Abstract
Asymmetrical large deformation problem of quartz mica schist is anticipated in a planning hydropower station. The objective of this study was to investigate the anisotropic mechanical properties of the schist under complex stress states. For this purpose, a series of true triaxial compression tests accompanied by acoustic emission monitoring were carried out on this schist with different loading angles with respect to inherent schistosity. The test results show that the orientation of schistosity and stress state have a significant impact on the deformation, strength and failure of this schist. More specifically, when the σ2 is parallel to the strike of the schistosity (ω = 0°), the failure of the specimen is mainly controlled by the schistosity structure, and the strength is lower compared with the case of σ2 perpendicular to the strike (ω = 90°). When ω = 90°, the deformation normal to schistosity is more restrained, and the acoustic emission impact mostly presents the phenomenon of concentration and sudden increase during the fracture. The test results indicate that the normal stress constraint effect on the schistosity can effectively improve the strength and inhibit the shear or splitting failure along the schistosity, hence, the tunnel axis should be at a large angle with the strike of schistosity, and support measures should be applied on schistosity as soon as possible after excavation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author.
References
Aggelis DG (2011) Classification of cracking mode in concrete by acoustic emission parameters. Geomech Eng 38(3):153–157. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2019.18.2.215
Bai Q, Young RP (2019) Numerical investigation of the mechanical and damage behaviors of veined gneiss during true-triaxial stress path loading by simulation of in situ conditions. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53:133–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01898-2
Cai M (2008) Influence of intermediate principal stress on rock fracturing and strength near excavation boundaries—Insight from numerical modeling. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45(5):763–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.07.026
Elfergani HE, Pullin R, Holford K (2013) Damage assessment of corrosion in prestressed concrete by acoustic emission. Constr Build Mater 40(3):925–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.071
Feng XT, Haimson B, Li XC, Chang CD, Ma XD, Zhang XW, Ingraham M, Suzuki K (2019) ISRM Suggested Method: determining deformation and failure characteristics of rocks subjected to true triaxial compression. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52(6):2011–2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01782-z
Feng XT, Yu XJ, Zhou YY, Yang CX, Wang FY (2023) A rigid true triaxial apparatus for analyses of deformation and failure features of deep weak rock under excavation stress paths. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.08.009
Fereidooni D, Khanlari G, Heidari M, Sepahigero A, Kolahi-Azar A (2016) Assessment of inherent anisotropy and confining pressure influences on mechanical behavior of anisotropic foliated rocks under triaxial compression. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(6):2155–2163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0814-y
Gou B, Zhang Y (2009) Research on the control technology for large deformation of carbon schist of Xinshuhe Tunnel. Chin J Railway Eng Society 26(11):40–44. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-2106.2009.11.010
Karampinos E, Hadjigeorgiou J (2017) Quantifying the influence of structure, rock mass strength and mining development of drives in squeezing ground. Min Technol 127(4):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14749009.2017.1409983
Kim KY, Zhuang L, Yang HY, Kim H, Min K (2016) Strength anisotropy of Berea sandstone: results of X-Ray computed tomography, compression tests, and discrete modeling. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(4):1201–1210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0820-0
Kwaśniewski M, Mogi K (2000) Faulting in an anisotropic, schistose rock under general triaxial compression. In: Proceedings of 4th North American Rock Mech Symp, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 737–746
Li XB, Du K, Li DY (2015) True Triaxial strength and failure modes of cubic rock specimens with unloading the minor principal stress. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48(6):2185–2196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-014-0701-y
Liu JJ, Yang M, Wang D, Zhang JH (2018) Different bedding loaded coal mechanics properties and acoustic emission. Environ Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7504-5
Liu YB, Yin GZ, Li MH, Zhang DM, Huang G, Liu P, Liu C, Zhao HG, Yu BC (2020) Mechanical properties and failure behavior of dry and water-saturated anisotropic coal under true-triaxial loading conditions. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53(11):4799–4818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-02035-9
Mezger F, Anagnostou G, Ziegler H (2013) The excavation-induced convergences in the Sedrun section of the Gotthard Base Tunnel. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 38(09):447–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2013.07.016
Mogi K (2006) Experimental rock mechanics. Taylor and Francis, London
Nasseri MHB, Rao K, Ramamurthy T (2003) Anisotropic strength and deformational behavior of Himalayan schists. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40(1):3–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00103-X
Rybacki E, Meier T, Dresen G (2016) What controls the mechanical properties of shale rocks?—part ii: brittleness. J Petrol Sci Eng 144:39–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.02.022
Steiner W (1996) Tunnelling in squeezing rocks: case histories. Rock Mech Rock Eng 29(4):211–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01042534
Sun B, Ren F, Wang H (2022) Experimental investigation on anisotropic characteristics of carbonaceous slate under uniaxial compression. Environ Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-022-10535-1
Xu Y, Chen JP, Zuo CQ (2013) Shear type longitudinal cracks failure mechanism in Wudang group of schist tunnel. Chin J Cent South Univ 44(07):2950–2957 (CNKI:SUN:ZNGD.0.2013-07-045)
Xu GW, He C, Su A, Chen ZQ (2018) Experimental investigation of the anisotropic mechanical behavior of phyllite under triaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 104:100–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.02.017
Zhang XP, Wong LNY, Wang SJ, Han GY (2011) Engineering properties of quartz mica schist. Eng Geol 121(3–4):135–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.04.020
Zheng Z, Tang H, Zhang Q, Pan PZ, Zhang XW, Mei GX, Zaobao L, Wang W(2023) True triaxial test and PFC3D-GBM simulation study on mechanical properties and fracture evolution mechanisms of rock under high stresses. Comput Geotech. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.105136
Zhou YY, Xu DP, Gu GK, Liu K, Wan LP, Wang TL, Yang JB (2019) The failure mechanism and construction practice of large underground caverns in steeply dipping layered rock masses. Eng Geol 250:45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.01.006
Zhuo X, Liu XJ, Shi XC, Liang LX, Xiong J (2022) The anisotropic mechanical characteristics of layered rocks under numerical simulation. J Pet Explor Prod Technol 12(1):51–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-021-01388-8
Funding
Chinese Natural Science Foundation with the Grant Nos. 52079027, 51709043.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Xufeng Liu and Yangyi Zhou wrote the main manuscript text. Dingping Xu wrote the rock mass failure part. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, X., Zhou, Y. & Xu, D. Anisotropic mechanical properties of quartz mica schist subjected to true triaxial compression. Environ Earth Sci 82, 204 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-10886-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-10886-3