Abstract
Taxonomic status of endangered peat-bog pine, Pinus uliginosa (Neumann) classified within the Pinus mugo complex, still remains to be elucidated. Here we present a complete chloroplast genome of P. uliginosa, to aid resolve its complex systematical position. The total genome size was 119,877 bp in length and contained a total of 112 genes, including 73 protein-coding genes, 35 tRNAs, and four rRNAs. The most of genes occur as a single copy. Five tRNA genes were duplicated from two to four times. Eighteen genes contain one intron, with a single gene containing two introns. No large inverted repeats were identified. The overall G + C content of P. uliginosa chloroplast genome is 38.5%.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Pinus uliginosa (Neumann) is one of the most controversial, mysterious and threatened taxa from an aggregate of European mountain pines—the Pinus mugo complex (Christensen 1987). The origin of this taxa is not accurately resolved and taxonomical position is still unclear and thus widely discussed in the scientific literature (Hamerník and Musil 2007). Decreasing population size, lack of natural regeneration and ongoing hybridization with the other pines altogether make this taxa threatened by extinction (Wachowiak et al. 2005; Lewandowski and Dering 2006). Highly conservative genome organization, very close relations among the taxa in the P. mugo complex, and lack of any diagnostic markers or taxa determinants for P. uliginosa were all demonstrated previously using morphological and anatomical traits, polymorphism of allozymes, as well as molecular cytogenetics and flow cytometry. On the other hand, recently reported chemotaxonomic markers for P. uliginosa cannot be directly applied for monitoring of gene flow in natural populations or for hybrids identification (Bonikowski et al. 2015; Celiński et al. 2015). Whole-plastid-based barcodes have been shown to have a great potential in species discrimination, especially for closely related taxa where none of single barcodes or their different combinations has sufficient resolution (Li et al. 2015).
Here, we report a complete chloroplast genome sequence of the P. uliginosa, determined using the next-generation sequencing method. The assembled and annotated complete nucleotide sequence of P. uliginosa chloroplast genome has been deposited in GenBank under accesion number KX833097.
Fresh pine needles were collected from a single tree of P. uliginosa (accession no. 06_0526_0008) grown in the Dendrological Garden, Poznań University of Life Sciences (52°25′37″N, 16°53′48″E). Intact chloroplasts fraction was isolated from needles according to Vieira et al. (2014). Plastome DNA was extracted using CTAB protocol (Doyle and Doyle 1990). The chloroplast DNA of P. uliginosa was fragmented using Covaris E210 (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA). The library was prepared with a NEBNext DNA Library Prep Kit (New England Biolabs Inc., Ipswich, MA, USA) using dual-indexing TruSeq HT (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Paired-end (PE, 2 × 250nt) sequencing of a library was performed using Illumina MiSeq (MiSeq Reagent kit v2) at the Genomed sequencing facility (Warsaw, Poland) following manufacture’s protocols (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The automatic primary analysis and the de-multiplexing of the raw reads were performed on MiSeq with the use of MiSeq Reporter (MSR) v2.4 (BaseSpace). In total, 1,355,084 paired-end reads (2 × 250 bp) were obtained. The obtained reads were trimmed using Cutadapt 1.4 and assembled with CLC Genomics Workbench 7.0.4 in reference based assembly mode (with D17510.1.1—Pinus thunbergii chloroplast DNA as a reference). As a result, 27,419 paired-end reads with the average length 239,22 bp were assembled into 45 contigs with mean coverage of 54,40×. Gaps and ambiguous sites were PCR-amplified and re-sequenced using Sanger method, using 3130x Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Protein-coding genes and genes for non-coding RNAs were annotated with DOGMA (Dual Organellar GenoMe Annotator; Wyman et al. 2004) and cpGAVAS (Chloroplast Genome Annotation, Visualization, Analysis, and GenBank Submission Server; Liu et al. 2012). Annotated sequence was aligned to reference genome using MAFFT (Katoh et al. 2002) and all features were manually inspected to cross-validate the predictions. A circular map of the chloroplast genome was drawn with the OGDRAW software (Lohse et al. 2013). The overall GC content was analyzed using Geneious 9.1.2 (Kearse et al. 2012). REPuter (Kurtz et al. 2001) was used to visualize the large (>1000 bp) duplicated sequences in P. uliginosa cp genome by forward versus reverse complement (palindromic) alignment.
The complete chloroplast (cp) genome of P. uliginosa is 119,877 bp in length (Fig. 1). The overall G + C content of the P. uliginosa chloroplast genome is 38.5%, which is similar to the other reported for Pinaceae cp genomes (Duan et al. 2016; Fang et al. 2016). The cp genome of P. uliginosa contains a total of 112 predicted functional genes including 73 protein-coding genes, 4 ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and 35 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes (Table 1). Five tRNA genes were duplicated from two (trnF-GAA, trnH-GUG, trnS-GCU and trnV-GAC) to four times (trnM-CAU). Twelve genes (petB, petD, atpF, rpl2, rpl16, rpoC1) and six tRNA genes contain one intron, while one gene (ycf3) contains two introns. There were no large inverted repeats (IRs) in the P. uliginosa plastome.
Chloroplast genome map of P. uliginosa. Genes drawn inside the circle are transcribed clockwise, and those outside are counterclockwise. Genes belonging to different functional groups are color-coded. The darker gray in the inner circle corresponds to GC content, while the lighter gray corresponds to AT content
Here reported chloroplast genome of P. uliginosa provides useful genomic resources for further studies on determination of taxa-diagnostic markers in the P. mugo complex, analysis of hybridization and introgression processes in this complex, characterization of genetic diversity of P. uliginosa and more effective protection of its threatened gene pools.
References
Bonikowski R, Celiński K, Wojnicka-Półtorak A, Maliński T (2015) Composition of essential oils isolated from the needles of P. uncinata Ramond ex. Mirb and P. uliginosa Neumann ex Wimmer grown in Poland. Nat Prod Commun 10:371–373
Celiński K, Bonikowski R, Wojnicka-Półtorak A, Chudzińska E, Maliński T (2015) Volatiles as chemosystematic markers for distinguishing closely related species within the Pinus mugo complex. Chem Biodivers 12:1208–1213
Christensen KI (1987) Taxonomic revision of the Pinus mugo complex and P. rhaetica (P. mugo x sylvestris) (Pinaceae). Nord J Bot 7:383–408
Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15
Duan RY, Yang LM, Lv T, Wu GL, Huang MY (2016) The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Pinus dabeshanensis. Conservation Genet Resour. doi:10.1007/s12686-016-0567-2
Fang MF, Wang YJ, Zu YM, Dong WL, Wang RN, Deng TT, Li ZH (2016) The complete chloroplast genome of the Taiwan red pine Pinus taiwanensis (Pinaceae). Mitochondr DNA Part A 27:2732–2733
Hamerník J, Musil I (2007) The Pinus mugo complex—its structuring and general overview of the used nomenclature. J For Sci 53:253–266
Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T (2002) MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 30:3059–3066
Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Mentjies P, Drummond A (2012) Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28:1647–1649
Kurtz S, Choudhuri J, Ohlebusch E, Schleiermacher C, Stoye J, Giegerich R (2001) REPuter: The manifold applications of repeat analysis on a genomic scale. Nucleic Acids Res 29:4633–4642
Lewandowski A, Dering M (2006) Crossability between Pinus uliginosa and its putative parental species Pinus sylvestris and Pinus mugo. Silvae Genet 55:52–54
Li X, Yang Y, Henry RJ, Rossetto M, Wang Y, Chen S (2015) Plant DNA barcoding: from gene to genome. Biol Rev 90:157–166
Liu C, Shi L, Zhu Y, Chen H, Zhang J, Lin X, Guan X (2012) CpGAVAS, an integrated web server for the annotation, visualization, analysis, and GenBank submission of completely sequenced chloroplast genome sequences. BMC Genomics 13:715
Lohse M, Drechsel O, Kahlau S, Bock R (2013) Organellar Genome DRAW—a suite of tools for generating physical maps of plastid and mitochondrial genomes and visualizing expression data sets. Nucleic Acids Res 41:W575–W581
Vieira LN, Faoro H, Fraga HPF, Rogalski M, Souza EM, Pedrosa FO, Nodari RO, Guerra MP (2014). An improved protocol for intact chloroplasts and cpDNA isolation in conifers. PLoS One 9 e84792. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084792
Wachowiak W, Celiński K, Prus-Głowacki W (2005) Evidence of natural reciprocal hybridisation between Pinus uliginosa and P. sylvestris in the sympatric population of the species. Flora 200:563–568
Wyman SK, Jansen RK, Boore JL (2004) Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics 20:3252–3255
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the National Science Centre in Poland under Project No. NN304060339. The founders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Funding
The funding was provided by Narodowe Centrum Nauki (Grant No. NN304 060339).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Celiński, K., Kijak, H., Barylski, J. et al. Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome of Pinus uliginosa (Neumann) from the Pinus mugo complex. Conservation Genet Resour 9, 209–212 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-016-0652-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-016-0652-6