Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of Surface Roughness in Turning of EN 353 Using Response Surface Methodology

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present work, an attempt has been made to investigate the influence of cutting speed, feed, depth of cut and nose radius on surface roughness during wet turning of EN 353 steel using tungsten carbide inserts. Surface roughness prediction models in terms of speed, feed, depth of cut and nose radius is developed by using response surface methodology based on center composite rotatable design. A comparison of first order models with quadratic model was carried out on the basis of percentage mean absolute error and mean square error. The results clearly reveals that the predicted data using quadratic model is in close agreement to the experimental surface roughness values as compared to predicted data using first order model. In addition to this, it has been revealed that the speed is the main influencing factor affecting the surface roughness. The depth of cut has no significant influence on the roughness. Mathematical model for surface roughness shows that surface roughness decreases with increase in speed and nose radius, but increases with increase in feed. The percentage variation between the predicted and experimental values of the surface roughness during the confirmation experiments was found within 5 %. An attempt has also been made to obtain optimum cutting conditions for minimum surface roughness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gopalsamy B M, Mondal B, and Ghosh S, J Sci Ind Res 68 (2009) 686.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mandal N, Doloi B, and Mondal B, Int J Refract Met H 29 (2011) 273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mandal N, Doloi B, and Mondal B, Int J Refract Met H 38 (2013) 40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Choudhury I A, and EI-Baradie M A, J Mater Process Technol 67 (1997) 55.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abouelatta O B, and Madl J, J Mater Process Technol 118 (2001) 269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aslan E, Camuscu N, and Birgoren B, J Mater Des 28 (2006) 1618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nalbant M, Gokkaya H, and Sur G, J Mater Des, 28 (2006) 1379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhattacharya A, Das S, Majumder P, and Batish A, Int J Prod Eng Res Devel 3 (2009) 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sahoo A K, and Sahoo B, Int J Indus Eng Computation 2 (2011) 819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Suresh P V S, Rao P V, and Deshmukh S G, Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42 (2002) 675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Noordin M Y, Venkatesh V C, Sharif S, Elting S, and Abdullah A, J Mater Process Technol 145 (2003) 46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh D, and Rao P V, Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32 (2005) 1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Manna A, and Salodkar S, J Mater Process Technol 203 (2007) 147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Galanis N I, and Manolakos D E, Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51 (2010) 79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen C C, Chiang K T, Chou C C, and Liao Y C, Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54 (2011) 465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ozel T, Hsu T K, and Zeren E, Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25 (2003) 262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ozel T, Correia A E, and Davim J P, Int J Mater Prod Tec 35 (2009) 264.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Montgomery D C Design and Analysis of Experiments, (5th ed), Wiley, New York, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pradeep K. Singh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bhardwaj, B., Kumar, R. & Singh, P.K. Prediction of Surface Roughness in Turning of EN 353 Using Response Surface Methodology. Trans Indian Inst Met 67, 305–313 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-013-0346-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-013-0346-7

Keywords

Navigation