Introduction

Deterioration processes, which have to go on for many years before showing apparent damage, are to be monitored over relatively short time intervals or when such processes are simulated in the laboratory. Thus, it is critical to ascertain the parameters that control deterioration and the operative decay processes, with an ultimate goal of mitigating potential deterioration, especially in wet environment (Cardell et al. 2008). Stone decay takes many different forms, sometimes the stone weathers away gradually; other times large scales of stone drop away in one go. The surface may erupt into blisters or the stone may lose all integrity. Many factors contribute to the decay of the stone, which can be regarded as the sum of processes that affect rocks and give rise to new products and structures that are more stable under the surface environments. All these processes are controlled by three main factors: rock (chemical composition and physical properties) (Montoto 2000), nature of the solutions present (e.g. ions/molecules, concentrations, ionic force, acidity, etc.) (El-Gohary 2011), and environment (e.g. temperature, organic matter, drainage, etc.) (Molina Ballesteros et al. 2010). Rising damp is a widespread phenomenon and a major cause of decay to masonry materials especially when coupled with high salt concentrations. It can cause several deterioration forms even when it is mild. Saline groundwater is considered the most important factor that may affect the extent of damage to different materials and lead to several deterioration forms according to its quality “chemical composition”. Groundwater quality largely depends on the mineralogical composition, physical properties of rocks, anthropogenic activities, and biogeochemical processes, in addition to mineral weathering through rock–water interaction and percolated water (Kim 2002). It also depends on the duration of contact with the aquifer chemical constituents and the nature of recharge water. These processes generally dominate the concentration of the major cations (Ca, Mg, Na and K) in groundwater (Kim et al. 2005).

In Egypt, groundwater is considered the major factor contributing to the deterioration of the Pharaonic monuments through salt weathering (El-Gohary 2012). This phenomenon is one of the most serious problems resulting from rising damp; it is widely recognized as one of the primary deterioration agents of archaeological buildings, objects and all historical structures. Salt weathering is a threshold phenomenon that leads to one outcome type before the effect (alternative hydration and crystallization cycles) and another type after it (full disintegration mechanisms and forms), furthermore, the behaviour of salt within the stone buildings is not straightforward (Turkington and Smith 2000). Within the same context, there are wide range of analytical techniques which may be used for explaining materials deterioration depending on the type of information needed. Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) technique has been applied to analyze the sample’s chemistry because it has a number of features which make it particularly appropriate to such analysis (Hughes et al. 1976). Furthermore, it can determine a wide range of elements, concentrations in parts per million provided by quite accurate results even with quite small samples compared to other techniques (Beaty and Kerber 1993). Scanning Electron Microscopy coupled with Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) is a powerful tool used to investigate the material surfaces, and gives useful information about the specimen micro-structure (Cardell et al. 2002), with high resolution. It has good focus over a wide range of specimen surfaces and can provide high-quality imaging facilities (Freestone and Middleton 1987). Moreover, X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) is an important technique for characterizing the crystal composition; it is used to identify and quantify the soluble salts present in soluble salt solution sample such as sodium sulfate phase (Linnow 2007). The main objective of this study is to find out different causes of deterioration factors and their mechanisms affecting the building masonry in Horus temple through different effects of ground water. These effects produce many micro-deterioration forms and structural problems. Therefore, all the obtained data about moisture, salt load, hygroscopic effects, stone properties and their changes in deteriorated zones, have to be put together and discussed and finally, to obtain the scientific basis for decisions about appropriate restoration measurements.

Brief historical overview of Horus temple

The Temple of Horus (Fig. 1a) was dedicated to the falcon headed God Horus (Fig. 1b) (Baines and Malek 2000). It was built during the reign of six ptolemies. The construction of this temple was begun in 237 BC. By Ptolemy III (Evergetes I) and was finished in 57 BC by Ptolemy XII (Auletes). Work on the temple continued throughout this period with a brief interruption of 20 years because of the riot during the period of Ptolemy IV (Philopator) and Ptolemy V (Epiphanies). The temple is not only the best preserved ancient temple in Egypt, but it is also the second largest after Karnak Temple. It was believed that the temple was built on the site of the great battle between the two famous gods in this area, Horus and Set. Hence, the current temple was the last one in a long series of temples built in this location; the pylons of the main temple are about 118 feet high, with typical scenes of the pharaoh in the battle with his enemies. Within the pylons is the colonnaded courtyard, with distinctive pared columns, which leads to the great hypostyle hall. On the other side of the courtyard, there are gates, which lead to an area behind the temple and inside the building walls.

Fig. 1
figure 1

a The temple of Horus in Edfu, b the falcon headed god Horus

Geographic location, topographic features and geological framework

Edfu town, Fig. 2a is 120 km from Aswan governorate and is located on its northern part. The temple area is located on the western part of Edfu town, on the border between the cultivated land and the old town. Practical fieldworks, measurements and cadastral maps proved that the temple is surrounded, from the eastern, northern and southern parts by recent buildings which rise about 5.8 m. from the land of the temple. The temple (Fig. 2b) was built on a hill of silt and clay belonging to the Cretaceous period. From the western part, the temple borders are cultivated whose level parallels the level of the temple. According to Senosy et al. (1998), the study area is located on the alluvial plains of the Nile Valley, which are surrounded by structural plateaus capped by Eocene limestone and underlain by Paleocene shale. These plains slope gently to the north and east and they could be differentiated into other older plain structures. Through the main geological studies about this region, four major stratigraphic formations have been recognized. They are: Edfu formation, Esna shale, Armant formation and finally Issawia formation. The structural units to which the area understudy belongs is the stable shelf which covers the Northern part of Egypt, which is considered a part of a large belt surrounded by ill-defined boundaries from the Arabo-Nubian massif.

Fig. 2
figure 2

a Geographic location and topographic features of Edfu temple, b schematic map of Edfu temple and surrounded area

Stratigraphic scheme and hydrogeological system

Through field study and analyzing the stratigraphic obtained data, it could be noted that the temple rises on the south part of the Nile valley coming from Aswan to Qena, 1200 m far from the Nile. So, it is localized inside the Stable Shelf structural unit. Inside this geological unit, the Nubia sandstone and shales are capped by shelly limestone and bone beds of Campaniano to the Mastrichtian age. The river, eastward through this district, cuts its valley through the softer shales leaving spurs of the harder beds abutting on the cultivated land. The hill at Atawani is typical of those spurs. A typical stratigraphic section, which can be found in this part of the Nile valley, could be described from the top to the bottom in Table 1.

Table 1 a typical stratigraphic section in the Nile valley between Aswan to Qena

Hydrogeologically, Egypt is located within the arid zone of North Africa, where there are two main fresh water systems: the first is mainly extracted from the River Nile system and the second is the groundwater (Farrag 2005). The groundwater flows and its quality properties may have led to many problems in the temple of Horus as previously studied in technical reports by Groundwater Institute (2012). The study proved that the groundwater system in the area is highly influenced by the Nile flow and its interaction with the soil which depends on the hydraulic conductivity and the outcropping present. Thus, when the stable shelf is made by lithified rock material masses like sandstone and limestone, there would be higher hydraulic conductivity due to the presence of fracture. From the geotechnical point of view, when the soil is composed of clayey shales outcrop, the hydraulic conductivity and the interaction between the Nile and groundwater flow in the temple area would be lower. In the study area, groundwater quality is strongly influenced by the minerals of the dominating stones aquifer through recharging of flowed water (Table 2). These quality features characterized by high salinity index led to different deterioration forms. In fact, there are three major sources of water that influenced the area understudy. They are irrigation draining water coming from agricultural activities (from West to East), Domestic wastewater draining coming from surrounding civil buildings (from East, North and South), Nile River draining which is sub-parallel with temple direction (Fig. 3a, b).

Table 2 Chemical analysis of groundwater inside the temple and in surrounded area (mg/l)
Fig. 3
figure 3

a Hydraulic section in Edfu temple, b Litholographic section in and around Edfu temple

Deterioration symptoms dominating in the temple

The negative roles of groundwater affecting Horus Temple could be summarized in two main mechanisms. The first mechanism, related to micro-deterioration symptoms through fracturing, complete disintegration and surface degradation. This mechanism led to wetting most of the temple surfaces especially in winter, forming different salt species which are one of the primary agents in the loss of the built culture heritage and lead to many forms especially in scaling and flaking forms (McCabe et al. 2011; Fig. 4a, b). The second mechanism is attributed to structural problems that led to some aggressive symptoms such as effective cracks and falling down of some stone fragments from the upper lintels of the temple (mostly resulted through indirect effects), in addition to splinters (Fig. 4c). These problems mostly resulted by water movements under the temple foundation (Cardell et al. 2008), rising damp effects occurred when groundwater flowed into the temple structure base through the pore structure (Rirsch and Zhang 2010); in addition, effect of water suction pressure migrating from the building foundations (estimated by ~4–5 m from ground surface) through capillary rising (defined by 12.30 %), water evaporation rate on its wall surface according to the dominating air temperature and relative humidity, finally, effects of seasonal swelling and shrinking of the clay portion of the soil as argued previously by El-Shishtawy et al. (2013).

Fig. 4
figure 4

a Wetting most of the temple surfaces especially in winter in addition to the forming different salt species, b multi-system of fracturing especially in scaling and flaking forms, c some mechanical problems in falling down of some stone fragments from the upper lintels of the temple and effective cracks, in addition to splinters

Sample criteria, analytical methods

Analytical techniques are mammoth task to better understand cultural heritage artifacts and to improve understanding of their manufacture, their evolution and/or degradation features during time (Boutaine 2006). So the use of many analytical techniques is necessary especially if definitive results of the components of cultural heritage are required. From this point of view, a considerable number of these techniques were used to evaluate chemical alterations and different weathering products of the uppermost surface layer or even of microscopic spots in bedrock structure. In addition, other techniques based on differences in physical and chemical properties of water were used for studying natural water composition. From specialized point of view, two types of samples were collected from different locations of the site. The first type represents the groundwater samples which were collected from the well inside the temple, in addition to other four wells outside the temple. These samples were treated and submitted to AAS investigations and chemical titrations according to Hughes et al. (1976) to define the their qualitative and quantitative properties. Furthermore, some water samples were evaporate and fully dried, then analyzed by XRD according to Soukup et al. (2008) to define the relation between the dominated minerals both in the water and the weathering products. In addition, pH, alkalinity (total mg/l CaCO3), Hardness, TDS g/l and EC of the same samples were identified to evaluate the water quality in the study area. The second type of the samples contains micro-samples related to weathering products collected from different directions and heights of the building. They were chosen to reflect the typical weathering features according to their places and they were divided into two categories (light affected areas) (heavy affected areas). According to NORMA (2006) and El-Gohary and Al-Shorman (2010), these samples were studied and analyzed using energy dispersive X-Ray (SEM-EDX) to draw a map of the main types of micro-deterioration morphologies. Moreover, the same samples were quantitatively and qualitatively detected by EDX to define their elemental ratios and kinds, as well as obtaining the relations between the range of stone affections (RSA) and the amount of water present (AWP). Furthermore, evaporated groundwater residues were prepared and then analyzed by XRD technique according to Fitzpatrick et al. (2005) for characterizing their mineralogical features using Shimadzu Lab X, XRD 6000 X-Ray Diffractometer.

Results

Water chemical analysis by AAS

The analytical results of ground-water samples proved that the chemical constituents are notably varied. These variations are mainly due to the multi-synergetic effects resulting from the combination of dominating salts in the study area. The results of chemical analysis and major properties of samples are listed in Table 3. Moreover, identifying the origin of water (hypothetical salts combination) affirmed that our samples essentially belong to the meteoric water due to the occurrence of carbonates and bicarbonates as major anions. Within the same context, the influence of other minor anions is due to chlorides and sulphates resulted from the human activities (domestic waste water), in addition to phosphate as trace constituents resulting from the effects of cultivation activities. These results are summarized in Table 4.

Table 3 Chemical analysis and major properties of groundwater samples of Horus temple
Table 4 Hypothetical salts combination of groundwater samples (water origin) of Horus temple

Morphological description of weathering features

The morphological features of investigated samples captured by SEM affirmed that the stone was highly influenced by severe groundwater effects and its serious chemical components. Different photomicrographs deal with the presence of weakness and collapsing features, some salt species such as sodium sulphate in its complex shape. Moreover, fracture and disintegration form in addition other noticeable symptoms such as disfiguring apparent, cracks, crevices and grains roundness and dissolution phenomena. All of these results are shown in Fig. 5a–f.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Photomicrographs show, a weakness and collapsing of quartez grains as a result of drying wetting cycles, X-150, b fracture and disintigration phenomena affacting qz grains and presence of sylvite salt KCl, X-200, c sample of sodium sulphste in its complex shape and disfiguring apparent affecting stone surfaces, X-750, d cracks and crevices resulting from stress and strains inside the stone and spherical gypsum crystals a result of interaction with salinity water and wetting drying cycles, X-750, e weakness and roundness of qz grains as a result weathering processes, dissolution phenomena and presence of NaCl and developed black crusts, X-150, and f fracture and dissolution affecting qz grains as a result of interaction with salinity water, X-500

Chemical composition of weathering products

The quantitative and qualitative results made by EDX micro-analysis deal with the samples that were highly affected by different dominating types of salts and other environmental factors. These influences have led to the decreasing of the main components of sandstone 95.11–44.08 % and vice versa increasing the quantities of weathering products from 4.89 to 55.92 %. Both the elemental components average of light affected stone (3 samples) and the average of highly affected stone (3 samples) are presented in Table 5.

Table 5 Quantitative and qualitative analysis of weathering products by EDX

Mineralogical analysis of evaporated residues by XRD

The results of evaporated groundwater residues collected from the study area by XRD attested that the main components of these samples composed essentially of Halite (NaCl), Sylvite (KCl) and Thenardite (Na2SO4) as major salt species in addition to Niter (KNO3) and Natron (Na2CO3) as minor salt species (Table 6).

Table 6 Main components of evaporated groundwater residues by XRD

Discussion

The durability of building materials is an issue with large implications. The most important factor governing this durability is most likely weathering which involves various processes. Subsurface water is often a critical factor in various engineering work, as well as the archaeological buildings; it has shortened the design life of stone structures and contributed to the failure of building settlement and foundations movements (Douglas and Noy 2011). It is well known that groundwater has great effects on rocks strength, where it leads to the growth of salt crystals within pores and can cause internal stresses. Also, it leads to the enhancement of the stone structure collapsing and reducing its strength through several chemical mechanisms such as adsorption–desorption and ion exchange as previously reported by Romijn (2002). For instance, these effects mostly depend on stone physical and mechanical properties particularly, porosity and permeability. Furthermore, they are related to total dissolved solids (TDS) and different dominating chemical constituents (calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, chloride and sulphate), in addition to total hardness (TH) and hydrogen ion concentration (pH). From a specialized point of view, the groundwater in the study area and its chemical constituents led to the creation of deterioration multi-systems that vary between structural defects and micro-weathering scale. These effects that lead finally to an illness—most commonly a cancer—undermining the health of the building and eventually leading to its demise as mentioned previously by Malaga-Starzee et al. (2000) in similar case. Within the same context, the static groundwater level inside the temple mostly ranged between 3.16 and 3.50 m from the temple surface. It is mostly influenced by different chemical components coming out from the soil essentially affected by three kinds of drainages that are characterized by having different origins.

The first is irrigation drainage water: this water leaks into the temple from the western side (Fig. 2a). It can play a partial harmful role in the degradation processes of not only sandstones, but also the soil under the temple through chemical constituents that contains (phosphates). This type of salt comes from the fertilizer that is mostly used in the surrounding cultivated lands or from the human bones buried near the neighborhood of the temple that contribute to the contamination process. The second is domestic waste water: this type plays an aggressive role in the deterioration processes of the temple; it comes from the civil buildings and houses which encompass the temple from all directions (Fig. 2b). These houses are built on a layer of silt and clay distinguished by a low degree of permeability that is able to keep this water and its chemical constituents such as (sulphate and carbonate salts). These salts have a high ability to make physical and chemical disintegration of stone leading to the absorbing of this water towards the stone causing full deterioration of stones (El-Gohary 2011). The Nile water is the third source of water affecting the temple deterioration, where the temple is about 1100 m far from the Nile. The field study proved that there is a big chance for water table to rise under the temple especially in the winter, which leads to an increase of the disintegration and decay processes of stones especially with the presence of wastes produced from the paper pulp factory (Awadalla et al. 1995). The chemical constituent of these wastes mostly contains all types of anions that owe to the human different activities (carbonate and bi-carbonate in addition to some trace anions sulphates and chlorides). All the previous sources created through several main deterioration effects which vary from micro-effects of structural defects that are known as main deterioration phenomena caused by groundwater affected Horus temple.

Micro-deterioration forms recorded at the temple might be created through the interaction between different ground water effects (physical and chemical) and other deterioration mechanisms caused by other ambient factors. Physical mechanism appears as a wetting of stone surfaces that mostly occurs with water presence in any of its various forms, which causes and accelerates the decay of most building materials. In our case study, this mechanism resulted through the effects of ground water and led to the presence of stone wetting through water penetration within the stone pores. This complex process finally leads to salt crystallization and consequent physical pressures (Fassina et al. 2012). Chemical mechanism tends to establish equilibrium between temple rocks and dominating environmental factors through weathering process. This type of weathering is mostly enhanced by the movement of groundwater through the networks of discontinuities present in rock masses. In addition, it could be claimed that most of ground waters may be quite polluted by high levels of salt anions such as HCO3 , CO3 , NO3 , Cl, and SO4 (Appleo and Postma 2005). In our case these anions resulted from rich chemical compounds that reach the floor and stones under the temple crossing the clay shale layer as represented in Fig. 2c. Within the same context, chemical analyses presented in Table 2 show that there is richness of mineral compounds as their TDS which is quite high (in fact in some sample it is more than 1000 mg/l) (Fig. 6). This aggressive percentage creates harsh deterioration mechanisms, these mechanisms and their related forms may be due to two main factors.

Fig. 6
figure 6

TDS relations between result of groundwater analysis of Edfu temple well and the wells in surrounded area

The first factor is related to the very low value of pluviometric precipitation in the study area, which in fact means rising in groundwater levels about few millimeters a year. The second one is the richness in the chemical constituents, which is due to the quite long staying of groundwater in the soil as it has to flow across clay layers because of its low hydraulic conductivity. In its slow flowing in the ground, the chemical interaction with rock masses becomes very high, especially with the clay, which is easy to exchange its chemical constituents with groundwater. So, the temple groundwater is relatively rich in Na+, Mg2+ and Ca2+. In addition, the analysis of groundwater affirmed that it is very mixed with water coming from the human activities this maybe due to high level both of Cl content and the high presence in SO4 . Thus it could be said that the global effects of these processes are chemically aggressive and can favor the weathering of the temple rock minerals that can lead to many deterioration appearances. The presence of some salt species contributes to the process, such as calcium carbonate, which is a main component resulting from limestone structural geological bed. It does not have by itself a disintegrating effect once it has crystallized, but it forms incrustations that are very hard and intractable. Regarding sodium chloride, it is the most common salt in urban areas (Panno et al. 2006), produced by the solution of halite which leads through hydration and dehydration cycles to promote the deterioration of surfaces by its action on other salts that may be present under the effect of varying temperature (Wells et al. 2006).

Most of these salts are crystallized on building stone surfaces as efflorescence in fine white crystals that lead to severe deterioration forms as crusting, black hard crusts and discoloration. Furthermore, the field investigations indicate that the crystallization is also taking place below the surface (sub-efflorescence) (McCabe et al. 2008), which can cause many forms of damage such as stone fracturing, granular disintegration, sugaring and other harmful forms. These forms are mostly due to the intrinsic deterioration factors, particularly expansion–contraction joint. It means a break in a rock produced by mechanical failure and it mostly includes faults and joints (Chacon 1999). Moreover, other deterioration forms were mentioned with minor grade particularly scaling and flecking. According to El-Gohary and Al-Shorman (2010), scaling is a serious physical form, attributed to the sensitivity of stone materials for deterioration processes especially with the presence of some aggressive sources of salts such as halite and sulphate characterizing the ground water in this area. Flaking is a detachment of small, thin stone elements due to the presence of soluble salt and salt crystals that is often attributed to volume expansion accompanying hydration of the anhydrous salts (Pavlík et al. 2013).

Structural problems refer to mechanical damage results by the load or the stress affecting stone structure or those results by the poor design of the buildings (Steiger et al. 2011). Furthermore, the effects of differential soil settlement that cause some cracks in the structures, while catastrophic events such as earthquakes are responsible for heavy damages in buildings. Also, there are many types of structural damages that stones can undergo which may produce particular deterioration patterns that are then described by specific terms. In our case, many problems resulted from some structural defects affecting the temple. These defects are essentially due to the effects of geological and stratigraphical features, in addition to the effects of other underground environment and ground water movements. They are falling down from some stone fragments of the upper lintels of the temple. They are mostly due to the structural behavior of load bearing stone columns of the temple. Moreover, these effects may be due to the problems caused by clays shrinkable and contractible actions that lead to building cracking through charging and discharging the groundwater, particularly near building foundations resulting from water infiltration and re-crystallization phenomena (Mills 2004). Within the same context the effective cracks affected some arches in our case are mostly closely followed the lines of the junctions between the exterior buttresses and the infill panels as argued previously by Blades and Stewart (2004) in his case study. According to Weaver (1997), these cracks are serious forms affecting the archaeological buildings, their effects resulted essentially from corrosion process that caused the ferrous metal to laminate and split the surrounding stones because of the increasing moisture. Regarding splinters, as a structural deterioration form, it is a serious deterioration form resulting essentially from detachment of large compact stone elements (Croci 1998). This mechanism mostly occurs in the splinter shape in irregular fractures across the usual zones of weakness, bedding planes in few centimeters and joints. It means broken stone surfaces to many small fragments, which mostly occur as a direct result of the signature of the crystal wedging process (White and White 2003). Finally, the structural problems and all of accompanying changes mostly result from the increasing material susceptibility to deterioration processes. These changes like iron minerals oxidation, clays hydration and dehydration and quartz expansion or contraction, in addition to dimensional change resulting from thermal cycling.

Conclusion

The study assessed the evolution of the harmful effects of groundwater in Horus Temple area through estimating its quality, which plays an important role in the weathering processes affecting the temple area through two main mechanisms (micro-deterioration and structural defects). This research also has led to some core parameters and findings that explained the aggressive effects of groundwater on the decay of monumental buildings, in addition to other parameters influencing deterioration like pH, TDS, alkalinity, TH and EC. In collating the results obtained by AAS analysis and micro-morphological studies made by SEM analysis, we can indicate definitely that diverse deterioration processes operate synergistically on temple building materials leading to the mentioned weathering patterns (surfaces wetting, forming of salt species, presence of fracturing multi-system especially in scaling and flecking, falling down of some stone fragments, and effective cracks and splinters). A conservation policy for our case study exposed that this aggressive environment can be established by improving routine maintenance practices. It should include some scientific procedures that vary from interventive actions (salt extraction procedures followed by right consolidation and protection steps according to the material types) to preventive procedures (improving the quality and quantity of groundwater through good and accurate hydro-geochemical studies). Finally, for structural conservation, it aims at evaluating a suitable systematic approach for developing general criteria of compatibility in selecting the replacement materials for disintegrated and missing parts in the monuments that comprise more than one natural building stone material.