Abstract
Availability of genetic diversity is important in selecting suitable cultivars for crop improvement. Progenies of crosses between 19 farmer-preferred cassava landraces and Cassava Mosaic Disease (CMD)-resistant cultivar TME 11 were evaluated and compared with their maternal parents to assess their genetic variability and genetic gains based on CMD tolerance, some growth variables and root yield. The combined analysis of variance for the traits showed significant genotypic differences amongst the progenies and the parents. Apart from a few instances, the differences in replications and years were also significant. Genetic variability components showed high heritability ranging from 92.3 to 99.6% and moderately high genetic gains of 54.1 to 99.6% for the parental cultivars. Apart from canopy spread and plant height, heritability and genetic gains of the progenies were slightly lower than the parents indicating high variability within families of the progenies. The phenotypic coefficient of variation was slightly greater than genotypic coefficient of variation indicating minimal influence of environment on the genotypes. For most of the characters evaluated, the mean performance of the progenies was higher than their corresponding parental lines. Although the genotypes differed significantly (P < 0.001) for all traits evaluated, cultivars such as Afebankye, Bosome nsia, Cedi bankye, 262 Debor, Kwadaso 25, Nkaakom 57 and Sisipe were found to constitute a pool of germplasm with adequate variability. The negative correlation between CMD incidence and other traits evaluated showed significant progress made in the breeding program.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aina FA. 2007. Genetic variability in cassava as influenced by root yield in Nigeria. J. Biol. Sci. 7: 765–770
Akinwale MG, Akinyele BO, Dixon AGO, Odiyi AC. 2010. Genetic variability among forty-three cassava genotypes in three agro-ecological zones of Nigeria. J. Plant Breed. Crop Sci. 2: 104–109
Akinyele BO, and Odiyi AC. 2007. Comparative study of vegetative morphology and the existing taxonomic status of Aloe vera L. J. Plant Sci. 2: 558–563
Allard RW. 1960. Principles of Plant Breeding. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, pp 485
Asante IK, Dixon AGO. 2006. Field screening of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) germplasm for desirable traits by the use of augmented design. West Afr. J. Ecol. 10: 1–8
Bhateria S, Sood SP, Pathania A. 2006. Genetic analysis of quantitative traits across environments in Linseed (Linum usitatisimum L.). Euphytica 150: 185–194
Boster JS. 1984. Classification, cultivation and selection of Aguaruna cultivars of Manihot esculenta (Euphorbiaceae). Adv. Econ. Bot. 1: 34–47
Burton GW, De Vane EH. 1953. Estimating heritability in tall Fescus from replicated clonal material. Agric. J. 45: 478–481
Ceccarelli S, Erskine W, Haublin J, Grando S. 1994. Genotype x environment interaction and international breeding programme. Exp. Agric. 30: 177–187
Cock JH. 1985. Cassava: New Potential for a Neglected Crop. West View Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA, pp 191
De Vries J, Toenniessen G. 2001. Securing the harvest. Biotechnology, Breeding and Seed Systems for African Crops. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK
Edwards ML, Cooper J. 1985. Plant virus detection using a new form of indirect ELISA. J. Virol. Methods 11: 309–319
Food and Agricultural Organisation Statistics (FAOSTAT). 2011. FAOSTAT database. Available at http://apps.fao.org/faostsat
Hughes JDA, Thomas BJ. 1988. The use of protein A-sandwich ELISA as a means for quantifying serological relationship between members of the tobamovirus group. Ann. Appl. Biol. 112: 117–126
Gyawali S, Bhandari B, Subedi A. 2002. Farmer-Led Participatory Maize Breeding in Middle Hills of Nepal. Final report of Second Phase of the Project (August 2001–Sept., 2002). Local Initiatives for Biodiversity Research and Development (Li-BIRD), Pokhara, Nepal
Hahn, SK, Bai, KV, Asiedu R. 1990. Tetraploids, triploids and 2n pollen from diploid interspecific crosses with cassava. Theor. Appl. Genet. 79: 437–439
Hillocks RJ. 2002. Cassava in Africa. In Cassava: Biology, Production and Utilization, pp 67–89, Eds RJ Hillocks, AB Bellotti and JM Thresh. CAB International. Wallingford, UK
Lebot V, Aradhya KM. 1991. Isozyme variation in taro (Colocasia esculenta (L). Schott) from Asia and Oceania. Euphytica 56: 55–66
Manu-Aduening JA. 2005. Participatory breeding for superi or mosaic-resistant cassava in Ghana. Doctoral Thesis, University of Greenwich, UK, pp 346
Manu-Aduening JA, Lamboll RI, Dankyi AA, Gibson R. 2005. Cassava diversity in Ghanaian traditional farming systems. Euphytica 144: 331–340
Manu-Aduening JA, Lamboll RI, Ampong MG, Lamptey JN, Moses E, Dankyi AA, Gibson RW. 2006. Development of superior cassava cultivars in Ghana by farmers and scientists: The process adopted, outcomes and contributions and changing roles of different stakeholders. Euphytica 150: 47–61
Nassar, NMA, Graciano-Ribeiro D, Gomes PF, Hashimoto DYC. 2008. Alteration of reproductive system in a polyploidized cassava interspecific hybrid. Genet. Mol. Res. 7: 276–283
Nweke F. 2004. New challenges in the cassava transformation, in Nigeria and Ghana, Discussion paper series No. 118, Environmental and Production Technology Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC
Nweke FI, Dixon AGO, Asiedu R, Folayan SA. 1994. Attributes of cassava varieties derived by farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. In MO Akoroda, ed, Root Crops for Food Security in Africa. Proceedings of the 5th Triennial Symposium of the International Society for Tropical Root Crops-African Branch (ISTRC-AB), 22–28 November, 1992, Kampala, Uganda, pp 65–92
Nweke FI, Haleegoah J, Dixon AGO, Ajobo BO, Ugwu BO, Al-Hassan R. 1999. Cassava production in Ghana: A function of market demand and farmer access to improved production and processing technologies. Collaborative Study of Cassava in Africa (COSCA) working paper No. 21
Okai E. 2001. Genetic diversity in some local cassava cultivars in Ghana. MSc. Thesis, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana, pp 88
Oslen KM, Schaal BA. 1999. Evidence on the origin of cassava: phylogeography of Manihot esculenta. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 5586–5591
SAS Institute. 1999. SAS/STAT User’s Guide 8. Version, SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC
Singh GN, Prasad R, Upadhyaya LN. 2001. A general class of chain type estimators using two auxiliary variables in two phase sampling. Acta Ciencia Indica, Vol XXVIIM, No. 4, pp 549–553
Singh HP, Uma S. 2000. Genetic diversity of banana in India. In HP Singh, KL Chadha, eds, The proceedings of the conference of Banana Production and Utilization in 21st Century. Eds, pp 136–156
Sthapit B, Joshi K, Gyawali S, Subedi A, Shreatha K, Chaudhary P, Rana R, Rijal D, Upadhyaya M, Jarvis D. 2002. Participatory plant breeding: setting breeding goals and choosing parents for on-farm conservation. In: MR Bellon, J Reeves, eds, Quantitative Analysis of Data from Participatory Methods in Plant Breeding. CIMMYT, Mexico. pp 104–112
Thresh JM, Fargette D, Otim-Nape GW. 1994. Effects of African Cassava Mosaic geminivirus on yield of cassava. Trop. Sci. 34: 26–42
Virk DS, Singh DN, Prasad SC, Gangwar JS, Witcombe JR. 2003. Collaborative and consultative participatory plant breeding of rice for the rainfed uplands of eastern India. Euphytica 132: 95–108
Witcombe JR, Gyawali S, Sunwar S, Sthapit BR, Joshi KD. 2006. Participatory plant breeding is better described as highly client-oriented plant breeding. II. Optional farmer collaboration in the segregating generations. Exp. Agric. 42: 79–90
Witcombe JR, Virk DS. 2001. Number of crosses and population size for participatory and classical plant breeding. Euphytica 122: 451–462
Wu KK, Heinz J, Meyer HK, Ladd SL. 1978. Minimum sample size for the estimating progeny mean and variance. Crop Sci. 18: 57–62
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Manu-Aduening, J.A., Peprah, B.B. & Agyeman, A. Genetic variability of cassava progenies developed through introgression of cassava mosaic disease resistance into Ghanaian landraces. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 16, 23–28 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-012-0053-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-012-0053-7