Skip to main content
Log in

Strain Amplitude and Temperature Effects on the Low Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Alloy 617M

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present investigation, comparative evaluation of the low cycle fatigue (LCF) of tube and forged Alloy 617M have been studied. Total axial strain controlled tests were performed on sub-sized specimens between 300 and 1023 K employing strain amplitudes ranging from ±0.25 to ±1 % at a nominal strain rate of 3 × 10−3 s−1. The alloy underwent cyclic hardening at all temperatures and strain amplitudes and the rate of hardening was sensitive to both temperature and strain amplitude. There were distinct differences in the LCF behavior of forged and tube products. The forged alloy exhibited better fatigue life than that of tube material and significant difference in the rate of hardening was observed between the material conditions at 1023 K. The variation in the LCF behavior of the two products was found to be associated with the difference in the initial microstructure. The grains of the tube product were equiaxed having 214 μm average size whereas a distribution of both large grains (average 65 μm) and clusters of small grains (average 15 μm) were found in the forged product. Microstructural investigations revealed mixed mode of failure for both the product forms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alok M, Bhutani O P, Jayakumar T, Dubey D K, and Chetal S C, in Proceedings of Seventh International Conference on Advances in Materials Technology for Fossil Power plants, Electric Power Research Institute, USA (2013) p 53.

  2. ASME, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Part B, SB-166 and 167 (2013) p 207.

  3. Bhanu Sankara Rao K, Schiffers H, Schuster H, and Nickel H, Met Trans A 19 (1988) p 359.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Srivastava S K, and Klarstrom O L, in Proceedings of Conference on Gas Turbines, ASME (1990) 90-GT-80.

  5. Wright J K, Carroll L J, Simpson J A, and Wright R N, J Eng Mater Technol 135 (2013) p 031005-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Maier G, Riedel H, and Somsen C, Int J Fatigue 55 (2013) p 126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. ASTM Designation E 606-80, Part 10 (1980) p 694.

  8. Kim S J, Choi P H, Dewa R T, Kim W G, and Kim M H, Proc Mater Sci 3 (2014) p 2201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chai G, Liu P, and Frodigh J, J Mater Sci 39 (2004) p 2689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo X G, Guo J T, Yuan C, and Yang H C, in Proceedings of the Eighth Liege Conference on Materials for Advanced Power Engineering (2006) p 403.

  11. Cornet C, Wackermann K, Stocker C, Christ H -J, Lupton C, Hardy M, and Tong J, Mater High Temp 31 (2014) p 226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Burke M A, and Beck C G, Met Trans A 15 (1984) p 661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Mariappan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mariappan, K., Shankar, V., Goyal, S. et al. Strain Amplitude and Temperature Effects on the Low Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Alloy 617M. Trans Indian Inst Met 69, 325–329 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-015-0784-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-015-0784-5

Keywords

Navigation