Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bayesian networks model for identification of the effective variables in the forecasting of debris flows occurrence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Comprehensive assessment of debris flow hazards is a challenging issue due to the complexity and uncertainty of its factors. For this reason, the practical forecasting of debris flows requires developing a reliable and realistic forecasting model. In this paper, a Bayesian Networks (BNs) model is proposed for identification of debris flows events in the northern basins of Iran. BNs model illustrates the uncertainty of the results as probability percentage of debris flow occurrence in different categories (non-occurrence, occurrence with low-intensity and occurrence with high-intensity). In this research, average basin elevation, average basin slope, watershed area, the current rainfall, antecedent rainfalls of 3-day ago and discharge of 1-day ago were used as the predictor variables. Moreover, K-means clustering method was applied in modeling by the BNs model. To identify the effective predictors in debris flow occurrence, sensitivity analysis was performed. For this purpose, scenarios which employ various predictor variables were tested. The scenario which uses all predictor variables has a forecasting accuracy of 91%. This scenario was selected as the best scenario. However, a scenario which employs only effective predictors also proposed for practical uses. The results of the various forecasting scenarios showed that average basin elevation, watershed area, current rainfall and discharge of 1-day ago are the effective predictors in the forecasting debris flows. The BNs model may be proposed for future tests in the other debris flow prone regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguilera P, Fernández A, Fernández R, Rumí R, Salmerón A (2011) Bayesian networks in environmental modelling. Environ Modell Softwr 26(12):1376–1388

    Google Scholar 

  • Anbari MJ, Tabesh M, Roozbahani A (2017) Risk assessment model to prioritize sewer pipes inspection in wastewater collection networks. J Environ Manag 190:91–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Babaei M, Moeini R, Ehsanzadeh E (2019) Artificial neural network and support vector machine models for inflow prediction of dam reservoir (case study: Zayandehroud Dam Reservoir). Water Resour Manag 33(6):2203–2218

    Google Scholar 

  • Bafitlhile TM, Li Z (2019) Applicability of ε-support vector machine and artificial neural network for flood forecasting in humid, semi-humid and semi-arid basins in China. Water 11(1):85

    Google Scholar 

  • Banihabib M, Elahi M (2009) Empirical equation for abrasion of stilling basin caused by impact of sediment, world environmental and water resources congress 2009@ sgreat rivers. ASCE, pp 3481–3490

  • Banihabib ME (1999) Hydraulic roughness of flow with high concentrations of sediment. In: 2nd Conference Hydraulic Tehran, Iran

  • Banihabib ME (2002) Mud flow and debris. In: Proceeding of conference of prevent and reduce of flood risks, Gorgan, Iran, pp 1–8

  • Banihabib ME, Arabi A (2016) The impact of catchment management on emergency management of flash-flood. Int J Emerg Manag 12(2):185–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Banihabib ME, Arabi A, Salha AA (2015) A dynamic artificial neural network for assessment of land-use change impact on warning lead-time of flood. Int J Hydrol Sci Technol 5(2):163–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Banihabib ME, Bahram E (2009) Experimental analyses of sedimentation in the slit dam Reservoir. In: World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2009: Great Rivers, pp. 1–12.

  • Banihabib ME, Forghani A (2017) An assessment framework for the mitigation effects of check dams on debris flow. CATENA 152:277–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Banihabib ME, Masumi A (2008) Effect of high-concentrated sediment transport on inundation of rivers: case study masuleh flood. In: Iranian Hydraulic Conference, pp 166–173

  • Bergmann K, Kopp S (2009) GNetIc–using bayesian decision networks for iconic gesture generation. In: International workshop on intelligent virtual agents. Springer, pp 76–89

  • Borsuk ME, Stow CA, Reckhow KH (2004) A Bayesian network of eutrophication models for synthesis, prediction, and uncertainty analysis. Ecol Model 173(2–3):219–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley J, Jackson NA, Clymer O, Giacomello AM, Jensen FV (2005) The use of Hugin® to develop Bayesian networks as an aid to integrated water resource planning. Environ Modell Softw 20(2):231–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang T-C, Chao R-J (2006) Application of back-propagation networks in debris flow prediction. Eng Geol 85(3):270–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang T-C, Chien Y-H (2007) The application of genetic algorithm in debris flows prediction. Environ Geol 53(2):339–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang T-C, Wang Z-Y, Chien Y-H (2010) Hazard assessment model for debris flow prediction. Environ Earth Sci 60(8):1619–1630

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahimy E, Rozbahany A, Kardan Moghadam H (2015) Analysis of uncertainty effective parameters on forecasting the groundwater level with Bayesian network approach. In: Shahid Beheshti conference, Tehran, Iran, pp 1–10

  • Ghorbani MA, Zadeh HA, Isazadeh M, Terzi O (2016) A comparative study of artificial neural network (MLP, RBF) and support vector machine models for river flow prediction. Environ Earth Sci 75(6):476

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu T, Pung HK, Zhang DQ, Pung HK, Zhang DQ (2004) A bayesian approach for dealing with uncertain contexts. na

  • Han S, Coulibaly P (2017) Bayesian flood forecasting methods: a review. J Hydrol 551:340–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan-Esfahani L, Banihabib ME (2016) The impact of slit and detention dams on debris flow control using GSTARS 3.0. Environ Earth Sci 75(4):328

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesar AS, Tabatabaee H, Jalali M (2012) Monthly rainfall forecasting using Bayesian belief networks. Int Res J Appl Basic Sci 3(11):2226–2231

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirano M, Harada T, Banihabib ME, Kawahara K (1997) Estimation of hazard area due to debris flow, Debris–Flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction, and assessment. ASCE, Reston, pp 697–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirano M, Moriyama T, Kawahara K (1995) prediction of the occurrence of Debris flow and a runoff analysis by the use of neural networks. J Nat Disaster Sci 17(2):53–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang F, Chen L, Yin K, Huang J, Gui L (2018a) Object-oriented change detection and damage assessment using high-resolution remote sensing images, Tangjiao Landslide, Three Gorges Reservoir China. Environ Earth Sci 77(5):183

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang F, Yao C, Liu W, Li Y, Liu X (2018b) Landslide susceptibility assessment in the Nantian area of China: a comparison of frequency ratio model and support vector machine. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 9(1):919–938

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugin Expert AS (2012) Hugin API reference manual, Version, 7. Hugin Expert AS, Aalborg

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakob M, Weatherly H (2003) A hydroclimatic threshold for landslide initiation on the North Shore Mountains of Vancouver British Columbia. Geomorphology 54(3):137–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Jianwei Z, Lin L, Yuting Y, Yongxin Z, Eryang C (2015) Debris flow prediction research based on two-dimension Bayesian classifier. In: 2015 IEEE Advanced information technology, electronic and automation control conference (IAEAC). IEEE, pp 793–796

  • Kardan Moghadam H, Roozbahani A (2016) Evaluation of bayesian networks model in the monthly forecasting of groundwater level (Case study Birjand aquifer). Manage Water Irrig 5(2):139–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern AN, Addison P, Oommen T, Salazar SE, Coffman RA (2017) Machine learning based predictive modeling of debris flow probability following wildfire in the intermountain Western United States. Math Geosci 49(6):717–735

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusy M, Kowalski PA (2018) Weighted probabilistic neural network. Inf Sci 430:65–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang W-J, Zhuang D-F, Jiang D, Pan J-J, Ren H-Y (2012) Assessment of debris flow hazards using a Bayesian Network. Geomorphology 171:94–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin J-W, Chen C-W, Peng C-Y (2012) Potential hazard analysis and risk assessment of debris flow by fuzzy modeling. Nat Hazards 64(1):273–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Guo H, Zou R, Wang L (2006) Neural network modeling for regional hazard assessment of debris flow in Lake Qionghai Watershed China. Environ Geol 49(7):968–976

    Google Scholar 

  • Lletı R, Ortiz MC, Sarabia LA, Sánchez MS (2004) Selecting variables for k-means cluster analysis by using a genetic algorithm that optimises the silhouettes. Anal Chim Acta 515(1):87–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Papa M, Medina V, Ciervo F, Bateman A (2012) Estimation of debris flow critical rainfall thresholds by a physically-based model. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 9(11):12797–12824

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl J (1988) Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng M, Zhang L (2012) Analysis of human risks due to dam-break floods—part 1: a new model based on Bayesian networks. Nat Hazards 64(1):903–933

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng S-H (2016) Hazard ratings of Debris flow evacuation sites in hillside communities of Ershui Township, Changhua County Taiwan. Water 8(2):54

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaeianzadeh M, Tabari H, Yazdi AA, Isik S, Kalin L (2014) Flood flow forecasting using ANN, ANFIS and regression models. Neural Comput Appl 25(1):25–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Roozbahani A, Ebrahimi E, Banihabib ME (2018) A framework for ground water management based on bayesian network and MCDM techniques. Water Resour Manag 32(15):4985–5005

    Google Scholar 

  • Ropero RF, Flores MJ, Rumi R, Aguilera PA (2017) Applications of hybrid dynamic Bayesian networks to water reservoir management. Environmetrics 28(1):e2432

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanhapour M, Banihabib ME, Roozbahani A (2018) Bayesian network model for the assessment of the antecedent rain fall effect on Debris flow for casting in Alborz Zone of Iran. Iran Water Resour Res 18(4):118–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Uusitalo L (2007) Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modelling. Ecol Model 203(3):312–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan S, Lei TC (2009) A knowledge-based decision support system to analyze the debris-flow problems at Chen-Yu-Lan River Taiwan. Knowl Based Syst 22(8):580–588

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X-K, Huang E, Cui P (2003) Simulation and prediction of debris flow using artificial neural network. Chin Geogra Sci 13(3):262–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu W, Yu W, Jing S, Zhang G, Huang J (2013) Debris flow susceptibility assessment by GIS and information value model in a large-scale region, Sichuan Province (China). Nat Hazards 65(3):1379–1392

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Liu X, Cai E, Huang G, Ding C (2013) Integration of dynamic rainfall data with environmental factors to forecast debris flow using an improved GMDH model. Comput Geosci 56:23–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang J, Cui P, Wang G, Chen X, Iqbal J, Guo X (2015) Rainfall thresholds for the occurrence of debris flows in the Jiangjia Gully, Yunnan Province, China. Eng Geol 195:335–346

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Ebrahim Banihabib.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Banihabib, M.E., Tanhapour, M. & Roozbahani, A. Bayesian networks model for identification of the effective variables in the forecasting of debris flows occurrence. Environ Earth Sci 79, 179 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-08911-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-08911-w

Keywords

Navigation