Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Geologic assessment and injection design for a pilot CO2-enhanced oil recovery and sequestration demonstration in a heterogeneous oil reservoir: Citronelle Field, Alabama, USA

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

CO2 pilot injection studies, with site-specific geologic assessment and engineering reservoir design, can be instrumental for demonstrating both incremental enhanced oil recovery and permanent geologic storage of greenhouse gases. The purpose of this paper is to present the geologic and reservoir analyses in support of a field pilot test that will evaluate the technical and economic feasibility of commercial-scale CO2-enhanced oil recovery to increase oil recovery and extend the productive life of the Citronelle Oil Field, the largest conventional oil field in Alabama (SE USA). Screening of reservoir depth, oil gravity, reservoir pressure, reservoir temperature, and oil composition indicates that the Cretaceous-age Donovan sand, which has produced more than 169 × 106 bbl in Citronelle Oil Field, is amenable to miscible CO2 flooding. The project team has selected an 81 ha (200 ac) 5-spot test site with one central gas injector, two producers, and two initially temporarily abandoned production wells that are now in production. Injection is planned in two separate phases, each consisting of 6,804 t (7,500 short tons) of food-grade CO2. The Citronelle Unit B-19-10 #2 well (Permit No. 3232) is the CO2 injector for the first injection test. The 14-1 and 16-2 sands of the upper Donovan are the target zones. These sandstone units consist of fine to medium-grained sandstone that is enveloped by variegated mudstone. Both of these sandstone units were selected based on the distribution of perforated zones in the test pattern, production history, and the ability to correlate individual sandstone units in geophysical well logs. The pilot injections will evaluate the applicability of tertiary oil recovery to Citronelle Field and will provide a large volume of information on the pressure response of the reservoirs, the mobility of fluids, time to breakthrough, and CO2 sweep efficiency. The results of the pilot injections will aid in the formulation of commercial-scale reservoir management strategies that can be applied to Citronelle Field and other geologically heterogeneous oil fields and the design of similar pilot injection projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Advanced Resources International (2006) Ten basin oriented strategies for CO2 enhanced oil recovery—an analysis by advanced resources international, Arlington, VA, for the United States Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy. http://www.fossil.energy.gov/programs/oilgas/eor/Ten_Basin-Oriented_CO2-EOR_Assessments.html. Updated 8 March 2006

  • Austell JM (2005) CO2 for enhanced oil recovery needs. Business briefing—exploration and production: the oil and gas review, 3 p

  • Bolin DE, Mann SD, Burroughs D, Moore HE, Powers TL (1989) Petroleum atlas of southwestern Alabama. Alabama Geological Survey Atlas 23, 218 p

  • Brock WR, Bryan LA (1989) Summery results of CO2 EOR field tests. SPE Paper 18977 presented at the joint Rocky Mountain Regional/low permeability reservoir symposium and exhibit, 6–8 March 1989. Denver, CO

  • Claypool GE, Mancini EA (1989) Geochemical relationships of petroleum in Mesozoic reservoirs to carbonate source rocks of Jurassic Smackover Formation, southwestern Alabama. AAPG Bull 73:904–924

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Energy (2006) Improving CO2 efficiency for recovering oil in heterogeneous reservoirs. In: CO2 EOR Technology, Office of Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, pp 16–17. http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/oilgas/publications/brochures/CO2Brochure_Mar2006.pdf

  • Eaves E (1976) Citronelle Oil Field, Mobile County, Alabama. AAPG Mem 24:259–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Esposito RA, Pashin JC, Walsh PM (2008) Citronelle dome: a giant opportunity for multi-zone carbon storage and enhanced oil recovery in the Mississippi Interior Salt Basin of Alabama. Environ Geosci 15:53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler ML, Safley LE, Young MA, Stechmann RH, Blair ES, Crumb RE (1998) Reservoir management strategy for Citronelle Field, Mobile County, Alabama. US Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, NIPER/BDM-0353

  • Fretwell JA, Blair ES (1999) Optimized hydraulic pumping system keeps deep water flood economical. World Oil, November

  • Gilchrist RE (1981) Miscibility study (repeat 50% P.V. Slug) in cores. Citronelle Unit, Mobile County, Alabama. Unpublished report, 3 November 1981

  • Gilchrist RE (1982) Evaluation of produced fluids from the carbon dioxide pilot area in the Citronelle Unit, Unpublished report

  • Grigg RB, Svec RK, Zeng ZW, Bai B, Liu Y (2005) Improving CO2 efficiency for recovering oil in heterogeneous reservoirs. New Mexico Petroleum Recovery Research Center, Institute of Mining and Technology. Final report under DOE contract number DE-FG26-01BC15364

  • Holtz MH, Núñez López V, Breton CL (2005) Moving Permian Basin technology to the Gulf Coast: the geologic distribution of CO2 EOR potential in Gulf Coast reservoirs, In: Luftholm PH, Cox D (eds) Unconventional reservoirs. West Texas Geological Society Publication #05-115, Fall Symposium, 26–27 October 2005

  • Hustad CW, Austell JM (2004) Mechanisms and incentives to promote the use and storage of CO2 in the North Sea. European energy law report I, Intersentia, Oxford, pp 355–380

  • Kennedy JR, Bett TG, Gilchrist RE (1983) Reservoir engineering study of the CO2 project in the Citronelle Unit, Mobile County, Alabama. Unpublished report, 18 February 1983

  • Kovscek AR (2002) Screening criteria for CO2 storage in oil reservoirs. Pet Sci Technol 20(7, 8):841–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuuskraa VA, Lynch R, Fokin M (2004) Site selection and process identification for CO2 capture and storage test centers. Summary report: Geologic assessment of CO2 storage options, four proposed Southern company power plants, prepared under agreement No. E2-P79/C5887 for the Electric Power Research Institute by Advanced Resources International, Arlington, VA, 26 March 2004

  • Mack GH, James WC, Monger HC (1993) Classification of paleosols. Geol Soc Am Bull 105:129–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mancini EA, Puckett TM (2002) Transgressive-regressive cycles in Lower Cretaceous strata, Mississippi Interior Salt Basin area of the northeastern Gulf of Mexico, USA. Cretac Res 23:409–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mancini EA, Puckett TM (2005) Jurassic and Cretaceous transgressive-regressive (T-R) cycles, northern Gulf of Mexico, USA. Stratigraphy 2:30–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin DF, Taber JJ (1992) Carbon dioxide flooding. J Pet Technol 44:396–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Odenberger M, Svensson R (2003) Transportation systems for CO2—application to carbon sequestration. MSc Thesis, Department of Energy Conversion, Chalmers University of Technology

  • Pashin JC, Payton JW (2005) Geological sinks for carbon sequestration in Alabama, Mississippi, and the Florida panhandle. Alabama Geological Survey, Final Report to Southern States Energy Board, Subgrant SSEB-NT41980-997-GSA-2004-00, unpaginated CD-ROM

  • Retallack GJ (1990) Soils of the past. Unwin Hyman, Boston, p 520

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens SH, Pearce JM, Rigg AAJ (2001) Natural analogs for geologic storage of CO2: an integrated global research program, First national conference on carbon sequestration. US Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Washington, DC, 15–17 May 2001

  • Taber JJ, Martin FD, Seright RS (1997) EOR screening criteria revisited-Part 2: applications and impact of oil prices. SPE Reserv Eng 12(3):199–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson MD, Warne JR (1964) Sand continuity study: Citronelle Field, Mobile County, Alabama. Unpublished study prepared for Unit Manager, Citronelle Unit

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the US Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory under Cooperative Agreement No. DE-FC26-06NT43029 with the University of Alabama at Birmingham. The work is also supported by Denbury Resources, Southern Company, the Geological Survey of Alabama, the University of Alabama, and the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. Participation in the research program by Jack C. Pashin of the Geological Survey of Alabama is supported, in part, by the US Minerals Management Service (MMS) under Agreement No. 1435-01-04-CA-37582.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard A. Esposito.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Esposito, R.A., Pashin, J.C., Hills, D.J. et al. Geologic assessment and injection design for a pilot CO2-enhanced oil recovery and sequestration demonstration in a heterogeneous oil reservoir: Citronelle Field, Alabama, USA. Environ Earth Sci 60, 431–444 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0495-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0495-5

Keywords

Navigation