Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of chemical immobilization treatments for reducing arsenic transport in red mud

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Red mud (RM) was produced during alumina production from bauxite known as the Bayer process. Arsenic was detected in the solid phase of RM (RMsf) which was disposed in the disposal area. This study investigates the effectiveness of using Zero-valent iron (ZVI), ferrihydrite, ferrous sulfate (FeSO4), waste acid (WA) or CO2 for immobilization of arsenic in the RMsf. To test the effect of the amendments on the arsenic leachability, the RMsf samples were amended with the iron-based materials or acidifiers at various w/w (weight/weight) ratios (1–10 %) for 30 days. The leachability of arsenic in the RMsf was evaluated by a 4-step water elusion process. After 30-day treatment of the RMsf, the leachability of As decreased from an initial (12.7 %) to (7.0 %) with a w/w ratio of 5 % ZVI (0 %) with 5 % FeSO4·7H2O, (3.4 %) with 5 % ferryhydrite, (2.0 %) with 6 % WA and (11.8 %) with 6 % CO2. FeSO4·7H2O and WA showed more effectively than other amendments for immobilizing arsenic. Arsenic fractionation with a sequential extraction procedure was used to evaluate the arsenic migration potential in the RMsf. FeSO4 and WA were effective in increasing the hydrous oxide combined arsenic in the RMsf. The leachable Cl and SO4 2− in the RMsf increased from 2.9 to 14.1 mg/g and 19.9–44.4 mg/g with 6 % WA and 5 % FeSO4·7H2O added, respectively. The estimated cost of the FeSO4 and WA treatment was 0.47 and 0.49 USD per ton, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amstaetter K, Borch T, Larese-Casanova P, Kappler A (2010) Redox transformation of arsenic by Fe(II)-activated goethite (alpha-FeOOH). Environ Sci Technol 44:102–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bang S, Korfiatis GP, Meng X (2005) Removal of arsenic from water by zero-valent iron. J Hazard Mater 121:61–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta R, Makris KC, Sarkar D (2007) Arsenic fractionation and bioaccessibility in two alkaline Texas soils incubated with sodium arsenate. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 52:475–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis CC, Chen HW, Edwards M (2001) Modeling silica sorption to iron hydroxide. Environ Sci Technol 36:582–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle P (2010) Hungary toxic disaster—entire villages to be abandoned. http://www.rense.com/general92/d32s.htm

  • Hug S, Leupin O (2003) Iron-catalyzed oxidation of arsenic (III) by oxygen and by hydrogen peroxide: pH-dependent formation of oxidants in the Fenton reaction. Environ Sci Technol 37:2734–2742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klauber C, Gräfe M, Power G (2009) Review of bauxite residue “re-use” options

  • Li Y, Wang J, Luan Z, Liang Z (2010) Arsenic removal from aqueous solution using ferrous based red mud sludge. J Hazard Mater 177:131–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Wang J, Peng X, Ni F, Luan Z (2012) Evaluation of arsenic immobilization in red mud by CO2 or waste acid acidification combined ferrous (Fe 2+) treatment. J Hazard Mater 199–200:43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Ma M, Qin M, Yang L, Wei Y (2010) Studies on the controllable transformation of ferrihydrite. J Solid State Chem 183:2045–2050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning BA, Fendorf SE, Goldberg S (1998) Surface structures and stability of arsenic(III) on goethite: spectroscopic evidence for inner-sphere complexes. Environ Sci Technol 32:2383–2388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miretzky P, Cirelli AF (2010) Remediation of arsenic-contaminated soils by iron amendments: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 40:93–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahu RC, Patel RK, Ray BC (2010) Neutralization of red mud using CO2 sequestration cycle. J Hazard Mater 179:28–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidel H, Görsch K, Amstätter K, Mattusch J (2005) Immobilization of arsenic in a tailings material by ferrous iron treatment. Water Res 39:4073–4082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman DM, Randall SR (2003) Surface complexation of arsenic(V) to iron(III) (hydr)oxides: structural mechanism from ab initio molecular geometries and EXAFS spectroscopy. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 67:4223–4230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soner Altundogan H, Altundogan S, Tümen F, Bildik M (2000) Arsenic removal from aqueous solutions by adsorption on red mud. Waste Manage 20:761–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushil S, Batra V (2008) Catalytic applications of red mud, an aluminium industry waste: a review. Appl Catal B Environ 81:64–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokoro C, Yatsugi Y, Koga H, Owada S (2009) Sorption mechanisms of arsenate during coprecipitation with ferrihydrite in aqueous solution. Environ Sci Technol 44:638–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waychunas G, Rea B, Fuller C, Davis J (1993) Surface chemistry of ferrihydrite: part 1. EXAFS studies of the geometry of coprecipitated and adsorbed arsenate. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 57:2251–2269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel WW, Kirchbaumer N, Prohaska T, Stingeder G, Lombi E, Adriano DC (2001) Arsenic fractionation in soils using an improved sequential extraction procedure. Anal Chim Acta 436:309–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xenidis A, Stouraiti C, Papassiopi N (2010) Stabilization of Pb and As in soils by applying combined treatment with phosphates and ferrous iron. J Hazard Mater 177:929–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Pu J (2011) Mineral materials as feasible amendments to stabilize heavy metals in polluted urban soils. J. Environ Sci China 23:607–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support provided by the National High Technology R&D Program (863) from Ministry of Science & Technology of China (under Grant No. 2008AA06A409-3, 2011AA060701), and Shanghai Tongji Gao TingYao Environmental Science & Technology Development Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, Y., Wang, J., Su, Y. et al. Evaluation of chemical immobilization treatments for reducing arsenic transport in red mud. Environ Earth Sci 70, 1775–1782 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2265-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2265-7

Keywords

Navigation