Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Large-scale spatial interpolation of soil pH across the Loess Plateau, China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil pH plays an important role in biogeochemical processes in soils. The spatial distribution of soil pH provides basic and useful information relevant to soil management and agricultural production. To obtain an accurate distribution map of soil pH on the Loess Plateau of China, 382 sampling sites were investigated throughout the region and four interpolation methods, i.e., inverse distance weighting (IDW), splines, ordinary kriging, and cokriging, were applied to produce a continuous soil pH surface. In the study region, soil pH values ranged from 6.06 to 10.76, with a mean of 8.49 and a median of 8.48. Land use type had a significant effect (p < 0.01) on soil pH; grassland soils had higher pHs than cropland and forestland soils. From a regional perspective, soil pH showed weak variation and strong spatial dependence, indicated by the low values of the coefficient of variation (0.05) and the nugget-to-sill ratios (<0.25). Indices of cross-validation, i.e., average error, mean absolute error, root mean square error, and model efficiency coefficient were used to compare the performance of the four different interpolation methods. Kriging methods interpolated more accurately than IDW and splines. Cokriging performed better than ordinary kriging and the accuracy was improved using soil organic carbon as an auxiliary variable. Regional distribution maps of soil pH were produced. The southeastern part of the region had relatively low soil pH values, probably due to higher precipitation, leaching, and higher soil organic matter contents. Areas of high soil pH were located in the north of the central part of the region, possibly associated with the salinization of sandy soils under inappropriate irrigation practices in an arid climate. Map accuracy could be further improved using new methods and incorporating other auxiliary variables, such as precipitation, elevation, terrain attributes, and vegetation types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aciego Pietri JC, Brookes PC (2008) Relationships between soil pH and microbial and microbial properties in a UK arable soil. Soil Bio Biochem 40:1856–1861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akima H (1978) A method of bivariate interpolation and smooth surface fitting for irregularly distributed data points. ACM T Math Softw 4:148–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TH (1998) The influence of acid irrigation and liming on the soil microbial biomass in a Norway spruce (Picea abies[L.]K.) stand. Plant Soil 199:117–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bååth E, Anderson TH (2003) Comparison of soil fungal/bacterial ratios in a pH gradient using physiological and PLFA-based techniques. Soil Bio Biochem 35:955–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai Y, Wang Y (2011) Spatial variability of soil chemical properties in a Jujube slope on the Loess Plateau of China. Soil Sci 176:550–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady L, Weil RR (2002) The Nature and Properties of Soil, 13th edn. Springer, Netherlands, p 249

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambardella CA, Moorman TB, Novak JM, Parkin TB, Karlen DL, Turco RF, Konopka AE (1994) Field-scale variability of soil properties in central iowa soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:1501–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caritat P, Cooper M, Wilford J (2011) The pH of Australian soils: field results from a national survey. Soil Res 49:173–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chagnon M, Paré D, Hébert C, Camiré C (2001) Effect of experimental liming on collembolan communities and soil microbial biomass in a southern Quebec sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) stand. Appl Soil Ecol 17:81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien YJ, Lee DY, Guo HY, Houng KH (1997) Geostatistical analysis of soil properties of mid-west Taiwan soils. Soil Sci 162:291–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ci L, Yang X (2010) Desertification and its control in China. High Education Press, Beijing and Springer, Heidelberg, pp 274–276

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fageria NK, Baligar VC, Donald LS (2008) Ameliorating soil acidity of tropical oxisols by liming for sustainable crop production. Adv Agron 99:345–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao L, Shao MA (2012) The interpolation accuracy for seven soil properties at various sampling scales on the Loess Plateau, China. J Soil Sediment 12:128–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts P (1999) Geostatistics in soil science: state-of-the-art and perspectives. Geoderma 89:1–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotway CA, Ferguson RB, Hergert GW, Peterson TA (1996) Comparison of kriging and inverse-distance methods for mapping soil parameters. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:1237–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He XB, Li ZB, Hao MD, Tang KL, Zheng FL (2003) Down-scale analysis for water scarcity in response to soil–water conservation on Loess Plateau of China. Agr Ecosyst Environ 94:355–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Integrated Survey Team of the Chinese Academy of Sciences on the Loess Plateau (1991) Soil resources and its rational use on the Loess Plateau. Chinese Science and Technology Press, Beijing, pp 157–160 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobbágy EG, Jackson RB (2003) Patterns and mechanisms of soil acidification in the conversion of grasslands to forests. Biogeochemistry 64:205–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmitt SJ, Wright D, Jones DL (2005) Soil acidification used as a management strategy to reduce nitrate losses from agriculture land. Soil Bio Biochem 37:867–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krravchenko AN (2003) Influence of spatial structure on accuracy of interpolation methods. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:1564–1571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laslett GM, McBratney AB, Pahl PJ, Hutchinson MF (1987) Comparison of several spatial prediction methods for soil pH. J Soil Sci 38:325–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu GS, Wang XZ, Zhang ZY, Zhang CH (2008) Spatial variability of soil properties in a tobacco field of central China. Soil Sci 173:659–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu ZP, Shao MA, Wang YQ (2011) Effect of environmental factors on regional soil organic carbon stocks across the Loess Plateau region, China. Agr Ecosyst Environ 142:184–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann KK, Schumann AW, Obreza TA, Harris WG, Shukla S (2010) Spatial variability of soil physical properties affecting Florida citrus production. Soil Sci 175:487–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marstorp H, Guan X, Gong P (2000) Relationship between dsDNA, chloroform labile C and ergosterol in soils of different organic contents and pH. Soil Bio Biochem 32:879–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matheron G (1963) Principles of geostatistics. Econ Geol 58(8):1246–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean EO (1982) Soil pH and lime requirement. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Agron Monogr, vol 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp 199–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Meersmans J, Wesemael BV, Van Molle M (2009) Determining soil organic carbon for agricultural soils: a comparison between the Walkley-Black and the dry combustion methods (north Belgium). Soil Use Manag 25:346–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montagnini F, Haines B, Swank WT (1991) Soil-solution chemistry in black locust, pine/mixed-hardwoods and oak/hickory forest stands in the southern Appalachians, USA. Forest Ecol Manag 40:199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motavalli PP, Palm CA, Parton WJ, Elliott ET, Frey SD (1995) Soil pH and organic C dynamics in tropical forest soils: evidence from laboratory and simulation studies. Soil Bio Biochem 27:1589–1599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part Ι: A discussion of principle. Hydrology 10(3):282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1982) Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis, Part 2, 2nd Edition. Agronomy monograph, vol 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp 534–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen DR, Bouma J (1985) Soil spatial variability. Pudoc, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for the Second National Soil Survey of China (1993) Second National Soil Survey of China. China Agricultural Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Panagopoulos T, Jeusus J, Antunes MDC, Beltrao J (2006) Analysis of spatial interpolation for optimising management of a salinized field cultivated with lettuce. Euro J Agron 24(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi YC (1986) Improvement of saline-alkali soil diagnosis, management and improvement. Agriculture Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi WJ, Liu JY, Du ZP, Song YJ, Chen CF, Yue TX (2009) Surface modeling of soil pH. Geoderma 150:113–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone M (1974) Cross-validation choice and assessment of statistical prediction. J R Stat Soc B 36:111–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun B, Zhou SL, Zhao QG (2003) Evaluation of spatial and temporal changes of soil quality based on geostatistical analysis in the hill region of subtropical China. Geoderma 115:85–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang KL (1991) Soil Erosion on the Loess Plateau: Its Regional Distribution and Control. China Sciences and Technology Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org/. ISBN 3-900051-07-0

  • Thomas DSG, Middleton NJ (1993) Salinization: new perspectives on a major desertification issue. J Arid Environ 24(1):95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace A (1994) Soil acidification from use of too much fertilizer. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 25(1–2):87–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YQ, Zhang XC, Huang CQ (2009) Spatial variability of soil total nitrogen and soil total phosphorus under different land uses in a small watershed on the Loess Plateau, China. Geoderma 150:141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YQ, Shao MA, Zhu YJ, Liu ZP (2011) Impact of land use and plant characteristics on dried soil layers in different climatic regions on the Loess Plateau of China. Agr Forest Meteorol 151:437–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber DD, Englund EJ (1992) Evaluation and comparison of spatial interpolators. Math Geol 24(4):381–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster R, Oliver MA (2001) Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists. John Wiley and Sons, West Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei XR, Shao MA (2009) Spatial distribution and conditional simulation of soil pH values in small watershed of loessial gully region. Tran CSAE 25(5):61–67 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollenhaupt NC, Wolkowski RP, Clayton MK (1994) Mapping soil test phosphorus and potassium for variable-rate fertilizer application. J Prod Agr 7(4):441–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong S, Xiong Z, Wang P (1996) Soil salinity in the irrigated area of the Yellow River in Ningxia, China. Arid Soil Res Rehabil 10:95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang WZ, Shao MA (2000) Soil Water Research on the Loess Plateau. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang JY, Yang XE, He ZL, Li TQ, Shentu JL, Stoffella PJ (2006) Effects of pH, organic acids, and inorganic ions on lead desorption from soils. Environ Poll 143:9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasrebi J, Saffari M, Fathi H, Karimian N, Moazallahi M, Gazni R (2009) Evaluation and comparison of ordinary kriging and inverse distance weighting methods for prediction of spatial variability of some soil chemical parameters. Res J Biol Sci 4:93–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Yue TX, Du ZP, Song YJ, Gong Y (2007) A new method of surface modeling and its application to DEM construction. Geomorphology 91(1–2):161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Mao F, Yang X (2010) Soil salinization and its improvement in arid Hetao plain, InnerMongolia: irrigation roles. Chinese Forestry Sci Tec 9(3):21–35

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Program for Innovative Research Team (No. IRT0749), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41071156 and No. 51179180). We wish to thank the editor and reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. Special thanks also go to Mr. David Warrington for his zealous help in improving the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming An Shao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, Z.P., Shao, M.A. & Wang, Y.Q. Large-scale spatial interpolation of soil pH across the Loess Plateau, China. Environ Earth Sci 69, 2731–2741 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-2095-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-2095-z

Keywords

Navigation