Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Applications of a GIS-based geotechnical tool to assess spatial earthquake hazards in an urban area

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A geotechnical information system (GTIS) was constructed within a spatial geographic information system (GIS) framework to reliably predict geotechnical information and accurately estimate site effects at Gyeongju, an urban area in South Korea. The system was built based on both collected and performed site investigation data in addition to acquired geo-knowledge data. Seismic zoning maps were constructed using the site period (T G) and mean shear wave velocity to a depth of 30 m (V S30), and these maps were presented as a regional strategy to mitigate earthquake-induced risks in the study area. In particular, the T G distribution map indicated the susceptibility to ground motion resonance in periods ranging from 0.2 to 0.5 s and the corresponding seismic vulnerability of buildings with two to five stories. Seismic zonation of site classification according to V S30 values was also performed to determine the site amplification coefficients for seismic design and seismic performance evaluation at any site and administrative subunit in the study area. In addition, we investigated the site effects according to subsurface and surface ground irregularities at Gyeongju by seismic response analyses in time domains based on both two- and three-dimensional spatial finite element models, which were generated using spatial interface coordinates between geotechnical subsurface layers predicted by the GTIS. This practical study verified that spatial GIS-based geotechnical information can be a very useful resource in determining how to best mitigate seismic hazards, particularly in urban areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABAQUS (2007) Abaqus analysis user’s manual version 6.7. Dassault Systèmes

  • Anastasiadis A, Paptakis D, Pitilaks K (2001) Thessaloniki’s detailed microzoning: subsurface structure as basis for site response analysis. Pure Appl Geophys 158(12):2597–2633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autodesk (2007) AutoCAD civil 3D 2008 tutorials. Autodesk, Inc, San Rafael

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakir BS, Ozkan MY, Ciliz C (2002) Effects of basin edge on the distribution of damage in 1995 Dinar, Turkey earthquake. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22(4):335–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borcherdt RD (1994) Estimates of site-dependent response spectra for design (methodology and justification). Earthq Spectra 10(4):617–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cid J, Susagna T, Goula X, Chavarria L, Figueras S, Fleta J, Casas A, Roca A (2001) Seismic zonation of Barcelona based on numerical simulation of site effects. Pure Appl Geophys 158(12):2559–2577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Codermatz R, Nicolich R, Slejko D (2003) Seismic risk assessments and GIS technology: applications to infrastructures in the Friuli-Venezia Giulia region (NE Italy). Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 32(11):1677–1690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CTech (2008) EVS/MVS main help version 9.13. CTech Development Corporation, Laie

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai CS, Siriwardance HJ (1984) Constitutive laws for engineering materials with emphasis on geologic materials. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobry R, Borcherdt RD, Crouse CB, Idriss IM, Joyner WB, Martin GR, Power MS, Rinne EE, Seed RB (2000) New site coefficients and site classification system used in recent building seismic code provisions. Earthq Spectra 16(1):41–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangopadhyay S, Gautam TR, Gupta AD (1999) Subsurface characterization using artificial neural network and GIS. J Comput Civil Eng ASCE 13(3):153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim DS, Chung CK, Sun CG, Bang ES (2002) Site assessment and evaluation of spatial earthquake ground motion of Kyeongju. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22(5):371–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiremidjian AS (1997) Spatial analysis in geotechnical earthquake engineering. In: Frost JD (ed) Spatial analysis in soil dynamics and earthquake engineering. ASCE, Reston, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Korkmaz KA (2009) Earthquake disaster risk assessment and evaluation for Turkey. Environ Geol 57(2):307–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai DC, Murty CVR (2006) Effects of the 2005 Muzaffarabad (Kashmir) earthquake on built environment. Curr Sci 90(8):1066–1070

    Google Scholar 

  • Lara M, Supúlveda SA (2010) Landslide susceptibility and hazard assessment in Sa Ramón Ravine, Santiago de Chile, from an engineering geological approach. Environ Earth Sci 60(6):1227–1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CCJ, Chai JF (2008) Reconnaissance report on the China Wenchuan earthquake May 12 2008. NCREE Newslett 3(3):I1–I5

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin WZ (2008) Earthquake-induced landslide hazard monitoring and assessment using SOM and PROMETHEE techniques: a case study at the Chiufenershan area in Central Taiwan. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 22(9):995–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loenen BV (2009) Developing geographic information infrastructures: the role of access polices. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 23(2):195–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles SB, Ho CL (1999) Applications and issues of GIS as tool for civil engineering modeling. J Comput Civil Eng ASCE 13(3):144–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordenson GJP, Bell GR (2000) Seismic design requirements for region of moderate seismicity. Earthq Spectra 16(1):205–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh S, Sun CG (2008) Combined analysis of electrical resistivity and geotechnical SPT blow counts for the safety assessment of fill dam. Environ Geol 54(1):31–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver MA, Webster R (1990) Kriging: a method of interpolation for geographical information system. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 4(3):313–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen KB (2000) Site amplification in the Los Angeles basin from three-dimensional modeling of ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90(6B):77–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orhan A, Tosun H (2009) Visualization of geotechnical data by means of geographic information system: a case study in Eskisehir city (NW Turkey). Environ Earth Sci. doi:10.1007/s12665-009-0357-1

  • Psarropoulos PN, Gazetas G, Mylonakis G, Tazoh T (2001) Soil and valley effects in bridge foundation motion. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, San Diego, paper no 10.60

  • Rashed T, Weeks J (2003) Assessing vulnerability to earthquake hazards through spatial multicriteria analysis of urban areas. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 17(6):547–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockaway TD (1997) Spatial assessment of earthquake induced geotechnical hazards. Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology

  • Sun CG (2004) Geotechnical information system and site amplification characteristics for earthquake ground motions at inland of the Korean peninsula. Ph.D. Dissertation, Seoul National University

  • Sun CG, Chun SH, Ha TG, Chung CK, Kim DS (2008) Development and application of GIS-based tool for earthquake-induced hazard prediction. Comput Geotech 35(3):436–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun CG, Chung CK (2008) Assessment of site effects of a shallow and wide basin using geotechnical information-based spatial characterization. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28(12):1028–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun CG, Kim DS, Chung CK (2005) Geologic site conditions and site coefficients for estimating earthquake ground motions in the inland areas of Korea. Eng Geol 81(4):446–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams T, Szary P, Thomann T, Konnerth C, Nemeth E (2002) GIS Applications in Geotechnical Engineering. Final Report FHWA 2002-06, US Federal Highway Administration

  • Wills CJ, Petersen M, Bryant WA, Reichle M, Saucedo GJ, Tan S, Taylor G, Treiman J (2000) A site-conditions map for California based on geology and shear-wave velocity. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90(6B):187–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Bielak J, Ghattas O, Wang J (2003) Three-dimensional nonlinear seismic ground motion modeling in basins. Phys Earth Planet Inter 137(1):81–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author expresses the gratitude for the support from the Korea Meteorological Administration Research and Development Program under Grant CATER 2008-5504.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Earthquake Research Center, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, 124 Gwahang-no, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-350, Korea

    Chang-Guk Sun

Authors
  1. Chang-Guk Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang-Guk Sun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sun, CG. Applications of a GIS-based geotechnical tool to assess spatial earthquake hazards in an urban area. Environ Earth Sci 65, 1987–2001 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1180-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1180-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation