Skip to main content
Log in

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the news: a descriptive analysis

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of Community Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC GT) diagnostic tools do not entail referral through a healthcare provider and are used by consumers to screen for genetic health risk, pharmacogenomics, and predisposition to certain diseases and to learn more about ancestry. The purpose of this study was to describe the content of DTC DNA online news articles – specifically to characterize how rising concerns related to consumer privacy, medical advancements, and bioethics are covered in online news as access to these testing kits continues to grow. One hundred news articles identified on Google News using the search term “direct to consumer DNA testing” were coded for pre-determined content categories. Only 34.0% of news articles were created by healthcare professionals. Only 10.0% of online news articles mentioned testing confidentiality and privacy protection. Articles that mentioned > 5 commercial DTC DNA products more often discussed how DTC DNA testing provides personalized information about health and link to family disease risk and other traits (85.7% vs. 61.1%, p = 0.02), can lead to the location of family members or ancestors (78.6% vs. 55.63%, p = 0.03), and that the testing results housed in DNA databases can be utilized by law enforcement to track suspects or their relatives (32.1% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.01). Articles that mentioned ≤ 5 commercial DTC DNA products failed to mention that there exists a potential for data breaches (75.0% vs. 53.6%, p = 0.04). Online news articles should adequately inform consumers regarding the benefits and risks of DTC GT tests to facilitate informed decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CHB, LS, and BC conceptualized the study. GCH completed the data analysis, while ED completed the data collection. All authors contributed to writing and revising the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corey H. Basch.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

Corey Basch, Grace Hillyer, Lalitha Samuel, Erela Datuowei, and Betty Cohn declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Basch, C.H., Hillyer, G.C., Samuel, L. et al. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the news: a descriptive analysis. J Community Genet 14, 63–69 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-022-00613-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-022-00613-z

Keywords

Navigation