Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring Mindfulness: Applying Generalizability Theory to Distinguish between State and Trait

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Mindfulness Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mindfulness can be conceptualized as either a state or a trait, but currently, there is no reliable psychometric method to distinguish clearly between the two in psychological measures. Notwithstanding the clinical effectiveness of mindfulness, any specific element of mindfulness treatment can only be evaluated by comparing state and trait changes using techniques that allow such changes to be measured. Generalizability Theory (GT) is a suitable method to differentiate between state and trait variance components, and its application is illustrated here with an empirical example using the Toronto Mindfulness Scale (TMS). Person × occasion interaction is a marker of individual state changes and should explain the largest amount of variance in a valid state measure. To assess state variability, data were collected on three separate occasions: (i) after a holiday, (ii) immediately after a mindfulness exercise, and (iii) before a stressful event (i.e., exam). Generalizability analysis was applied to examine sources of true and error variances. The TMS captured a larger amount of variance attributed to a state and only a small amount associated with trait mindfulness, which is consistent with the purpose of the measure. This study has demonstrated that Generalizability Theory can be usefully applied to distinguish between state and trait components in a measure, and it is recommended as an appropriate psychometric method to validate state and trait measurement tools. These findings have far-reaching implications to improve the accuracy of the distinction between state and trait in mindfulness measurement and other areas of psychological assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allal, L., & Cardinet, J. (1976). Application of generalizability theory: estimation of errors and adaptation of measurement designs. Neuchâtel: Institut Romand de Recherche et de documentation pédagogiques.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction on to measurement theory. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arterberry, B. J., Martens, M. P., Cadigan, J. M., & Rohrer, D. (2014). Application of generalizability theory to big five inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 98–103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: a conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 125–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, R., & Norman, G. (2012). Generalizability theory for the perplexed: a practical introduction and guide: AMEE guide no. 68. Medical Teacher, 34, 960–992.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–884.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, R. L. (1977). Generalizability analysis: principles and procedures. Iowa City: The American College Testing Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, R. L. (1992). Elements of generalizability theory (2nd ed.). Iowa City: ACT Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, R. L. (2001). Generalizability theory. New York: Springer-Verlag Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, A. H. (1989). Personality as traits. American Psychologist, 44, 1378–1388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahn, B. R., & Polich, J. (2006). Meditation states and traits : EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 180–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, W. F., John, O. P., & Goldberg, L. R. (1988). Conceptions of states and traits: dimensional attributes with ideals as prototypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 541–557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chiesa, A., & Serretti, A. (2010). A systematic review of neurobiological and clinical features of mindfulness meditations. Psychological Medicine, 40, 1239–1252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., Rajaratnam, N., & Gleser, G. C. (1963). Theory of generalizability: a liberation of reliability theory. The British Journal of Statistical Psychology, XVII(2), 137–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. M., Lau, M. A., & Cairns, D. R. (2009). Development and preliminary validation of a trait version of the Toronto Mindfulness Scale. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23(3), 185–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (1984). Trait theory as personality theory: can a part be as great as the whole? Psychological Inquiry, 5, 120–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1925). Intraclass correlation and the analysis of variance. In: statistical methods for research workers. New Delhi: Cosmo Publications for Genesis Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardinet, J., Johnson, S., & Pini, G. (2009). Applying generalizability theory using EduG. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiser, C., Litson, K., Bishop, J., Keller, B. T., Burns, G. L., & Servera, M. (2015). Analyzing person, situation and person - situation interaction effects: Latent State-Trait Models for the Combination of Random and Fixed Situations.

  • Hamaker, E. L., Nesselroade, J. R., & Molenaar, P. C. (2007). The integrated trait-state model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 295–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, S. G., Sawyer, A. T., Witt, A., & Oh, D. (2010). The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(2), 169–183.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanovski, B., & Malhi, G. S. (2007). The psychological and neurophysiological concomitants of mindfulness forms of meditation. Acta Neuropsychiatrica, 19, 76–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., & Zautra, A. (Eds.). (2001). Trait–state models for longitudinal data. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, M. A., Bishop, S. R., Segal, Z. V., Buis, T., Anderson, N. D., Carlson, L., et al. (2006). The Toronto mindfulness scale: development and validation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(12), 1445–1467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park, T., Reilly-Spong, M., & Gross, C. R. (2013). Mindfulness: a systematic review of instruments to measure an emergent patient-reported outcome (PRO). Quality of Life Research, 22, 2639–2659.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanaiah, N. V., Franzen, M., & Schill, T. (1983). A psychometric study of the State-Trait Anxiety inventory. Personality Assessment, 47, 531–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, S., Greeson, J. M., Reibel, D. K., Green, J. S., Jasser, S. A., & Beasley, D. (2010). Mindfulness-based stress reduction for chronic pain conditions: variation in treatment outcomes and role of home meditation practice. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 68(1), 29–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2013). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. G., Webb, N. M., & Rowley, G. L. (1989). Generalizability theory. American Psychologist, 44, 599–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoukri, M. M., Asyali, M. H., & Donner, A. (2004). Sample size requirements for the design of reliability study: review and new results. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 13, 251–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Test manual for the state trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D. (1999). Manual for the state-trait anger expression inventory-2. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swiss Society for Research in Education Working Group. (2006). EDUG user guide. Neuchâtel: IRDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M., & Penman, D. (2011). Mindfulness: an eight-week plan to find peace in a frantic world. New York: Rodale Inc..

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is a part of doctoral work of the first author funded by the Vice-Chancellor’s Scholarship of the Auckland University of Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oleg N. Medvedev.

Ethics declarations

The study was conducted in compliance with the guidelines of the Auckland University of Technology Ethics Committee.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Medvedev, O.N., Krägeloh, C.U., Narayanan, A. et al. Measuring Mindfulness: Applying Generalizability Theory to Distinguish between State and Trait. Mindfulness 8, 1036–1046 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0679-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0679-0

Keywords

Navigation