Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Does the patient or pathology exist?

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Medicine and the Person

Abstract

For a long time, the guidelines of medical conduct represented a useful, but not binding, model for adapting in order to avoid professional liability. In this sense, the idea of relying solely on these guidelines raises serious concerns, as very often there is no real “evidence” to scientifically support the recommendations. The authors have conducted a review of the literature to draw the attention of the scientific community to the highlights and shadows of this dangerous Italian prospect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aristotele, Metafisica (1978) Italian traduction of Reale G. Rusconi, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  2. Provera A (2013) Residuo di colpa’ nell’ipotesi di condotta del medico tenuta in ossequio alle linee-guida. Il “paradosso” dellaculpa in actione perita. Riv It Med Leg 3:1420–1435

    Google Scholar 

  3. L’art Vallini A (2013) 3 del “Decreto Balduzzi” tra retaggi dottrinali, esigenze concrete, approssimazioni testuali, dubbi di costituzionalità. Riv It Med Leg 2:736–750

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rotolo G (2013) Guidelines e leges artis in ambito medico. Riv It Med Leg 1:269–297

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marino PA (2013) Dalle linee guida e dai protocolli all’individualizzazione della colpa penale nel settore sanitario. Misura oggettiva e soggettiva della malpractice. Riv It Med Leg 1:502–506

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lytras T, Bonovas S, Chronis C, Konstantinidis AK, Kopsachilis F, Papamichail DP, Dounias G (2013) Occupational asthma guidelines: a systematic quality appraisal using the AGREE II instrument. Occup Environ Med. doi:10.1136/oemed-2013-101656

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sanclemente G, Acosta JL, Tamayo ME, Bonfill X, Alonso-Coello P (2013) Clinical practice guidelines for treatment of acne vulgaris: a critical appraisal using the AGREE II instrument. Arch Dermatol Res PMID:23925586

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hoomans T, Evers SM, Ament AJ, Hübben MW, van der Weijden T, Grimshaw JM, Severens JL (2007) The methodological quality of economic evaluations of guideline implementation into clinical practice: a systematic review of empiric studies. Value Health 10:305–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Niessen LW, Grijseels E, Koopmanschap M, Rutten F (2007) Health DMo economic analysis for clinical practice—the case of 31 national consensus guidelines in the Netherlands. J Eval Clin Pract 13:68–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vale L, Thomas R, MacLennan G, Grimshaw J (2007) Systematic review of economic evaluations and cost analyses of guideline implementation strategies. Eur J Health Econ 8:111–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alonso-Coello P, Irfan A, Solà I, Gich I, Delgado-Noguera M, Rigau D, Tort S, Bonfill X, Burgers J, Schunemann H (2010) The quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: a systematic review of guideline appraisal studies. Qual Saf Health Care 19:e58

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tan JK, Wolfe BJ, Bulatovic R, Jones EB, Lo AY (2010) Critical appraisal of quality of clinical practice guidelines for treatment of psoriasis vulgaris, 2006–2009. J Invest Dermatol 130:2389–2395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wimpenny P, van Zelm R (2007) Appraising and comparing pressure ulcer guidelines. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 4:40–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sabharwal S, Patel V, Nijjer SS, Kirresh A, Darzi A, Chambers JC, Malik I, Kooner JS, Athanasiou T (2013) Guidelines in cardiac clinical practice: evaluation of their methodological quality using the AGREE II instrument. J R Soc Med 106(8):315–322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jo MW, Lee JY, Kim NS, Kim SY, Sheen S, Kim SH, Lee SI (2013) Assessment of the quality of clinical practice guidelines in Korea using the AGREE Instrument. J Korean Med Sci 28(3):357–365

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Simone B, De Feo E, Nicolotti N, Ricciardi W, Boccia S (2012) Methodological quality of English-language genetic guidelines on hereditary breast-cancer screening and management: an evaluation using the AGREE instrument. BMC Med 10:143

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Don-Wauchope AC, Sievenpiper JL, Hill SA, Iorio A (2012) Applicability of the AGREE II instrument in evaluating the development process and quality of current National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry guidelines. Clin Chem 58(10):1426–1437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Forsberg JS, Hansson MG, Evers K (2013) International guidelines on biobank research leave researchers in ambiguity: why is this so? Eur J Epidemiol 28(6):449–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (2002) International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. CIOMS, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hansson MG, Dillner J, Bartram CR et al (2006) Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research? Lancet Oncol 7(3):266–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lunshof J, Chadwick R, Vorhaus D et al (2008) From genetic privacy to open consent? Nat Rev Genet 9:406–411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Arnason V (2004) Coding and consent: moral challenges of the database project in Iceland. Bioethics 18:27–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (2008) International ethical guidelines for epidemiological studies. CIOMS, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  24. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2002) Human genetic data: preliminary study by the IBC on its collection, processing, storage and use. UNESCO, IBC, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  25. Council of Europe recommendation Rec 2006 (2005) 4 of the committee of ministers to member states on research on biological materials of human origin. Council of Europe, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  26. European Society of Human Genetics (2003) Data storage and DNA banking for biomedical research: technical, social and ethical issues. Recommendations of the European society of human genetics. Eur J Hum Genet 11(suppl 2):S8–S10

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gurses AP, Seidl KL, Vaidya V, Bochicchio G, Harris AD, Hebden J et al (2008) Systems ambiguity and guideline compliance: a qualitative study of how intensive care units follow evidence-based guidelines to reduce healthcare-associated infections. Qual Saf Health Care 17:351–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ali FS, Harris PA, Butler PE (2002) Ambiguity in the UK guidelines for the management of cutaneous melanoma. Br J Plast Surg 55(5):452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tudiver F, Guibert R, Haggerty J, Ciampi A, Medved W, Brown JB, Herbert C, Katz A, Ritvo P, Grant B, Goel V, Smith P, O’Beirne M, Williams JI, Moliner P (2002) What influences family physicians’ cancer screening decisions when practice guidelines are unclear or conflicting? J Fam Pract 51(9):760

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tudiver F, Brown JB, Medved W, Herbert C, Ritvo P, Guibert R, Haggerty J, Goel V, Smith P, O’Beirne M, Katz A, Moliner P, Ciampi A, Williams JI (2001) Making decisions about cancer screening when the guidelines are unclear or conflicting. J Fam Pract 50(8):682–687

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jo MW, Lee JY, Kim NS, Kim SY, Sheen S, Kim SH, Lee SI (2013) Assessment of the quality of clinical practice guidelines in Korea using the AGREE instrument. J Korean Med Sci 28(3):357–365

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Farr BM (2013) Unclear study methods still confusing readers despite CONSORT guidelines (e.g., lidocaine patch does relieve pain of covered rib fractures). J Clin Epidemiol. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.010

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Moher D, Schultz KF, Altman DG (2001) The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 134:657–662

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Boutron I, Dutton S, Ravaud P, Altman DG (2010) Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes. JAMA 303:2058–2064

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Glasziou P, Meats E, Heneghan C, Shepperd S (2008) What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? BMJ 14:1472–1474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ruiz MA (2013) Reviews and guidelines: evidence of progress and a starting point for standardization and changes. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter 35(2):75–76

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ollenschläger G (2013) Clinical practice guidelines and knowledge management in healthcare. Recent Prog Med 104(10):515–521

    Google Scholar 

  38. Marino PA (2013) Dalle linee guida e dai protocolli all’individualizzazione della colpa penale nel settore sanitario. Misura oggettiva e soggettiva della malpractice. Riv It Med Leg 1:502–506

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anatomical Sciences, Histological, Legal Medicine and Locomotor Apparatus, University “Sapienza” of Rome, Viale Regina Elena, 336, 00161, Rome, Italy

    Francesco Massoni, Pasquale Ricci & Serafino Ricci

Authors
  1. Francesco Massoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pasquale Ricci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Serafino Ricci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serafino Ricci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Massoni, F., Ricci, P. & Ricci, S. Does the patient or pathology exist?. J Med Pers 12, 5–8 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12682-014-0165-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12682-014-0165-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation