosine on the assessment of fractional flow reserve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:1079–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Adjedj J, Toth GG, Johnson NP, et al. Intracoronary adenosine. Dose-response relationship with hyperemia. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2015;8:1422–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Belardinelli L, Linden J, Berne RM. The cardiac effects of adenosine. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1989;32:73–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schlundt C, Bietau C, Klinghammer L, et al. Comparison of intracoronary versus intravenous administration of adenosine for measurement of coronary fractional flow reserve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:e001781.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, et al. Fractional flow reserve–guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease (FAME 2 study). N Engl J Med. 2012;367:991–1001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bech GJW, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial (DEFER study). Circulation. 2001;103:2928–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goldberg S, Greenspon AJ, Urban PL, et al. Reperfusion arrhythmia: a marker of restoration of antegrade flow during intracoronary thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1983;105:26–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Belhassen B, Pelleg A, Shoshani D, Laniado S. Atrial fibrillation induced by adenosine triphosphate. Am J Cardiol. 1984;53:1405–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, New York Medical College, Saint Joseph’s Regional Medical Center, 703 Main St., Paterson, NJ, 07503, USA

    Hiten R. Patel, Priyank Shah, Sharad Bajaj, Hartaj Virk, Mahesh Bikkina & Fayez Shamoon

Authors
  1. Hiten R. Patel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Priyank Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sharad Bajaj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hartaj Virk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mahesh Bikkina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fayez Shamoon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiten R. Patel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

Statement of human rights For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Statement on the welfare of animals This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patel, H.R., Shah, P., Bajaj, S. et al. Intracoronary adenosine-induced ventricular arrhythmias during fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement: case series and literature review. Cardiovasc Interv and Ther 32, 374–380 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-016-0427-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-016-0427-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation