Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bimetallic Castings in a Chromium–Nickel Stainless Steel Working Surface Layer Configuration with a Grey Cast Iron Base

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents the problem of obtaining a permanent diffusion joint between the working surface layer and the base part in a bimetallic casting. The bimetallic castings studied here were obtained as a result of using the founding method of layer coating directly in the cast process, i.e., the so-called method of mould cavity preparation by monolithic insert. The castings prepared using this method consist of two fundamental parts, i.e., the base which constitutes typical foundry material, i.e., grey cast iron and the working surface layer which constitutes plate of chromium–nickel stainless steels, X2CrNi 18-9 and X2CrNiMoN22-5-3 grade. On the basis of the obtained results it was confirmed that the decisive phenomena that are needed to create a permanent joint between the two components of the bimetallic casting are carbon and heat transport in the direction from the high-carbon and hot base material which was poured into the mould in the form of liquid metal to the low-carbon and cold material of the working layer which was placed in the mould cavity in the form of a monolithic insert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Žic S, Džambas I, and Konić M, Metalurgija 48 (2009) 51.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hua W, Adv Mater Res 535-537 (2012) 266.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xiaofeng X, Shengping Y, Xiaoguang Z, and Qiong X, China Foundry 9 (2012) 136.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marukovich E, Branovitsky A, Na Y, Lee J, and Choi K, Mater Des 27 (2006) 1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Heijkoop T, and Sare I, Cast Met 2 (1989) 160.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gawroński J, Szajnar J, and Wróbel P, J Mater Process Technol 157–158 (2004) 679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Szajnar J, Wróbel P, and Wróbel T, Arch Foundry Eng 8 (2008) 105.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wróbel T, in Proc METAL 2011 20th Anniversary International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials, (eds) Podjuklová J and Štěpánek I, Tanger, Brno (2011), p 758.

  9. Jura S, and Suchoń J, Solidif Met Alloys 24 (1995) 67 (in Polish).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bartocha D, Suchoń J, and Jura S, Solidif Met Alloys 38 (1998) 151 (in Polish).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Qian M, Harada S, Kuroshima Y, and Nagayoshi H, Mater Sci Eng A A208 (1996) 88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Arnold B, Heijkoop T, Lloyd P, Rubens G, and Sare I, Wear 203–204 (1997) 663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kilarski J, and Suchoń J, Arch Foundry 6 (2006) 266.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Şimşir M, Kumruoğlu L, and Özer A, Mater Des 30 (2009) 264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cingi C, Rauta V, Niani E, and Orkas J, Mater Sci Forum 654–656 (2010) 2712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xiong B, Cai C, and Lu B, J Alloy Compd 509 (2011) 6700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xiong B, Cai C, Wan H, and Lu B, Mater Des 32 (2011) 2978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Viala J, Peronnet M, Barbeau F, Bosselet F, and Bouix J, Composites A 33 (2002) 1417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Szymczak T, Arch Foundry Eng 11 (2011) 215.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lucey T, Wuhrer R, Moran K, Reid M, Huggett P, and Cortie M, J Mater Process Technol 212 (2012) 2349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cholewa M, Wróbel T, Tenerowicz S, and Szuter T, Arch Metall Mater 55 (2010) 771.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wróbel T, Cholewa M, and Tenerowicz S, Arch Foundry Eng 11 (2011) 105.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wróbel T, J Mater Eng Perform 23 (2014) 1711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Duda P, and Taler J, Solving Direct and Inverse Heat Conduction Problems, Springer, Berlin (2006), p 363.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The financial support from the Polish National Science Centre is kindly acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Foundry Department, Silesian University of Technology, Towarowa 7, 44-100, Gliwice, Poland

    Tomasz Wróbel

  2. Institute for Ferrous Metallurgy, Karola Miarki 12-14, 44-100, Gliwice, Poland

    Jerzy Wiedermann & Piotr Skupień

Authors
  1. Tomasz Wróbel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jerzy Wiedermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Piotr Skupień
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomasz Wróbel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wróbel, T., Wiedermann, J. & Skupień, P. Bimetallic Castings in a Chromium–Nickel Stainless Steel Working Surface Layer Configuration with a Grey Cast Iron Base. Trans Indian Inst Met 68, 571–580 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-014-0488-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-014-0488-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation