Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Karst groundwater source protection based on the time-dependent vulnerability assessment model: Crnica springs case study, Eastern Serbia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The implementation of sanitary protection zones is one of the most widely used approaches for preventive groundwater protection. Current regulations are usually based on the determination of the horizontal groundwater travel time component, while the vertical component is commonly neglected. Karst aquifers are especially sensitive to contamination through the unsaturated zone, and consequently numerous methods for determining intrinsic vulnerability have been developed. Many of these methods take into account the effects in the unsaturated zone, but mostly by indirect means. Vulnerability assessment methods do not fully reflect the component of groundwater residence time, making groundwater delineation zoning more difficult, with possible ambiguous and subjective results. Therefore, a method that incorporates the two equally important components (horizontal and vertical) is needed to facilitate groundwater protection zoning. The time-dependent model represents a redesigned vulnerability assessment method, created for karst aquifers, to incorporate the travel time component. This model incudes horizontal and vertical groundwater flow components and also considers a surface component toward ponor zones. The baseline for groundwater travel time through the unsaturated zone was adopted from the Time–input method. The estimation of the horizontal travel time component was based on the conceptual duality of flow in karst aquifers, which has fast and slow components. For the allogenic part of the karst aquifer catchment area (subcatchments of the ponor zone) travel time components were estimated according to different influencing factors e.g. slope, soil type, vegetation, and rainfall intensity. This methodology was tested on the case example of the Crnica karst source located at the western part of the Kučaj anticline in Eastern Serbia. The methodology was shown to be more accurate and appropriate for the delineation of the groundwater protection zones than existing approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreo B, Ravbar N, Vías JM (2008) Source vulnerability mapping in carbonate (karst) aquifers by extension of the COP method: application to pilot sites. Hydrogeol J 17(3):749–758. doi:10.1007/s10040-008-0391-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson TC (1977) Diffuse flow and conduit flow in limestone terrain in the Mendip Hills. Somerset (Great Britain). J Hydrol 35:93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakalowicz M (2005) Karst groundwater: a challenge for new resources. Hydrogeol J 13(1):148–160. doi:10.1007/s10040-008-0283-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benischke R, Goldscheider N, Smart C (2007) Tracer techniques. In: Goldscheider N, Drew D (eds) Methods in karst hydrogeology, international contribution to hydrogeology, IAH, vol 26. Taylor & Francis/Balkema, London, pp 147–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonacci O (1993) Karst springs hydrographs as indicators of karst aquifers. J Hydrol 38:51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chave P, Howard G, Schijven J, Appleyard S, Fladerer F, Schimon W (2006) Groundwater protection zones. In: Schmoll O, Howard G, Chilton J, Chorus I (eds) Protecting groundwater for health, managing the quality of drinking-water sources. IWA Publishing, London, pp 465–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Civita M (2008) An improved method for delineating source protection zones for karst springs based on analysis of recession curve data. Hydrogeol J 16:855–869. doi:10.1007/s10040-008-0283-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ConnDot (2000) Connecticut Department of Transportation Drainage manual. ConnDot, Newington

    Google Scholar 

  • Conservation Engineering Division (1986) Urban hydrology for small watersheds, National Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Dep. Agric., Tech. Rel. No. 55

  • Cvijić J (1893) Geographical Studies in the Area of Kučaj in Eastern Serbia. Geološki anali Balkanskog poluostrva Annales géologiques de la Peninsule balkanique 5(1):7–172 (in Serbian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Doerfliger N, Zwahlen F (1997) EPIK: a new method for outlining of protection areas in karstic environment. In: Günay G, Jonshon AI (eds) International symposium and field seminar on “Karst waters and environmental impacts”. Antalya, Turkey. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 117–123

  • Engman ET (1986) Roughness coefficients for routing surface runoff. J Irrig Drain Eng-Asce 112(1):39–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2014) ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.2. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute

  • European Commission (2007) Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance Document No. 16. Guidance on Groundwater in Drinking Water Protected Areas. European Community, Luxembourg

  • Ford DC, Williams P (2007) Karst hydrogeology and geomorphology. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foster S, Hirata R, Gomes D, D’Elia M, Paris M (2002) Groundwater quality protection. A guide for water utilities, municipal authorities, and environment agencies. The World Bank, Washington

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldscheider N, Klute M, Sturm S, Hötzl H (2000) The PI method—a GIS-based approach to mapping groundwater vulnerability with special consideration of karst aquifers. Z Angew Geol 46(3):157–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölting B, Haertlé T, Hohberger KH, Nachtigall KH, Villinger E, Weinzierl W, Wrobel JP (1995) Konzept zur Ermittlung der Schutzfunktion der Grundwasserüber-deckung. Geol Jahrb C63:5–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Jemcov I, Petric M (2009) Measured precipitation versus effective infiltration and their influence on the assessment of karst systems based on results of the time series analysis. J Hydrol 379:304–314. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jemcov I, Pavlović R, Stevanović Z (2002) Morphotectonic analysis in hydrogeological research of karst terrains—A case-study of SW Kucaj Massif, Eastern Serbia. Theor Appl Karstol 15:51–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavouri K, Plagnes V, Tremoulet J, Dörfliger N, Reijiba F, Marchet P (2011) PaPRIKA: a method for estimating karst resource and source vulnerability—application to the Ouysse karst system (southwest France). Hydrogeol J 19(2):339–353. doi:10.1007/s10040-010-0688-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kralik M, Keimel T (2003) Time-input, an innovative groundwater-vulnerability assessment scheme: application to an alpine test site. Environ Geol 44(6):679–686. doi:10.1007/s00254-003-0809-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larocque M, Mangin A, Razack M, Banton O (1998) Contribution of correlation and spectral analyses to the regional study of a large karst aquifer (Charente, France). J Hydrol 205:217–231. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00155-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangin A (1994) Karst hydrogeology. In: Gilbert J, Danielopol DL, Stanford JA (eds) Groundwater ecology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 43–67

