Skip to main content
Log in

On the value of dolines in gypsum terrains as a “Geological Heritage”: an example from Sivas basin, Turkey

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Karst topography is a landscape shaped by the dissolution of a layer or layers of soluble bedrock, usually limestone and evaporites. Karstification in the Sivas basin (Turkey) has sculpted a beautiful landscape with a distinctive beauty and appeal for both local inhabitants and visitors. Dolines are very special geological landscape features found in karst regions, and the Sivas basin has several giant dolines amongst its thousands of smaller dolines. The basin constitutes a distinctive karst architecture with a system of collapse and/or dolines and caves. Anyone who walks along the shores of a lake resulting from the collapse, in this gypsum terrain, will be amazed with the lake and rocks that surround them. In this paper, dolines in the gypsum terrain are evaluated and discussed according to their value as a “Geological Heritage”. Three main characteristics of dolines, namely their scientific, aesthetic and ecosystem importance are considered and discussed. Dolines and karstified areas as representative examples of landform types possess the three attributes for them to be considered as a Geological Heritage in that they demonstrate the effect of erosion on the landform, geomorphic processes that are still active and a range of features characteristic of the rock unit involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexandrowicz Z, Urban J, Miskiewicz K (2009) Geological values of selected Polish properties of the UNESCO World Heritage list. Geoheritage 1:43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck BF (ed) (1984) Sinkholes: their geology, engineering, and environmental impact. In: Proceedings of the first multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes, Balkema, Rotterdam, p 429

  • Beck BF (ed) (1989) Environmental and engineering impacts of sinkholes and karst. In: Proceedings of the third multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes and the engineering and environmental ımpacts of karst, Balkema, Rotterdam, p 384

  • Beck BF (ed) (1993) Applied karst geology.In: Proceedings of the fourth multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes and the engineering and environmental ımpacts of karst, Balkema, Rotterdam, p 295

  • Beck BF, Pearson FM (eds) (1995) Karst geohazards. In: Proceedings of the fifth multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes and the engineering and environmental ımpacts of karst, Balkema, Gatlinburg, Tennessee, p 581

  • Beck BF, Stephenson JB (eds) (1997) The engineering geology and hydrogeology of karst terranes. In: Proceedings of the sixth multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes and the engineering and environmental ımpacts of karst, Balkema Rotterdam, p 516

  • Beck BF, Wilson WL (eds) (1987) Karst hydrogeology: engineering and environmental applications. In: Proceedings of the second multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes and the environmental ımpacts of karst, Balkema, Rotterdam, p 467

  • Beck BF, Pettit AJ, Herring JG (eds) (1999) Hydrogeology and engineering geology of sinkholes and karst—1999. In: Proceedings of the seventh multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes and the environmental and engineering ımpacts of karst, Balkema, Rotterdam, p 478

  • Bögli A (1980) Karst hydrology and physical speleology (Translated by June C. Schmidt). Springer, New York, p 284

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Culshaw MG, Waltham AC (1987) Natural and artificial cavities as ground engineering hazards. Q J Eng Geol 20:139–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle P, Easterbrook E, Reid E et al (1994) In: Wilson C (ed) Earth heritage conservation. Geological Society of London, London

  • Eder W (2001) Geosites reserves and world heritage: ıntegrating, sustainable management of natural resources, protection, education and research. In: Marinos, Koukis, Tsiambaos, Stournaras (eds) Engineering Geology and the Environment. Balkema, Rotterdem, pp 3367–3671

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunay G (2002) Gypsum Karst, Sivas, Turkey. Environ Geol 42:387–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce EB (1995) Assessing the significance of geological heritage: a methodology study for the Australian Heritage Commission. A report prepared for the Australian Heritage Commission by the Standing Committee for Geological Heritage of the Geological Society of Australia Inc. Executive Summary. Available via http://web.earthsci.unimelb.edu.au/Joyce/heritage/methodology1.html. Accessed 5 Jan 2009

  • Kacaroglu F, Degirmenci M, Cerit O (1997) Karstification in Miocene gypsum: an example from Sivas, Turkey. Environ Geol 30(1–2):88–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Karacan E, Yilmaz I (1997) Collapse dolines in the Miocene gypsum: an example from SW Sivas (Turkey). Environ Geol 29(3/4):263–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimchouk AB, Lowe DJ, Cooper AH, Sauro K (eds) (1996) Gypsum karst of the world. Int J Speleol, Theme issue 25(3–4): 1–307

  • Pena dos Reis R, Henriques MH (2009) Approaching an integrated qualification and evaluation system for geological heritage. Geoheritage 1:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvati R, Sasowsky ID (2002) Development of collapse sinkholes in areas of groundwater discharge. J Hydrol 264:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivaci ER, Kilinc S, Dere S (2007) Relationships between epipelic diatom taxa (Bacillariophyceae) and nutrients in two karstic lakes in central Anatolia, Turkey. J Freshwater Ecol 22(3):515–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivaci ER, Cankaya E, Kilinc S, Dere S (2008) Seasonal assessment of epiphytic diatom distribution and diversity in relation to environmental factors in a karstic lake (Central Turkey). Nova Hedwigia 86(1–2):215–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuyukina TY (2009) Geochemical studies of northern taiga (gypsum) karst ecosystems and their high vulnerability to natural and anthropogenic hazards. Environ Geol 58(2):269–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unver B (1998) An investigation on the reproduction properties of chub, Leuciscus cephalus (L., 1758) in Lake Todurge (Zara/Sivas). Turk J Zool 22:141–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltham AC, Fookes PG (2005) Engineering classification of karst ground conditions. Speleogenesis Evol Karst Aquifers 3(1):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • White WB (1988) Geomorphology and hydrology of karst terrains. Oxford Univ. Press, England, p 464

    Google Scholar 

  • White S, Mitchell M (2006) Geological heritage sites: a procedure and protocol for documentation and assessment. AESC, Melbourne, Australia, p 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I (2007a) GIS based susceptibility mapping of karst depression in gypsum: a case study from Sivas basin (Turkey). Eng Geol 90:89–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I (2007b) Differences on the geotechnical properties of the two types of gypsum: alabastrine and porphyritic. Bull Eng Geol Environ 66(2):187–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I, Karacan E (2005) Slaking durability and its effect on the doline occurrence in the gypsum. Environ Geol 47(7):1010–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is deeply grateful to Dr. Robbie Kleywegt for his very sensitive review, very kind and constructive comments and editing the paper that led to the improvement of the quality of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Işık Yilmaz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yilmaz, I. On the value of dolines in gypsum terrains as a “Geological Heritage”: an example from Sivas basin, Turkey. Environ Earth Sci 65, 805–812 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1125-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1125-6

Keywords

Navigation