Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Landscape dynamic characteristics using satellite data for a mountainous watershed of Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The changes in land use/land cover (LULC) play a major role in the study of various aspects of environmental issues. Land use is the results of various socioeconomic activities taking place at various urban and regional setups. In this paper, landscape dynamic characteristics are investigated by using remote sensing and geographic information system in mountainous watershed of Abha, Saudi Arabia. Land use classes were mapped and assessed from a time series of maps of year 2000–2010. The LULC transformations were also analyzed according to elevation and slope. Assessment of the data shows that LULC had undergone substantial changes in this semi-arid mountainous watershed from 2000 to 2010. During this period, the sparse vegetation and water bodies decreased from 48.47 to 39.31 km2 and 0.30 to 0.11 km2, respectively, whereas build-up area increased from 17.02 to 36.36 km2. The area under water bodies has reduced due to construction activities, disturbance in drainage network, and sedimentation in the watershed. The areas having high altitudes were exposed to changes in landscape characteristic. In the regions having lower altitude (1,950–2,350), an agricultural land has decreased, whereas build-up land has increased. As a result of rough structure, only small flat areas, located in this sections and valley channels, may be used as build-up land. Slope gradient had also an influence on the distribution of LULC. The assessment of land use and land cover type distribution by slope category provided the baseline for the implementation of the nationwide land conservation policy of conversion of agricultural land to forestland in order to control high soil erosion risk. The changes in land use and land cover in the studied watershed were mainly controlled by human factors (land management, construction, and population pressure) rather than natural factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abulfatih HA (1984) Wild plants from Abha and the surrounding areas. Saudia Publishing and Distributing house, Jeddah

  • Anderson JR, Hardy EE, Roach JT, Witmer RE (1976) A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper No. 964, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USA

  • Bahadur KCK (2009) Improving LANDSAT and IRS image classification: evaluation of unsupervised and supervised classification through band ratios and DEM in a mountainous landscape in Nepal. Remote Sens 1(4):1257–1272. doi:10.3390/rs1041257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahadur KCK (2011) Spatio-temporal patterns of agricultural expansion and its effect on watershed degradation: a case from the mountains of Nepal. Environ Earth Sci 65:2063–2077. doi:10.1007/s12665-011-1186-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattarai K, Conway D (2008) Evaluating land use dynamics and forest cover change in Nepal’s Bara district (1973–2003). Human Ecol 36:81–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briney A (2008) GIS an overview of Geographical Information Systems. http://geography.about.com/od/geographyinter/a/gisoverview.htm

  • Carlson TN, Azofeifa SGA (1999) Satellite remote sensing of land use changes in and around San Jose´, Costa Rica. Remote Sens Environ 70:247–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congalton RG (1991) A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ 37:35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David PM (2011) Biodiversity conservation in the arabian peninsula zoology in the middle east, Supplementum: 13–20. ISSN 0939-7140 © Kasparek, Heidelberg

  • Dwivedi RS, Sreenivas K, Ramana KV (2005) Land-use/land-cover change analysis in part of Ethiopia using Landsat Thematic Mapper data. Int J Remote Sens 26(7):1285–1287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastman JR (1995) IDRIS for windows, user’s guide. Clark University, Worcester, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Feranec J, Jaffrain G, Soukup T, Hazeu G (2010) Determining changes and flows in European landscapes 1990–2000 using CORINE land cover data. Appl Geogr 30(1):19–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gautam AP, Shivakoti GP, Webb EL (2004) Forest cover change, physiography, local economy, and institution in a mountain watershed in Nepal. Environ Manage 33:48–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerschman JP, Paruelo JM, Bela CD, Giallorenzi MC, Pacin F (2003) Land cover classification in the Argentine Pampas using multi-temporal Landsat TM data. Int J Remote Sens 24:3381–3402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton RE (1932) Drainage basin characteristics, Transactions-American Geophysical Union, vol 13, pp 350–361

  • Hu HB, Liu HY, Hao JF, An J (2012) Analysis of land use change characteristics based on remote sensing and GIS in the Jiuxiang River watershed. Int J Smart Sens Intell Syst 5(4):811–823

  • Jensen JR (1996) Introductory digital image processing, 2nd edn. Prentice-hall Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen JR (2007) Introductory digital image processing: a remote sensing perspective. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

  • Lillesand TM, Kiefer RW (1999) Remote sensing and image interpretation. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo´pez S, Sierra R (2010) Agricultural change in the Pastaza River Basin: a spatially explicit model of native Amazonian cultivation. Appl Geogr 29. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.10.004

  • Mallick J, Rahman A, Singh CK (2013a) Modeling urban heat Islands in heterogeneous land surface and its correlation with impervious surface area by using night-time ASTER satellite data in highly urbanizing city, Delhi- India. Adv Space Res 52(4):639–655

  • Mallick J, Alashker Y, Mohammad S, Ahmed M, Hasan M (2013b) Risk assessment of soil erosion in semi-arid mountainous watershed in Saudi Arabia by RUSLE model coupled with remote sensing and GIS. Geocarto International, Taylor and Francis, UK, pp 1–26. doi:10.1080/10106049.2013.868044

  • Mark M, Kudakwashe M (2011) An assessment of the land use and land cover changes in Shurugwi district Zimbabwe. Ethiop J Environ Stud Manage 4(1):81–92

  • Mas JF, Velazquez A, Gallegos JRD, Saucedo RM, Alcantare C, Bocco G, Castro R, Fernandez T, Vega AP (2004) Assessing land use/cover changes: a nationwide multi-date spatial database for Mexico. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 5:249–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas MS (2005) The remote sensing tutorial, NASA’s Goddard, USA. https://www.fas.org/irp/imint/docs/rst/Front/overview.html

  • Ren FP, Jiang Y, Xiong X, Dong MY, Wang B (2011) Characteristics of the spatial–temporal differences of land use changes in the Dongjiang River Basin from 1990 to 2009. Res Sci 33(1):143–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JF, Maestre FT, Kemp PR, Stafford-Smith DM, Lambin E (2007) Natural and human dimensions of land degradation in drylands: causes and consequences. In: Canadell JG, Pataki DE, Pitelka LF (eds) Terrestrial ecosystems in a changing world (global change—the IGBP series). Springer, Berlin, pp 247–257

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rogana J, Chen D (2004) Remote sensing technology for mapping and monitoring land-cover and landuse change. Progress Plan 61:301–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfield GH, Fitzpatrick-Lins K (1986) A coefficient of agreement on a measure of thematic classification accuracy. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 52:223–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumm S (1956) Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badland at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Bull Geol Soc Am 67:597–646

  • Schulz JJ, Cayuela L, Echeverria Salas J, Rey Benayas JM (2010) Monitoring land cover change of the dryland forest landscape of Central Chile (1975–2008). Appl Geogr 30:436–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stehman SV (1996) Estimation of Kappa coefficient and its variance using stratified random sampling. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 26:401–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari MK, Saxena A (2011) Change detection of land use/land cover pattern in and around Mandideep and Obedullaganj area, using remote sensing and GIS. Int J Technol Eng Syst (IJTES) 2(3)

  • Turner BL, Moss RH, Skole DL (1993) Relating land use and global land-cover change: a proposal for an IGBP-HDP core project. Report from the IGBPHDP Working Group on Land-Use/Land-Cover Change. Joint publication of the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (Report No. 24) and the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Programme (Report No. 5). Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences

  • Vitousek PM (1994) Beyond global warming: ecology and global change. Ecology 75(7):1861–1876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie DS, Finn JT (1996) Remote sensing imagery for natural resources monitoring. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Ren L, Singh VP (2012) Impacts of land use and land cover changes on evapotranspiration and runoff at Shalamulun River watershed, China. Hydrol Res 43(1-2):23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng F (2006) Effect of vegetation changes on soil erosion on the Loess Plateau. Pedosphere 16(4):420–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support by Deanship of Scientific Research, King Khalid University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; Project Code: 62/2012/13. We are also thankful to anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions, which helped us in improving the manuscript. NASA-USGS personnel at the land DAAC provided the latest ASTER-Terra satellite image was greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering, King Khalid University, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA)

    Javed Mallick, Hussein Al-Wadi & Mohd Ahmed

  2. Department of Geography, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India

    Atiqur Rahman

Authors
  1. Javed Mallick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hussein Al-Wadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Atiqur Rahman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mohd Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atiqur Rahman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mallick, J., Al-Wadi, H., Rahman, A. et al. Landscape dynamic characteristics using satellite data for a mountainous watershed of Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Environ Earth Sci 72, 4973–4984 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3408-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3408-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation