Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A threshold artificial neural network model for improving runoff prediction in a karst watershed

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Artificial neural network model (ANN) has been extensively used in hydrological prediction. Generally, most existing rainfall-runoff models including artificial neural network model are not very successful at simulating streamflow in karst watersheds. Due to the complex physical structure of karst aquifer systems, runoff generation processes are quite different during flood and non-flood periods. In this paper, an ANN model based on back-propagation algorithm was developed to simulate and predict daily streamflow in karst watersheds. The idea of threshold was introduced into artificial neural network model [hereafter called Threshold-ANN model (T-ANN)] to represent the nonlinear characteristics of the runoff generation processes in the flood and non-flood periods. The T-ANN model is applied to the Hamajing watershed, which is a small karst watershed in Hubei Province, China. The network input, the previous discharge, is determined by the correlative analysis, and the network structure is optimized with the maximum Nash coefficient as the objective function. And the precipitation and previous discharge are chosen as the threshold factors to reflect the effect of specificity of karst aquifer systems, respectively. By using the T-ANN, the simulation errors of streamflow have been reduced, and the simulation becomes more successful, which would be helpful for runoff prediction in karst watersheds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahart JR, See L (2000) Comparing neural network and autoregressive moving average techniques for the provision of continuous river flow forecasts in two contrasting catchments. Hydrol Process 14:2157–2172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Allen PM, Muttiah R, Bernhardt G (1995) Automated base flow separation and recession analysis techniques. Gr Water 33:1010–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE (2000a) Task committee on application of artificial neural networks in hydrology, artificial neural networks in hydrology part I: preliminary concepts. J Hydrol Eng 5:115–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE (2000b) Task committee on application of artificial neural networks in hydrology, artificial neural networks in hydrology part II: hydrologic applications. J Hydrol Eng 5:124–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett ME, Charbeneau RJ (1997) A parsimonious model for simulating flow in a karst aquifer. J Hydrol 196:47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonacci O (2001) Analysis of the maximum discharge of karst springs. Hydrogeol J 9:328–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bras R, Rodriguez-Iturbe I (1985) Random functions and hydrology. Addison Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell CW, Sullivan SM (2002) Simulating time-varying cave flow and water levels using the storm water management model. Eng Geol 65:133–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JF, Jin QJ, Chao J (2012) Design of deep belief networks for short-term prediction of drought index using data in the Huaihe river basin. Math Probl Eng 2012:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Cigizoglu HK (2004) Estimation and forecasting of daily suspended sediment data by multi-layer perceptrons. Adv Water Resour 27:185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cigizoglu HK, Kisi O (2005) Flow prediction by three backpropagation techniques using k-fold partitioning of neural network training data. Nord Hydrol 36:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Cybenko G (1989) Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function. Math Control Signals Syst 2:303–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson CW, Wilby RL (2001) Hydrological modeling using artificial neural networks. Prog Phys Geogr 25:80–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreiss SJ (1982) Linear kernels for karst aquifers. Water Resour Res 18:865–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreiss SJ (1983) Linear unit-response functions as indicators of recharge areas for large karst springs. J Hydrol 61:31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenlohr L, Kiral L, Bouzelboudjen M, Rossier Y (1997) Numerical simulation as a tool for checking the interpretation of karst spring hydrographs. J Hydrol 193:306–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan YH, Huo XL, Hao YH, Liu Y, Wang TK, Liu YC, Yeh TCJ (2013) An assembled extreme value statistical model of karst spring discharge. J Hydrol 504:57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feisi Research and Development Center of Science and Technology (2003) MATAB 6.5 auxiliary neural network analysis and design. Electronics Industry Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Felton GK, Currens JC (1994) Peak flow rate and recession-curve characteristics of a karst spring in the inner bluegrass, central Kentucky. J Hydrol 162:119–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furundzic D (1998) Application example of neural networks for time series analysis: rainfall runoff modeling. Sig Process 64:383–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge ZX, Sun ZQ (2007) Neural network theory and MATLAB R2007 realization. Electronic Industry Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Halihan T, Wicks CM (1998) Modeling of storm responses in conduit flow aquifers with reservoirs. J Hydrol 208:82–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H (1989) Multilayer feed forward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw 2:359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu HP, Tian FQ (2007) Advancement in research of physically based watershed hydrological model. J Hydraul Eng 38:511–517 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu TS, Lam KC, Ng ST (2001) River flow time series prediction with a range-dependent neural network. Hydrol Sci J 46:729–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu TS, Lam KC, Ng ST (2005) A modified neural network for improving river flow prediction. Hydrol Sci J 50(2):299–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu CH, Hao YH, Yeh TC, Pang B, Wu ZN (2008) Simulation of spring flows from a karst aquifer with an artificial neural network. Hydrol Process 22:596–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain A, Srinivasulu S (2004) Development of effective and efficient rainfall runoff models using integration of deterministic, real-coded GA, and ANN techniques. Water Resour Res 40:W043021–W0430212

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang LH, Wang AG, Tian NY, Zhang WC, Fan QL (2011) BP neural network of continuous casting technological parameters and secondary dendrite arm spacing of spring steel. J Iron Steel Res Int 18:25–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ju Q, Yu ZB, Hao ZC, Ou GX, Zhao J, Liu DD (2009) Division-based rainfall-runoff simulations with BP neural networks and Xinanjiang model. Neurocomputing 72:2873–2883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jukic D, Denic-Jukic V (2006) Nonlinear kernel functions for karst aquifers. J Hydrol 328:360–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labat D, Ababou R, Mangin A (2000a) Rainfall-runoff relations for karstic springs, part I: convolution and spectral analyses. J Hydrol 238:123–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labat D, Ababou R, Mangin A (2000b) Rainfall-runoff relations for karstic springs, part II: continuous wavelet and discrete orthogonal multiresolution analyses. J Hydrol 238:149–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labat D, Ababou R, Mangin A (2001) Introduction of wavelet analyses to rainfall/runoffs relationship for a karstic basin: the case of Licq–Atherey karstic system (France). Gr Water 39:605–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambrakis N, Andreou AS, Polydoropoulos P, Georgopoulos E, Bountis T (2000) Nonlinear analysis and forecasting of a brackish karstic spring. Water Resour Res 36:875–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu YB, Batelaan O, De Smedt F, Huong NT, Tam VT (2005) Test of a distributed modelling approach to predict flood flows in the karst Suoimuoi catchment in Vietnam. Environ Geol 48:931–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makridakis S, Wheelwright SC, McGee VE (1983) Forecasting methods and applications, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangin A (1975a) Contribution a` l’e´tude hydrodynamique des aquife`res karstiques. Ann Spe´le´ologie 29(3):283–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangin A (1975b) Contribution a` l’e´tude hydrodynamique des aquife`res karstiques. Ann Spe´le´ologie 29(4):495–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangin A (1975c) Contribution a` l’e´tude hydrodynamique des aquife`res karstiques”. Ann Spe´le´ologie 30(1):21–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China (2000) Standard for hydrological information and hydrological forecasting, Beijing, China. Water Power Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models, part I. A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla A, Pulido-Bosch A (2008) Simple procedure to simulate karstic aquifers. Hydrol Process 22:1876–1884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning internal representations by error propagation. Parallel Distrib Process 1:318–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun AY, Painter SL, Green RT (2005) Modeling Barton springs segment of the Edwards aquifer using MODFLOW-DCM. In: Proceedings of sinkholes and the engineering and environmental impacts of Karst, pp 163–177

  • Wang W, van Gelder PHAJM, Vrijling JK, Ma J (2006) Forecasting daily streamflow using hybrid ANN models. J Hydrol 324:383–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Govindaraju S (2000) Prediction of watershed runoff using bayesian concepts and modular neural networks. Water Resour Res 36:753–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Subbarayan G (2002) An evaluation of back-propagation neural networks for the optimal design of structural systems: part I. Training procedures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191:2873–2886

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51109192) and the Fundamental Research Funds for National University, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) (CUGL100220) and Juzheng Fund on Environmental Protection (201203904).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China

    Xianmeng Meng, Maosheng Yin & Libo Ning

  2. School of Water Resources and Hydropower, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, 710048, China

    Dengfeng Liu

  3. School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, University of Oklahoma, National Weather Center, Norman, 73072, USA

    Xianwu Xue

Authors
  1. Xianmeng Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maosheng Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Libo Ning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dengfeng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xianwu Xue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xianmeng Meng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meng, X., Yin, M., Ning, L. et al. A threshold artificial neural network model for improving runoff prediction in a karst watershed. Environ Earth Sci 74, 5039–5048 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4562-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4562-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation