Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Hyrcanian forests conservation based on ecosystem services approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lush Hyrcanian mixed temperate forests are globally important ecosystems with considerable ecological and economic values and high variety of ecosystem services (ES). In this study, an ES-based approach is adopted to develop a spatial conservation framework for Gorganrood Watershed, northeastern Iran. In doing so, the integrated valuation of ecosystem services and trade-offs modeling tool was implemented to spatially quantify a collection of five ES including soil retention, habitat quality (as a proxy for biodiversity), water yield, food supply and carbon storage. These services were integrated into a single layer based on the Total Ecosystem Services (TES) index. By performing correlation analyses, the type and the strength of relationships between ES, TES index values and different land features were analyzed to reveal which land-use categories at what locations are more capable to provide bundles of ES. Accordingly, Hyrcanian mixed temperate forests in the southern sub-watersheds of the area were detected to have higher potential for simultaneous provisioning of multiple ES. In addition, we show that biodiversity hotspots and provision of other ES are highly correlated and thus that conservation of one group can be beneficial for the other. Our findings are particularly applicable in areas where complex network of land-uses and limited resources are major barriers against effective conservation of Hyrcanian mixed temperate forests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ai J, Sun X, Feng L, Li Y, Zhu X (2015) Analyzing the spatial patterns and drivers of ecosystem services in rapidly urbanizing Taihu Lake Basin of China. Front Earth Sci 9(3):531–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy

  • Amirnejad H, Khalilian S, Assareh MH, Ahmadian M (2006) Estimating the existence value of north forests of Iran by using a contingent valuation method. Ecol Econ 58(4):665–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagstad KJ, Semmens DJ, Ancona ZH, Sherrouse BC (2016) Evaluating alternative methods for biophysical and cultural ecosystem services hotspot mapping in natural resource planning. Landscape Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10980-016-0430-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai Y, Zhuang C, Ouyang Z, Zheng H, Bo J (2011) Spatial characteristics between biodiversity and ecosystem services in a human-oriented watershed. Ecol Complex 8(2):177–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benayas JMR, Bullock JM (2012) Restoration of biodiversity and ecosystem services on agricultural land. Ecosystems 15(6):883–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett 12(12):1394–1404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Mooney HA, Agard J, Capistrano D, DeFries RS, Díaz S, Dietz T, Duraiappah AK, Oteng-Yeboah A, Pereira HM, Perrings C, Reid WV, Sarukhan J, Scholes RJ, Whyte A (2009) Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(5):1305–1312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cimon-Morin J, Darveau M, Poulin M (2013) Fostering synergies between ecosystem services and biodiversity in conservation planning: a review. Biol Conserv 166:144–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comprehensive Forest Management Report of Gorganrood Watershed. 2015. Published by Forests, Ranges and Watershed Management Organization of the Golestan Province. Gorgan City, Iran

  • Deore MSJ (2005) Prioritization of micro-watersheds of upper Bhama Basin on the basis of soil erosion risk using remote sensing and GIS technology. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pune Pune

  • Diodato N, Bellocchi G (2007) Estimating monthly (R) USLE climate input in a Mediterranean region using limited data. J Hydrol 345(3):224–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue RJ, Roderick ML, McVicar TR (2012) Roots, storms and soil pores: incorporating key ecohydrological processes into Budyko’s hydrological model. J Hydrol 436–437:35–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droogers P, Allen RG (2002) Estimating reference evapotranspiration under inaccurate data conditions. Irrigat Drain Syst 16(1):33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egoh B, Rouget M, Reyers B, Knight AT, Cowling RM, van Jaarsveld AS, Welz A (2007) Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessments: a review. Ecol Econ 63(4):714–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egoh B, Reyers B, Rouget M, Richardson DM, Le Maitre DC, van Jaarsveld AS (2008) Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management. Agric Ecosyst Environ 127(1–2):135–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golestan Province Land-use Planning Report (2013) Published by Gorgan University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, edited by Abdolrassoul Salmanmahiny. Gorgan City, Iran

  • Gregori E, Andrenelli MC, Zorn G (2006) Assessment and classification of climatic aggressiveness with regard to slope instability phenomena connected to hydrological and morphological processes. J Hydrol 329(3):489–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines-Young R, Potschin M (2010) Proposal for a common international classification of ecosystem goods and services (CICES) for integrated environmental and economic accounting. European Environment Agency, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland RA, Eigenbrod F, Armsworth PR, Anderson BJ, Thomas CD, Heinemeyer A, Gillings S, Roy DB, Gaston KJ (2011) Spatial covariation between freshwater and terrestrial ecosystem services. Ecol Appl 21(6):2034–2048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2006) IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, volume 4: agriculture, forestry and other land use. In: Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (eds) Prepared by the national greenhouse gas inventories programme. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Hayama. http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/vol4.html

  • Kareiva P, Tallis H, Ricketts TH, Daily GC, Polasky S (2011) Natural capital: theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kouli M, Soupios P, Vallianatos F (2009) Soil erosion prediction using the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) in a GIS framework, Chania, Northwestern Crete, Greece. Environ Geol 57(3):483–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landuyt D, Broekx S, Goethals PL (2016) Bayesian belief networks to analyse trade-offs among ecosystem services at the regional scale. Ecol Ind 71:327–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larigauderie A, Prieur-Richard A-H, Mace GM, Lonsdale M, Mooney HA, Brussaard L, Cooper D, Cramer W, Daszak P, Díaz S, Duraiappah A, Elmqvist T, Faith DP, Jackson LE, Krug C, Leadley PW, Le Prestre P, Matsuda H, Palmer M, Perrings C, Pulleman M, Reyers B, Rosa EA, Scholes RJ, Spehn E, Turner Ii B, Yahara T (2012) Biodiversity and ecosystem services science for a sustainable planet: the DIVERSITAS vision for 2012–20. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 4(1):101–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laterra P, Orúe ME, Booman GC (2012) Spatial complexity and ecosystem services in rural landscapes. Agr Ecosyst Environ 154:56–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leh MD, Matlock MD, Cummings EC, Nalley LL (2013) Quantifying and mapping multiple ecosystem services change in West Africa. Agr Ecosyst Environ 165:6–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loureiro N, de Azevedo Coutinho M (2001) A new procedure to estimate the RUSLE EI 30 index, based on monthly rainfall data and applied to the Algarve region, Portugal. J Hydrol 250(1):12–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahiny AS, Clarke KC (2012) Guiding SLEUTH land-use/land-cover change modeling using multicriteria evaluation: towards dynamic sustainable land-use planning. Environ Plan 39(5):925–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahiny AS, Clarke KC (2013) Simulating hydrologic impacts of urban growth using SLEUTH, multi Criteria evaluation and runoff modeling. J Environ Inform 22(1):27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405(6783):243–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: scenarios: findings of the Scenarios Working Group, vol 2. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Nachtergaele FO, van Velthuizen H, Verelst L, Batjes NH, Dijkshoorn JA, van Engelen VWP, Fischer G, Jones A, Montanarella L, Petri M, Prieler S (2008) Harmonized world soil database (version 1.0). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemec K, Raudsepp-Hearne C (2013) The use of geographic information systems to map and assess ecosystem services. Biodivers Conserv 22(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan Y, Xu Z, Wu J (2013) Spatial differences of the supply of multiple ecosystem services and the environmental and land use factors affecting them. Ecosyst Serv 5:4–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polasky S, Nelson E, Pennington D, Johnson KA (2011) The impact of land-use change on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: a case study in the State of Minnesota. Environ Resource Econ 48(2):219–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretty JN, Noble AD, Bossio D, Dixon J, Hine RE, Penning de Vries FW, Morison JI (2006) Resource-conserving agriculture increases yields in developing countries. Environ Sci Technol 40(4):1114–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin K, Li J, Yang X (2015) Trade-off and synergy among ecosystem services in the Guanzhong-Tianshui Economic Region of China. Int J Environ Res Publ Health 12(11):14094–14113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2010) Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(11):5242–5247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard KG, Freimund JR (1994) Using monthly precipitation data to estimate the R-factor in the revised USLE. J Hydrol 157(1):287–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, McCool DK, Yoder DC (1997) Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE), vol 703. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Roose E (1996) Land husbandry: components and strategy, vol 70. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakieh Y, Salmanmahiny A, Jafarnezhad J, Mehri A, Kamyab H, Galdavi S (2015) Evaluating the strategy of decentralized urban land-use planning in a developing region. Land Use Policy 48:534–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakieh Y, Salmanmahiny A, Mirkarimi SH, Saeidi S (2016) Measuring the relationships between landscape aesthetics suitability and spatial patterns of urbanized lands: an informed modelling framework for developing urban growth scenarios. Geocarto Int. doi:10.1080/10106049.2016.1178817

    Google Scholar 

  • Samani Z (2000) Estimating solar radiation and evapotranspiration using minimum climatological data. J Irrig Drain Eng 126(4):265–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröter M, Remme RP (2016) Spatial prioritization for conserving ecosystem services: comparing hotspots with heuristic optimization. Landscape Ecol 31(2):431–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp R, Chaplin-Kramer R, Wood S, Guerry A, Tallis H, Taylor R (2014) InVEST user’s guide: integrated valuation of environmental services and tradeoffs. The Natural Capital Project, Standford

    Google Scholar 

  • Su C, Fu B (2013) Evolution of ecosystem services in the Chinese Loess Plateau under climatic and land use changes. Global Planet Change 101:119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner WR, Brandon K, Brooks TM, Costanza R, da Fonseca GAB, Portela R (2007) Global conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Bioscience 57(10):868–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winchell M, Srinivasan R, Di Luzio M, Arnold J (2010) ArcSWAT interface for SWAT 2009 user’s guide. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station and United States Department of Agriculture, Temple

    Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses - A guide to conservation planning. In: Predicting rainfall erosion losses - A guide to conservation planning. Department of Agriculture, USA, pp 1–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Feng Z, Gao Y, Peng J (2013) Hotspot and relationship identification in multiple landscape services: a case study on an area with intensive human activities. Ecol Ind 29:529–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Yang D, Lei Z, Sun F (2008) New analytical derivation of the mean annual water-energy balance equation. Water Resour Rese 44(3):W03410. doi:10.1029/2007WR006135

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarandian A, Baral H, Stork NE, Ling MA, Yavari AR, Jafari HR, Amirnejad H (2017) Modeling ecosystem services informs spatial planning in lands adjacent to Sarvelat and Javaherdasht protected area in northern Iran. Land Use Policy 61:487–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Hickel K, Dawes WR, Chiew FHS, Western AW, Briggs PR (2004) A rational function approach for estimating mean annual evapotranspiration. Water Resour Rese 40(1):W02502. doi:10.1029/2003WR002710

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of the Environmental Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Basij Square, Gorgan, Golestan Provice, Iran

    Zahra Asadolahi, Abdolrassoul Salmanmahiny & Yousef Sakieh

Authors
  1. Zahra Asadolahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdolrassoul Salmanmahiny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yousef Sakieh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zahra Asadolahi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 903 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Asadolahi, Z., Salmanmahiny, A. & Sakieh, Y. Hyrcanian forests conservation based on ecosystem services approach. Environ Earth Sci 76, 365 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6702-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6702-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation