Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling and Optimization of Tool Wear in a Passively Damped Boring process using Response Surface Methodology

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Regenerative chatter in machining process is a root cause for tool wear and poor surface finish resulting in low production rate. Hence research has to be focused to identify an opportunity to suppress these chatters. This investigation is attempted to reduce the tool wear in boring process by incorporation of shape memory alloy (SMA) mass dampers in boring tool. The copper and Zinc based SMA mass dampers were placed at various position of boring bar and the effect of damper position and machining parameters on the tool wear was studied. Boring process was carried out on grey cast iron pipe by varying the damper position (54, 64 and 74 mm), cutting velocity (25, 50 and 75 m/min) and depth of cut (0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 mm). The prediction model was developed to correlate the relationship between machining parameters and tool wear. The optimum damper position and machining parameters to minimize the tool wear was determined using response surface methodology (RSM). The confirmation test on the optimized value has witnessed efficient prediction of the damper position and machining parameters for reduced tool wear in boring process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tlusty J, Manufacturing and Process Equipment, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River; ISBN: 0-201-49865-0 (1999).

  2. Altintas Y, Manufacturing Automation, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tobias S A, Machine-Tool Vibration, Blackie, London (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ema S, and Marui E, Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40 (2000) 1141–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chung D D L, J Mater Sci 36 (2001) 5733–5737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Atabey F, Lazoglu I, and Altintas Y, Int J Mach Tools Manuf Design Res Appl 43 (2003) 477–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cardi A A, Firpi H A, Bement M T, and Liang S Y, Mech Syst Signal Process 22 (2008) 1481–1494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Quintana G, and Ciurana J, Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51 (2011) 363–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ramesh K, Alwarsamy T, and Jayabal S, Int J Mater Prod Technol 46 (2013) 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Natarajan U, Periyanan P R, and Yang S H, Int J Adv Manuf Technol 56 (2011) 177–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ozlu E, and Budak E, Trans ASME, 129 (2007) 726.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fu Q, Lundin D, and Nicolescu C M, J Mater Eng Perform 23 (2014) 506–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Karunya University, Coimbatore for providing the experimental set up to carry out this investigation. The authors would also like to thank S. Balasubramanain, Omega Inspection and Analytical laboratory, Chennai for his valuable suggestion to carry out this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Chockalingam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chockalingam, S., Natarajan, U. & Kalyana Sundaram, S. Modeling and Optimization of Tool Wear in a Passively Damped Boring process using Response Surface Methodology. Trans Indian Inst Met 69, 1443–1448 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-015-0707-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-015-0707-5

Keywords

Navigation