Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A mathematical optimization technique for managing selective catalytic reduction for coal-fired power plants

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Energy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) is an emissions control technique that primarily reduces harmful emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NO x ). To maintain SCR performance, catalyst layers maybe added, removed, or replaced to improve NO x reduction efficiency. To make these changes, power plants must be temporarily shut down, and SCR maintenance during scheduled power plant outages can be very expensive. Consequently, developing a fleet-wide SCR management plans that are both efficient at reducing NO x and limiting operating costs would be extremely desirable. We propose an SCR management framework that finds an optimal SCR management plan that minimizes NO x emissions using integer programming. The SCR management tool consists of two main modules—the SCR schedule generation module and the SCR optimization module. Furthermore, the SCR management framework addresses decision making from the fleet-wide perspective as well as a single plant as opposed to only a single plant, which is currently commercially available. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the tool and provide a tradeoff between NO x reduction and operating cost using Pareto optimal efficient frontiers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen, J., Frey, H.: Optimization under variability and uncertainty: A case study for NO x emissions control for a gasification system. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38, 6741–6747 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cichanowicz, J., Muzio, L.: Factors affecting selection of a catalyst management strategy. In: Proceedings of the DOE-EPRI-EPA-AWMA Power Plant Air Pollutant Control Mega Symposium: DOE/EPRI/EPA/AWMA, Washington, DC (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cichanowicz, J., Smith, L., Muzio, L.: Twenty-five years of SCR evolution: Implications for U.S. application and operation. In: Proceedings of the EPRI-DOE-EPA Combined Power Plant Air Pollutant Control Symposium: The MEGA Symposium; EPRI/DOE/EPA, Chicago, IL (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cichanowicz, J., Smith, L., Muzio, L., Marchetti, J.: 100 gw of SCR: Installation status and implications of operating performance on compliance strategies. In: Proceedings of the EPA-EPRI-NETLAWMA Combined Power Plant Air Pollutant Control Mega Symposium: EPA/EPRI/NETL/AWMA, Washington, DC (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. COIN-OR Branch-and-Cut MIP Solver. https://projects.coin-or.org/Cbc

  6. Diwekar, U., Rubin, E., Frey, H.: Optimal design of advanced power systems under uncertainty. Energy Convers. Manag. 38(15), 1725–1735 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. FERCo: CatReact software. http://www.ferco.com/catreact.html

  8. Frey, H.: Engineering-economic evaluation of SCR NO x control systems for coal-fired power plants. In: Proceedings of the American Power Conference, Chicago, Illinois (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grabitech: MultiSimplex software. http://www.grabitech.com/Multisimplex.htm

  10. Mi, J.: CFD for SCR design. Tech. rep., Southern Company Inc.

  11. Muzio, L., Quartucy, G., Cichanowicz, J.: Overview of status of post-combustion NOx control: SNCR, SCR, and hybrid technologies. Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 17(1–2), 4–30 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nemhauser, G., Wolsey, L.: Integer and Combinatorial Optimization. Wiley-Interscience, New York (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Padberg, M., Rinaldi, G.: A branch-and-cut algorithm for the resolution of large-scale symmetric traveling salesman problems. SIAM Rev. 33(1), 60–100 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Pritchard, S., DiFrancesco, C.: SCR catalyst management: Enhancing operational flexibility. Tech. rep., Cormetech, Inc. (2006)

  15. Pritchard, S., DiFrancesco, C., Kaneko, S., Kobayashi, N., Suyrgama, K., Eda, K.: Optimizing SCR catalyst design and performance for coal-fired boilers. In: Proceedings of the EPRI/EPA 1995 Joint Symposium on Stationary Combustion NO Control, Kansas City, MO (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rogers, K., Milobowski, M., Wooldridge, B.: Perspectives on ammonia injection and gaseous static mixing in SCR retrofit applications. In: Proceedings of the EPRI-DOE-EPA Combined Utility Air Pollutant Control Symposium, Atlanta, Georgia (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rubin, E., Salmento, J., Frey, H.: Cost-effective emission controls for coal-fired power plants. Chem. Eng. Commun. 74, 155–167 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rubin, E., Kalagnanam, J., Frey, H., Berkenpas, M.: Integrated environmental control concepts for coal-fired power plants. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 47(11), 1180–1188 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Staudt, J., Engelmeyer, A.: SCR catalyst management strategies-modeling and experience. In: Proceedings of the DOE-EPRI-EPA-AWMA Power Plant Air Pollutant Control Mega Symposium: DOE/EPRI/EPA/AWMA, Washington, DC (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tennessee Valley Authority: Coal-fired power plant. http://www.tva.gov/power/coalart.htm

  21. The U.S. Department of Energy and Southern Company Services, Inc.: Topical report number 9, control of nitrogen oxide emissions: Selective catalyst reduction (SCR). http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/cctc/topicalreports/pdfs/topical9.pdf (1997)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Passakorn Phananiramai.

Additional information

Patent pending.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Phananiramai, P., Rosenberger, J.M., Chen, V.C.P. et al. A mathematical optimization technique for managing selective catalytic reduction for coal-fired power plants. Energy Syst 2, 171–188 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-011-0030-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12667-011-0030-0

Keywords

Navigation