Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of microstructure on creep and creep crack growth behaviour of titanium alloy

  • Published:
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Creep and creep crack growth behaviour of a near α titanium alloy has been investigated at 600°C which is affected by primary α content. The alloy was heat treated at different temperatures so as to obtain different levels of equiaxed primary α in the range from 5 to 24 %. Constant load creep tests were carried out at 600°C in the stress range 250 to 400 MPa till rupture of the specimens. Creep crack growth tests were carried out at 600°C. Creep data reveals with increase in primary α content leads to creep weakening. On similar lines maximum creep crack growth resistance is associated with the alloy with lowest primary α content. Microstructural and fractographic examination has revealed that creep fracture occurs by nucleation, growth and coalescence of microvoids nucleated at primary β / transformed β (matrix) interfaces. On the other hand, creep crack growth occurs by surface cracks nucleated by fracture of primary α particles as well as by growth and coalescence of microvoids nucleated at primary β / transformed β (matrix) interfaces in the interior of the specimen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ohji K, Ogura K and Kubo S, JSME, No. 790-13, (1979) 18 (In Japanese).

  2. Andres C, Gysler A and Lutjering G, Z.Metallkd. 88 (1997) 197.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mishra H, Ghosal P, Nandy T K and Sagar P K, Mater.Sci.Eng.A 399 (2005) 222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Satyanarayana D V V, Omprakash C M, Vikas Kumar, In press Metall. Mat. Trans. A, (2008).

  5. Borchert B, Daubler M A, Proceedings of the Sixth World Conference on Titanium, France, (1988) 467.

  6. Lutjering G, Helm D, Daubler M A, Proceedings of the fifth World Conference on Fatigue and Fatigue Thresholds, Canada, (1993) 165.

  7. Cope M T, M.J. Hill, Proceedings of the Sixth World Conference on Titanium, France, (1988) 153.

  8. Kestler H, Mughrabi H and Renner H, Titanium’95 Science and Technology, (1995) 1171.

  9. Neal D F, Titanium Science and Technology, (1985) 2419.

  10. Thiehsen K E, Kassner M E, Pollard J, Hiatt D R, Bristow B M, Metall. Trans. 24A (1993) 1819.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ankem S and Seagle S R, Titanium Science and Technology, (1985) 2411.

  12. Bania P J and Hall J A, Titanium Science and Technology, (1985) 2371.

  13. Woodfield A P, Wardle A M and Loretto M H, Proceedings of the Sixth World Conference on Titanium, France, (1988) 357.

  14. Cho W, Jones J W, Allison J E and Donion W T, Proceedings of the Sixth World Conference on Titanium, France, (1988) 187–197.

  15. “Standard Test Method for Measurement of Creep Crack Growth Rates in Metals: ASTM standard 1457-92. ASTM Book of Standards, 03.01 (1992) 1031.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. M. Omprakash.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Omprakash, C.M., Satyanarayana, D.V.V. & Kumar, V. Effect of microstructure on creep and creep crack growth behaviour of titanium alloy. Trans Indian Inst Met 63, 457–459 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-010-0064-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-010-0064-3

Keywords

Navigation