Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Development and Validation of the Japanese Version of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Mindfulness Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes the development of a Japanese version of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), currently the most comprehensive measure of mindfulness. This measure was derived using a joint factor analysis of five pre-existing measures. Evaluation of a Japanese version using a large sample of Japanese college students (total N = 1,349; mean age = 19.26, SD = 2.86, range = 18–63, 58% women) revealed preliminary evidence of sound psychometric properties. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported the measure’s original five-factor structure: observing, describing, acting with awareness, nonjudging, and nonreactivity. In addition, a hierarchical factor structure was found, with a second-order factor of mindfulness being related to four of the five specific factors (observing was the exception). This factor structure is consistent with previous findings from a sample unselected for meditation experience. All five subscales (facets) and the total score had acceptable to good internal consistency. Construct validity was demonstrated via expected correlations with related measures. Mindfulness facets were generally positively associated with adaptive psychological functioning. Specific correlates did differ across the five facets, providing further support for the multidimensional nature of mindfulness. The correlates of observing facet were suggestive of more maladaptive outcomes, replicating results obtained with unselected and nonmeditating samples. Overall, the Japanese version of the FFMQ appears to have psychometric properties comparable to those of the original version, warranting its use in future studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arch, J. J., & Craske, M. G. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness: emotion regulation following a focused breathing induction. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1849–1858.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arimura, T., Komaki, G., Murakami, S., Tamagawa, K., Nishikata, H., Kawai, K., et al. (2002). Development of the Structured Interview by the modified edition of Beth Israel Hospital Psychosomatic Questionnaire (SIBIQ) in Japanese edition to evaluate alexithymia. Japanese Journal of Psychosomatic Medicine, 42, 259–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A. (2010). Mindfulness- and acceptance-based intervention and processes of change (pp. 1–21). In R. A. Baer (Ed.), Assessing mindfulness and acceptance process in clients. CA, USA: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills. Assessment, 11, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13, 27–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Lykins, E., Button, D., Krietemeyer, J., Sauer, S., et al. (2008). Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment, 15, 329–342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bagby, R. M., Parker, J. D. A., & Taylor, G. J. (1994). The twenty item Toronto Alexithymia Scale: I Item selection and cross validation of the factor structure. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 38, 23–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Brown, G. K., & Steer, R. A. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., et al. (2004). Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 230–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. C., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K., Zettle, R. D. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: a revised measure of psychological flexibility and acceptance. Behavior Therapy.

  • Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Perils and promise in defining and measuring mindfulness: observations from experience. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 243–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmody, J., & Baer, R. A. (2008). Relationships between mindfulness practice and levels of mindfulness, medical and psychological symptoms and well-being in a mindfulness-based stress reduction program. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 31, 23–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright-Hatton, S., & Wells, A. (1997). Beliefs about worry and intrusions: the meta-cognitions questionnaire and its correlates. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 11, 279–296.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, P., Hember, M., Symes, J., Peters, E., Kuipers, E., & Dagnan, D. (2008). Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images: reliability and validity of the Southampton mindfulness questionnaire (SMQ). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47, 451–455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R., Gullone, E., & Allen, N. B. (2009). Mindful emotion regulation: an integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 560–572.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M. S., Christopher, V., & Charoensuk, S. (2009). Assessing “Western” mindfulness among Thai Theravada Buddhist monks. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 12, 303–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. J., & Calamari, J. E. (2004). Thought-focused attention and obsessive–compulsive symptoms: an evaluation of cognitive self-consciousness in a nonclinical sample. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 28, 457–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Y., Liu, X., Rodriguez, M. A., & Xia, C. (2011). The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire: psychometric properties of the Chinese version. Mindfulness, 2, 123–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340–347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, G., Hayes, A., Kumar, S., Greeson, J., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2007). Mindfulness and emotion regulation: the development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29(3), 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, A., Pretzer, J., Fleming, B., & Simon, K. M. (1990). Clinical applications of cognitive therapy. New York: Prenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gratz, K. L., & Tull, M. T. (2010). Emotion regulation as a mechanism of change in acceptance- and mindfulness-based treatments. In R. A. Baer (Ed.), Assessing mindfulness and acceptance process in clients. CA, USA: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P., Niemann, L., Schmidt, S., & Walach, H. (2004). Mindfulness-based stress reduction and health benefits: a meta-analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57, 35–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: an experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., Wilson, K. G., Bissett, R. T., Pistorello, J., Toarmino, D., et al. (2004). Measuring experiential avoidance: a preliminary test of a working model. Psychological Record, 54, 553–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyler, S. E., & Rieder, R. O. (1987). PDQ-R (Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-revised). New York, NY: New York State Psychiatric Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyler, S. E., Skodol, A. E., Kellman, H. D., Oldham, J. M., & Rosnick, L. (1990). Validity of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-revised: comparison with two structured interviews. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 1043–1048.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain and illness. New York: Delacorte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are: mindfulness meditation in everyday life. New York: Hyperion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanetsuki, M., Masuda, T., Oikawa, M., & Nedate, K. (2006). Development of a scale to measure fear of emotions: The Japanese version of the Affective Control Scale. Poster session presented at the 70th meeting of the Japanese Psychological Association, Fukuoka, Japan.

  • Kinoshita, N., Yamamoto, T., & Shimada, H. (2008). Development of the Japanese version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II. Paper presented at 21th meeting of the Japanese Association of Health Psychology, Tokyo, Japan.

  • Kojima, M., Furukawa, T. A., Takahashi, H., Kawai, M., Nagaya, T., & Tokudome, S. (2002). Cross-cultural validation of the Beck Depression Inventory-II in Japan. Psychiatry Research, 110, 291–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive–behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lischetzke, T., & Eid, M. (2003). Is attention to feelings beneficial or detrimental to affective well-being? Mood regulation as a moderator variable. Emotion, 3, 361–377.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, A., Slagter, H. A., & Davidson, R. J. (2008). Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 163–169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & Hau, K. Y. (1996). An evaluation of incremental fit indices: a clarification of mathematical and empirical properties. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 315–353). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mor, N., & Winquist, J. (2002). Self-focused attention and negative affect: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 638–662.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moriguchi, Y., Maeda, M., Igarashi, T., Ishikawa, T., Shoji, M., Kubo, C., et al. (2007). Age and gender effect on alexithymia in large, Japanese community and clinical samples: a cross-validation study of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20). BioPsychoSocial Medicine, 1, 7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Radel, R., Sarrazin, P., Legrain, P., & Gobance, L. (2009). Subliminal priming of motivational orientation in educational settings: effect on academic performance moderated by mindfulness. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 695–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothbart, M. K., Ahadi, S. A., & Evans, D. E. (2000). Temperament and personality: origins and outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 122–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, S., & Baer, R. A. (2010). Mindfulness and decentering as mechanisms of change in mindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions. In R. A. Baer (Ed.), Assessing mindfulness and acceptance process in clients (pp. 25–50). CA, USA: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer-Dickson, N. (2004). Current developments of metacognitive concepts and their clinical implications: mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 17, 223–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmertz, S. K., Anderson, P. L., & Robins, D. L. (2009). The relation between self-report mindfulness and performance on tasks of sustained attention. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 31, 60–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, J. B., Stage, F. K., King, J., Nora, A., & Barlow, E. A. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2002). Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for depression. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugiura, T. (2007). Cognitive resilience to stress. Tokyo: Kazama Shobo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugiura, T., & Umaoka, K. (2003). The relationship between cognitive control and depression in female university students. Japanese Journal of Health Psychology, 16, 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugiura, T., Sugiura, Y., & Umaoka, K. (2003). Correlates of cognitive control: personality traits, meta-cognitions, and coping styles. Journal of the Graduate School: Home Economics, Human Life Sciences, 9, 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treadway, M. T., & Lazar, S. W. (2010). Meditation and neuroplasticity: using mindfulness to change brain. In R. A. Baer (Ed.), Assessing mindfulness and acceptance process in clients (pp. 185–205). CA, USA: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uehara, T., Sato, T., Sakado, K., & Sato, S. (1996). Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the PDQ-R. Archives of Psychiatric Diagnosis and Clinical Evaluation, 7, 259–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uehara, T., Sakado, K., & Sato, T. (1997). Test-retest reliability of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-Revised. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 51, 369–372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walach, H., Buchheld, N., Buttenmuller, V., Kleinknecht, N., & Schmidt, S. (2006). Measuring mindfulness; The Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory (FMI). Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1543–1555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A. (2000). Emotional disorders and metacognition. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A. (2005). Detached mindfulness in cognitive therapy: a metacognitive analysis and ten techniques. Journal of Rational-Emotive of Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 23, 337–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A., & Cartwright-Hatton, S. (2004). A short form of the metacognitions questionnaire: properties of the MCQ-30. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42, 385–396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. E., Chambless, D. L., & Ahrens, A. (1997). Are emotions frightening? An extension of the fear of fear construct. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 239–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagata, S., Takahashi, Y., Shigemasu, K., Ono, Y., & Kijima, N. (2005). Development and validation of Japanese version of effortful control scale for adults. Japanese Journal of Personality, 14, 30–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a MEXT Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B). The authors thank Dr. Gen Komaki for permitting the use of the Japanese TAS-20 and Dr. Takashi Muto for his assistance in data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Integrated Arts and Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-7-1, Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima City, Hiroshima Prefecture, 739-8521, Japan

    Yoshinori Sugiura

  2. Faculty of Human Development, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan

    Atsushi Sato

  3. Faculty of Education, Ryukyu University, Okinawa, Japan

    Yoshinori Ito

  4. Japan Foundation for Neuroscience and Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan

    Hiroki Murakami

Authors
  1. Yoshinori Sugiura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Atsushi Sato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yoshinori Ito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hiroki Murakami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshinori Sugiura.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sugiura, Y., Sato, A., Ito, Y. et al. Development and Validation of the Japanese Version of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. Mindfulness 3, 85–94 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-011-0082-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-011-0082-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation