Abstract
A practical issue is present in sustaining and rehabilitating the ecologically vulnerable post-mining area in which the environmental condition varies spatially and therefore influenced by multiple factors. This paper attempts to integrate the ecological vulnerability assessment and rehabilitation treatment to assist land managers in revealing vulnerable features along with developing treatments of vulnerability mitigation. Using a post-mining site in a mountainous area in western China as study area, an indicator system and framework for assessing and reducing vulnerability were developed based on a vulnerability analysis. Geo-informatics, such as satellite image processing and spatial analysis, were employed to perform the assessment and planning. It was found that higher exposure and sensitivity are the main causes of increased vulnerability in a seriously disturbed post-mining area. Rehabilitation treatments were arranged spatially and structurally based on the framework of vulnerability mitigation. A pre-evaluation of the effectiveness shows this type of rehabilitation has a convergence effect that clusters and lowers the ecological vulnerability index (EVI). The average value of EVI will be reduced by 15.02% if the minimum standards of rehabilitation can be completed. Altogether, an integration of rehabilitation treatments and the quantification of vulnerability in a spatially explicit manner are critical for planners to gain more insight into ecological vulnerability in post-mining area, which provides guidance to simplify rehabilitation planning with respect to vulnerability mitigation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16:268–281. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006
Antwi EK, Krawczynski R, Wiegleb G (2008) Detecting the effect of disturbance on habitat diversity and land cover change in a post-mining area using GIS. Landsc Urban Plan 87:22–32. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.03.009
Banks G (2016) Mining and natural hazard vulnerability in the Philippines: digging to development or digging to disaster? Aust Geogr 47:125–126. doi:10.1080/00049182.2015.1108242
Bell L (2001) Establishment of native ecosystems after mining-Australian experience across diverse biogeographic zones. Ecol Eng 17:179–186. doi:10.1016/s0925-8574(00)00157-9
Berkes F (2012) Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: lessons from resilience thinking. Disaster Risk Vulnerab. doi:10.1007/s11069-006-9036-7
Beroya-Eitner MA (2016) Ecological vulnerability indicators. Ecol Indic 60:329–334. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.07.001
Bian Z, Miao X, Lei S, S-e Chen, Wang W, Struthers S (2012) The challenges of reusing mining and mineral-processing wastes. Science 337:702–703. doi:10.1126/science.1224757
Birkmann J (2006) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient societies, vol 363.34 M484m. United Nations University, New York
Birkmann J, Wisner B (2006) Measuring the un-measurable: the challenge of vulnerability. UNU-EHS, Bonn. http://www.ehs.unu.edu/file.php?id=212S
Blachowski J (2016) Application of GIS spatial regression methods in assessment of land subsidence in complicated mining conditions: case study of the Walbrzych coal mine (SW Poland). Nat Hazards 84:997–1014. doi:10.1007/s11069-016-2470-2
Bullock JM, Aronson J, Newton AC, Pywell RF, Rey-Benayas JM (2011) Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities. Trends Ecol Evol 26:541–549. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.011
Burke RA (2002) Ecological indicators for the nation. J Environ Qual 31:1045. doi:10.2134/jeq2002.1045
Cardoch L, Day JW Jr, Ibàñez C (2002) Net primary productivity as an indicator of sustainability in the Ebro and Mississippi deltas. Ecol Appl 12:1044–1055. doi:10.2307/3061035
Cutter SL (2002) American hazardscapes: the regionalization of hazards and disasters. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, D.C
De Lange H, Sala S, Vighi M, Faber J (2010) Ecological vulnerability in risk assessment—a review and perspectives. Sci Total Environ 408:3871–3879. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.11.009
Fekete A, Damm M, Birkmann J (2010) Scales as a challenge for vulnerability assessment. Nat Hazards 55:729–747. doi:10.1007/s11069-009-9445-5
Feng X, Fu B, Yang X, Lü Y (2010) Remote sensing of ecosystem services: an opportunity for spatially explicit assessment. Chin Geogr Sci 20:522–535. doi:10.1007/s11769-010-0428-y
Gardner JH, Bell DT (2007) Bauxite mining restoration by Alcoa World Alumina Australia in Western Australia: social, political, historical, and environmental contexts. Restor Ecol 15:S3–S10. doi:10.1111/j.1526-100x.2007.00287.x
Goklany IM (2007) Integrated strategies to reduce vulnerability and advance adaptation, mitigation, and sustainable development. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 12:755–786. doi:10.1007/s11027-007-9098-1
Gorokhovich Y, Voros A, Reid M, Mignone E (2003) Prioritizing abandoned coal mine reclamation projects within the contiguous United States using geographic information system extrapolation. Environ Manag 32:527–534. doi:10.1007/s00267-003-3043-1
Haberl H (1997) Human appropriation of net primary production as an environmental indicator: implications for sustainable development. Ambio 26:143–146
Han FB, Chen ZL (2014) Assessment on ecological environment vulnerability of large coal mine: an example from Kailuan mining area, China. In: Ren P, Du Z (eds) Manufacture Engineering and Environment Engineering, Vols 1 and 2, vol 84. WIT Transactions on Engineering Sciences. Wit Press, Southampton, pp 1461–1466. doi:10.2495/meee20132042
Hobbs RJ, Norton DA (1996) Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restor Ecol 4:93–110. doi:10.1111/j.1526-100x.1996.tb00112.x
Kimball S et al (2015) Cost-effective ecological restoration. Restor Ecol 23:800–810. doi:10.1111/rec.12261
King EG, Hobbs RJ (2006) Identifying linkages among conceptual models of ecosystem degradation and restoration: towards an integrative framework. Restor Ecol 14:369–378. doi:10.1111/j.1526-100x.2006.00145.x
Lange HJD, Lahr J, Van der Pol JJ, Wessels Y, Faber JH (2009) Ecological vulnerability in wildlife: an expert judgment and multicriteria analysis tool using ecological traits to assess relative impact of pollutants. Environ Toxicol Chem 28:2233–2240. doi:10.1897/08-626.1
Lei Y, Yue Y, Zhou H, Yin W (2014) Rethinking the relationships of vulnerability, resilience, and adaptation from a disaster risk perspective. Nat Hazards 70:609–627. doi:10.1007/s11069-013-0831-7
Liao XQ, Li W, Hou JX (2013) Application of GIS based ecological vulnerability evaluation in environmental impact assessment of master plan of coal mining area. In: Quan X (ed) 2013 international symposium on environmental science and technology, vol 18. Procedia environmental sciences. Elsevier Science Bv, Amsterdam, pp 271–276. doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2013.04.035
Lindenmayer DB, Margules CR, Botkin DB (2000) Indicators of biodiversity for ecologically sustainable forest management. Conserv Biol 14:941–950. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98533.x
Marschalko M, Yilmaz I, Kubečka K, Bouchal T, Bednarik M, Peňáz T (2014) Utilization of an underground mining evaluation map incorporating the effect of landslides and surface flooding for land-use purpose. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73:1117–1126. doi:10.1007/s10064-014-0634-4
Mukhopadhyay S, Maiti S, Masto R (2014) Development of mine soil quality index (MSQI) for evaluation of reclamation success: a chronosequence study. Ecol Eng 71:10–20. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.07.001
Niyogi DK, Lewis WM Jr, McKnight DM (2002) Effects of stress from mine drainage on diversity, biomass, and function of primary producers in mountain streams. Ecosystems 5:554–567. doi:10.1007/s10021-002-0182-9
Palliyaguru R, Amaratunga D, Baldry D (2014) Constructing a holistic approach to disaster risk reduction: the significance of focusing on vulnerability reduction. Disasters 38:45–61. doi:10.1111/disa.12031
Prakash A, Fielding E, Gens R, Van Genderen J, Evans D (2001) Data fusion for investigating land subsidence and coal fire hazards in a coal mining area. Int J Remote Sens 22:921–932. doi:10.1080/014311601300074441
Renaud FG, Birkmann J, Damm M, Gallopín GC (2010) Understanding multiple thresholds of coupled social–ecological systems exposed to natural hazards as external shocks. Nat Hazards 55:749–763. doi:10.1007/s11069-010-9505-x
Ruiz-Jaen MC, Mitchell Aide T (2005) Restoration success: how is it being measured? Restor Ecol 13:569–577. doi:10.1111/j.1526-100x.2005.00072.x
Samhouri JF, Levin PS, Ainsworth CH (2010) Identifying thresholds for ecosystem-based management. PLoS ONE 5:e8907. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008907
Seidl R, Rammer W, Lexer MJ (2011) Adaptation options to reduce climate change vulnerability of sustainable forest management in the Austrian Alps. Can J For Res 41:694–706. doi:10.1139/x10-235
Sklenička P, Lhota T (2002) Landscape heterogeneity—a quantitative criterion for landscape reconstruction. Landsc Urban Plan 58:147–156. doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(01)00217-1
Smith AM et al (2014) Remote sensing the vulnerability of vegetation in natural terrestrial ecosystems. Remote Sens Environ 154:322–337. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2014.03.038
Song G, Li Z, Yang Y, Semakula HM, Zhang S (2015) Assessment of ecological vulnerability and decision-making application for prioritizing roadside ecological restoration: a method combining geographic information system, Delphi survey and Monte Carlo simulation. Ecol Indic 52:57–65. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.11.032
Thornton PK, Ericksen PJ, Herrero M, Challinor AJ (2014) Climate variability and vulnerability to climate change: a review. Glob Change Biol 20:3313–3328. doi:10.1007/1-4020-4166-7_1
Thywissen K (2006) Components of risk: a comparative glossary. UNU-EHS
Tiwari AK, Singh PK, De Maio M (2016) Evaluation of aquifer vulnerability in a coal mining of India by using GIS-based DRASTIC model. Arab J Geosci 9:1–15. doi:10.1007/s12517-016-2456-0
Tongway DJ, Ludwig JA (2011) Restoring disturbed landscapes: putting principles into practice. Island Press, Washington, Covelo, London, UK
Turner BL et al (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8074–8079. doi:10.1073/pnas.1231335100
Villa F, McLEOD H (2002) Environmental vulnerability indicators for environmental planning and decision-making: guidelines and applications. Environ Manag 29:335–348. doi:10.1007/s00267-001-0030-2
Wasylycia-Leis J, Fitzpatrick P, Fonseca A (2014) Mining communities from a resilience perspective: managing disturbance and vulnerability in Itabira, Brazil. Environ Manag 53:481–495. doi:10.1007/s00267-014-0230-1
Whisenant S (1999) Repairing damaged wildlands: a process-orientated, landscape-scale approach, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Williams LR, Kapustka LA (2000) Ecosystem vulnerability: a complex interface with technical components. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:1055–1058. doi:10.1002/etc.5620190435
Wilson K, Pressey RL, Newton A, Burgman M, Possingham H, Weston C (2005) Measuring and incorporating vulnerability into conservation planning. Environ Manag 35:527–543. doi:10.1007/s00267-004-0095-9
Xu F, Tao S, Dawson RW, Li P, Cao J (2001) Lake ecosystem health assessment: indicators and methods. Water Res 35:3157–3167. doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(01)00040-9
Yan H, Zhan J, Liu B, Huang W, Li Z (2014) Spatially explicit assessment of ecosystem resilience: an approach to adapt to climate changes. Adv Meteorol. doi:10.1155/2014/798428
Yu D, Shi P, Shao H, Zhu W, Pan Y (2009) Modelling net primary productivity of terrestrial ecosystems in East Asia based on an improved CASA ecosystem model. Int J Remote Sens 30:4851–4866. doi:10.1080/01431160802680552
Zhang J, Fu M, Hassani FP, Zeng H, Geng Y, Bai Z (2011) Land use-based landscape planning and restoration in mine closure areas. Environ Manage 47:739–750. doi:10.1007/s00267-011-9638-z
Acknowledgements
The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51474214, U1361214), the Research Innovation Program for College Graduates of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. KYZZ-0386) and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions supported this work financially. The authors thank Anping Huang, Shaojin Hao and Liming Zhang for their participation in the fieldwork.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, Y., Ren, X., Zhang, S. et al. Incorporating ecological vulnerability assessment into rehabilitation planning for a post-mining area. Environ Earth Sci 76, 245 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6568-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6568-y