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marsaud B (1996) Structure et fonctionnment de la zone noyée des karst à partir des résultats expérimentaux. Dissertation, Université Paris XI

  • Milanović P (2000) Geological engineering in karst, Dams, reservoirs, grouting, groundwater protection, water tapping, tunneling. Zebra Publishing Ltd, Belgrade

    Google Scholar 

  • Mladenović A, Trivić B, Antić M, Cvetković V, Pavlović R, Radovanović S, Fügenschuh B (2014) The recent fault kinematics in the westernmost part of the Getic nappe system (Eastern Serbia): evidence from fault slip and focal mechanism data. Geol Carpath 65(2):147–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Oehlmann S, Geyer T, Licha T, Sauter M (2015) Reducing the ambiguity of karst aquifer models by pattern matching of flow and transport on catchment scale. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 19:3–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla A, Pulido-Bosch A (1995) Study hydrographs of karstic aquifers by means of correlation and cross-spectral analysis. J Hydrol 168:73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paloc H (1985) Problemes de protection de la qualite des eaux souterraines en terrains calcaires. In: Matthess G, Foster SSD, Skinner AC (eds) Theoretical background, hydrogeology and practice of groundwater protection zones. International contributions to hydrogeology, IAH, vol 6. Verlag Heinz Heise, Hannover, pp 145–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Pochon A, Tripet JP, Kozel R, Meylan B, Sinreich M, Zwahlen F (2008) Groundwater protection in fractured media: a vulnerability-based approach for delineating protection zones in Switzerland. Hydrogeol J 16:1267–1281. doi:10.1007/s10040-008-0323-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pronk M, Goldscheider N, Zopfi J, Zwahlen F (2009) Percolation and particle transport in the unsaturated zone of a karst aquifer. Groundwater 47(3):361–369. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2008.00509.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravbar N, Goldscheider N (2007) Proposed methodology of vulnerability and contamination risk mapping for the protection of karst aquifers in Slovenia. Acta Carsologica 36(3):397–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaap MG, Liej FJ, van Genuchten M (1999) A bootstrap-neural network approach to predict soil hydraulic parameters. In: van Genuchten M, Liej FJ, Wu L (eds) Characterization and measurements of the hydraulic properties of unsaturated porous media. University of California at Riverside, Riverside, pp 1237–1250

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevanović Z (1991) Hydrogeology of Carpathian-Balkan karst of eastern Serbia and water supply. Faculty of Mining and Geology, Belgrade

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevanović Z, Dragišić V (1992) Directions of circulation of karst ground waters in the Carpatho-Balkanides, Serbia. In: Hötzl H, Werne A (eds) Tracer Hydrology. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 291–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Teutsch G, Sauter M (1991) Groundwater modelling in karst terrains: Scale effects, data acquisition and field validation. In: Quinlan J (ed) Proceedings of the third conference on hydrogeology, ecology, monitoring, and management of groundwater in karst. Nashville, pp 17–34

  • Vakanjac VR, Prohaska P, Polomčić D, Blagojević B, Vakanjac B (2013) Karst aquifer average catchment area assessment through monthly water balance equation with limited meteorological data set: application to Grza spring in Eastern Serbia. Acta Carsologica 42(1):109–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Stempvoort D, Ewert L, Wassenaar L (1992) Aquifer vulnerability index: a GIS-compatible method for groundwater vulnerability mapping. Can Water Resour J 18:25–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Waegeningh HG (1985) Overview of protection of groundwater quality. In: Matthess G, Foster SSD, Skinner AC (eds) Theoretical background, hydrogeology and practice of groundwater protection zones. International contributions to hydrogeology, IAH, vol 6. Verlag Heinz Heise, Hannover, pp 159–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington SRH (2007) Groundwater residence times in unconfined carbonate aquifers. J Cave Karst Stud 69(1):94–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Živanović V (2015) Delineation of karst groundwater protection zones. In: Stevanovic Z (ed) Karst aquifers—characterization and engineering, professional practice in earth sciences. Springer, Switzerland. ISBN 978-3-319-12850-4. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12850-4_17

  • Zwahlen F (ed) (2004) Vulnerability and risk mapping for the protection of carbonate (karstic) aquifers. Final report COST action 620. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research, Brüssel, Luxemburg

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development (as a part of the Projects Nos. 43004 and 176022).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Mining and Geology, Department of Hydrogeology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

    Vladimir Živanović, Igor Jemcov, Veselin Dragišić, Nebojša Atanacković & Sava Magazinović

Authors
  1. Vladimir Živanović
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Igor Jemcov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Veselin Dragišić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nebojša Atanacković
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sava Magazinović
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Igor Jemcov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Živanović, V., Jemcov, I., Dragišić, V. et al. Karst groundwater source protection based on the time-dependent vulnerability assessment model: Crnica springs case study, Eastern Serbia. Environ Earth Sci 75, 1224 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-6018-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-6018-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation