Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic variability of cassava progenies developed through introgression of cassava mosaic disease resistance into Ghanaian landraces

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Availability of genetic diversity is important in selecting suitable cultivars for crop improvement. Progenies of crosses between 19 farmer-preferred cassava landraces and Cassava Mosaic Disease (CMD)-resistant cultivar TME 11 were evaluated and compared with their maternal parents to assess their genetic variability and genetic gains based on CMD tolerance, some growth variables and root yield. The combined analysis of variance for the traits showed significant genotypic differences amongst the progenies and the parents. Apart from a few instances, the differences in replications and years were also significant. Genetic variability components showed high heritability ranging from 92.3 to 99.6% and moderately high genetic gains of 54.1 to 99.6% for the parental cultivars. Apart from canopy spread and plant height, heritability and genetic gains of the progenies were slightly lower than the parents indicating high variability within families of the progenies. The phenotypic coefficient of variation was slightly greater than genotypic coefficient of variation indicating minimal influence of environment on the genotypes. For most of the characters evaluated, the mean performance of the progenies was higher than their corresponding parental lines. Although the genotypes differed significantly (P < 0.001) for all traits evaluated, cultivars such as Afebankye, Bosome nsia, Cedi bankye, 262 Debor, Kwadaso 25, Nkaakom 57 and Sisipe were found to constitute a pool of germplasm with adequate variability. The negative correlation between CMD incidence and other traits evaluated showed significant progress made in the breeding program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aina FA. 2007. Genetic variability in cassava as influenced by root yield in Nigeria. J. Biol. Sci. 7: 765–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akinwale MG, Akinyele BO, Dixon AGO, Odiyi AC. 2010. Genetic variability among forty-three cassava genotypes in three agro-ecological zones of Nigeria. J. Plant Breed. Crop Sci. 2: 104–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Akinyele BO, and Odiyi AC. 2007. Comparative study of vegetative morphology and the existing taxonomic status of Aloe vera L. J. Plant Sci. 2: 558–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allard RW. 1960. Principles of Plant Breeding. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, pp 485

    Google Scholar 

  • Asante IK, Dixon AGO. 2006. Field screening of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) germplasm for desirable traits by the use of augmented design. West Afr. J. Ecol. 10: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhateria S, Sood SP, Pathania A. 2006. Genetic analysis of quantitative traits across environments in Linseed (Linum usitatisimum L.). Euphytica 150: 185–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boster JS. 1984. Classification, cultivation and selection of Aguaruna cultivars of Manihot esculenta (Euphorbiaceae). Adv. Econ. Bot. 1: 34–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton GW, De Vane EH. 1953. Estimating heritability in tall Fescus from replicated clonal material. Agric. J. 45: 478–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli S, Erskine W, Haublin J, Grando S. 1994. Genotype x environment interaction and international breeding programme. Exp. Agric. 30: 177–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cock JH. 1985. Cassava: New Potential for a Neglected Crop. West View Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA, pp 191

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries J, Toenniessen G. 2001. Securing the harvest. Biotechnology, Breeding and Seed Systems for African Crops. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards ML, Cooper J. 1985. Plant virus detection using a new form of indirect ELISA. J. Virol. Methods 11: 309–319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agricultural Organisation Statistics (FAOSTAT). 2011. FAOSTAT database. Available at http://apps.fao.org/faostsat

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes JDA, Thomas BJ. 1988. The use of protein A-sandwich ELISA as a means for quantifying serological relationship between members of the tobamovirus group. Ann. Appl. Biol. 112: 117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gyawali S, Bhandari B, Subedi A. 2002. Farmer-Led Participatory Maize Breeding in Middle Hills of Nepal. Final report of Second Phase of the Project (August 2001–Sept., 2002). Local Initiatives for Biodiversity Research and Development (Li-BIRD), Pokhara, Nepal

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, SK, Bai, KV, Asiedu R. 1990. Tetraploids, triploids and 2n pollen from diploid interspecific crosses with cassava. Theor. Appl. Genet. 79: 437–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillocks RJ. 2002. Cassava in Africa. In Cassava: Biology, Production and Utilization, pp 67–89, Eds RJ Hillocks, AB Bellotti and JM Thresh. CAB International. Wallingford, UK

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lebot V, Aradhya KM. 1991. Isozyme variation in taro (Colocasia esculenta (L). Schott) from Asia and Oceania. Euphytica 56: 55–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Manu-Aduening JA. 2005. Participatory breeding for superi or mosaic-resistant cassava in Ghana. Doctoral Thesis, University of Greenwich, UK, pp 346

    Google Scholar 

  • Manu-Aduening JA, Lamboll RI, Dankyi AA, Gibson R. 2005. Cassava diversity in Ghanaian traditional farming systems. Euphytica 144: 331–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manu-Aduening JA, Lamboll RI, Ampong MG, Lamptey JN, Moses E, Dankyi AA, Gibson RW. 2006. Development of superior cassava cultivars in Ghana by farmers and scientists: The process adopted, outcomes and contributions and changing roles of different stakeholders. Euphytica 150: 47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassar, NMA, Graciano-Ribeiro D, Gomes PF, Hashimoto DYC. 2008. Alteration of reproductive system in a polyploidized cassava interspecific hybrid. Genet. Mol. Res. 7: 276–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nweke F. 2004. New challenges in the cassava transformation, in Nigeria and Ghana, Discussion paper series No. 118, Environmental and Production Technology Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nweke FI, Dixon AGO, Asiedu R, Folayan SA. 1994. Attributes of cassava varieties derived by farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. In MO Akoroda, ed, Root Crops for Food Security in Africa. Proceedings of the 5th Triennial Symposium of the International Society for Tropical Root Crops-African Branch (ISTRC-AB), 22–28 November, 1992, Kampala, Uganda, pp 65–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Nweke FI, Haleegoah J, Dixon AGO, Ajobo BO, Ugwu BO, Al-Hassan R. 1999. Cassava production in Ghana: A function of market demand and farmer access to improved production and processing technologies. Collaborative Study of Cassava in Africa (COSCA) working paper No. 21

    Google Scholar 

  • Okai E. 2001. Genetic diversity in some local cassava cultivars in Ghana. MSc. Thesis, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana, pp 88

    Google Scholar 

  • Oslen KM, Schaal BA. 1999. Evidence on the origin of cassava: phylogeography of Manihot esculenta. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 5586–5591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute. 1999. SAS/STAT User’s Guide 8. Version, SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh GN, Prasad R, Upadhyaya LN. 2001. A general class of chain type estimators using two auxiliary variables in two phase sampling. Acta Ciencia Indica, Vol XXVIIM, No. 4, pp 549–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh HP, Uma S. 2000. Genetic diversity of banana in India. In HP Singh, KL Chadha, eds, The proceedings of the conference of Banana Production and Utilization in 21st Century. Eds, pp 136–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Sthapit B, Joshi K, Gyawali S, Subedi A, Shreatha K, Chaudhary P, Rana R, Rijal D, Upadhyaya M, Jarvis D. 2002. Participatory plant breeding: setting breeding goals and choosing parents for on-farm conservation. In: MR Bellon, J Reeves, eds, Quantitative Analysis of Data from Participatory Methods in Plant Breeding. CIMMYT, Mexico. pp 104–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Thresh JM, Fargette D, Otim-Nape GW. 1994. Effects of African Cassava Mosaic geminivirus on yield of cassava. Trop. Sci. 34: 26–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Virk DS, Singh DN, Prasad SC, Gangwar JS, Witcombe JR. 2003. Collaborative and consultative participatory plant breeding of rice for the rainfed uplands of eastern India. Euphytica 132: 95–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witcombe JR, Gyawali S, Sunwar S, Sthapit BR, Joshi KD. 2006. Participatory plant breeding is better described as highly client-oriented plant breeding. II. Optional farmer collaboration in the segregating generations. Exp. Agric. 42: 79–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Witcombe JR, Virk DS. 2001. Number of crosses and population size for participatory and classical plant breeding. Euphytica 122: 451–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu KK, Heinz J, Meyer HK, Ladd SL. 1978. Minimum sample size for the estimating progeny mean and variance. Crop Sci. 18: 57–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Akwasi Manu-Aduening.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manu-Aduening, J.A., Peprah, B.B. & Agyeman, A. Genetic variability of cassava progenies developed through introgression of cassava mosaic disease resistance into Ghanaian landraces. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 16, 23–28 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-012-0053-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-012-0053-7

Key words

Navigation