Abstract
Hybridization with non-native species is a threat to many taxa, but hybrids can be difficult to identify based on morphology. Genetic data is useful for estimating the ancestry of admixed populations, and diallelic markers such as single nucleotide polymorphisms are popular for such applications. When taxa are evolutionarily well diverged, loci frequently become fixed for different alleles in each taxa, and the degree of genetic admixture between two taxa can be estimated by counting diagnostic alleles for each taxa. However, when there is hybridization between more than two taxa, and loci have only two alleles, the origin of each allele cannot be assigned ambiguously to a taxon. In this note, I show how the expectation–maximization algorithm can be used to solve this problem. A computer program for implementing this approach is available at www.montana.edu/kalinowski.
References
Allendorf FW, Leary RF, Spruell P, Wenburg JK (2001) The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends Ecol Evol 16:613–622
Anderson EC, Thompson EA (2002) A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data. Genetics 160:1217--1229
Benke RJ (2002) Trout and salmon of North America. The Free Press, New York
Ceppellini R, Siniscalco M, Smith CAB (1955) The estimation of gene frequencies in a randomly mating population. Ann Hum Genet 20:97–115
Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB (1977) Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc B 39:1–38
Devroye L (1986) Non-uniform random variate generation. Springer, New York
Finger AJ, Stephens MR, Clipperton NW, May B (2009) Six diagnostic single nucleotide polymorphism markers for detecting introgression between cutthroat and rainbow trouts. Mol Ecol Resour 9:759–763
Kalinowski ST, Taper ML (2006) Maximum likelihood estimation of the frequency of null alleles at microsatellite loci. Conserv Genet 7:991–995
Leary RF, Gould WR, Sage GK (1996) Success of basibranchial teeth in indicating pure populations of rainbow trout and failure to indicate pure populations of westslope cutthroat trout. North Am J Fish Manag 16:210–213
McLachlan G, Krishnan T (1996) The EM algorithm and extensions. John Wiley and Sons, New York
Muhlfeld CC, Kalinowski ST, McMahon TE, Painter S, Leary RF, Taper ML, Allendorf FW (2009) Hybridization reduces fitness of cutthroat trout in the wild. Biol Lett 5:328–331
Ostberg CO, Rodriguez RJ (2004) Bi-parentally inherited species-specific markers identify hybridization between rainbow trout and cutthroat trout subspecies. Mol Ecol Notes 4:26–29
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959
Rhymer JM, Simberloff D (1996) Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:83--109
Shepard BB, May BE, Urie W (2003) Status of westslope cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki lewisi) in the United States: 2002. Westslope Cutthroat Interagency Conservation Team
Stephens MR, Clipperton NW, May B (2009) Subspecies-informative SNP assays for evaluating introgression between native golden trout and introduced rainbow trout. Mol Ecol Resour 9:339–343
Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499
Weir BS (1996) Genetic data analysis II. Sinauer Associates Inc. Sunderland, MA.
Acknowledgments
Funding for this work was provided by Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks and the National Science Foundation (DEB 071745). I thank two anonymous reviewers for suggestions that improved this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kalinowski, S.T. How to use SNPs and other diagnostic diallelic genetic markers to identify the species composition of multi-species hybrids. Conservation Genet Resour 2, 63–66 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-009-9146-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-009-9146-0