Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison study of methane emissions from landfills with different landfill covers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Atmospheric methane, a more effective heat-trapping gas than CO2 that may affect climate change, has its greatest man-made source in the US from municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills. Consequently, the wise management of landfills can reduce these greenhouse gas emissions to the atmosphere. Methane from modern MSW landfills built with composite covers is frequently vented directly to the atmosphere. Biofiltration of landfill gas could oxidize CH4 to CO2 and water. Methane oxidation in old landfills with conventional soil covers can be effective in reducing the amount of CH4 emitted. In this study, comparison of methane emissions from three different landfill covers was conducted. Methane emissions from old landfills constructed with conventional soil covers, modern MSW landfills constructed with composite covers, and modern MSW landfills constructed with composite covers plus biofilters were calculated using the calculated CH4 oxidation rates. The results showed that an average of only 14% of the generated CH4 was emitted from landfills with modern composite covers plus biofilters, and an average of 85% of the generated CH4 was emitted from landfills with conventional covers when 100% of the generated CH4 emissions to the atmosphere from landfills with modern composite covers was assumed. By comparing the CH4 emission rates from three different landfill types, the use of a properly sized biofilter should be an effective technique to reduce CH4 emissions from landfills across the USA and potentially in many other areas of the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boeckx P, Cleemput OV (1996) Methane oxidation in a neutral landfill cover soil: influence of moisture content, temperature, and nitrogen-turnover. J Environ Qual 25:178–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeckx P, Van Cleemput O, Villaralvo I (1996) Methane emission from a landfill and the methane oxidizing capacity of its covering soil. Soil Biol Biochem 28:1397–1405. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(96)00147-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christophersen M, Linderod L, Jensen PE, Kjeldsen P (2000) Methane oxidation at low temperatures in soil exposed to landfill gas. J Environ Qual 29:1989–1997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Visscher AD, Schippers M, Van Cleemput O (2001) Short-term kinetic response of enhanced methane oxidation in landfill cover soils to environmental factors. Biol Fertil Soil 33:231–237. doi:10.1007/s003740000313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doorn MRJ, Stefanski LA, Barlaz MA (1994) Estimate of methane emissions from US landfills. EPA/600/SR-94/166. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

  • Hilger HA, Wollum AG, Barlaz MA (2000) Landfill methane oxidation response to vegetation, fertilization, and liming. J Environ Qual 29:324–334

    Google Scholar 

  • McBean EA, Rovers FA, Farquhar GJ (1995) Opportunities for reduction, reuse, and recycling. Solid waste landfill engineering and design. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, p 12

    Google Scholar 

  • Park S, Brown KW, Thomas JC (2002) The effect of various environmental and design parameters on methane oxidation in a model biofilter. Waste Manage Res 20:434–444. doi:10.1177/0734242X0202000507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park S, Brown KW, Thomas JC (2004) The use of biofilters to reduce atmospheric methane emissions from landfills. Part I. Biofilter design. Water Air Soil Pollut 155:63–85. doi:10.1023/B:WATE.0000026522.36984.42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park S, Lee I, Cho C, Sung K (2008) Effects of earthworm cast and powdered activated carbon on methane removal capacity of landfill cover soils. Chemosphere 70:1117–1123. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.07.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park S, Lee C, Ryu C, Sung K (2009) Biofiltration for reducing methane emissions from modern sanitary landfills at the low methane generation stage. Water Air Soil Pollut 196:19–27. doi:10.1007/s11270-008-9754-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peer RL, Epperson DL, Cambell DL, Brook PV (1992) Development of an empirical model of methane emissions from landfills. EPA-600/R-92-037. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

  • Steuteville R (1996) The state of garbage in America. Biocycle 37:35–41

    Google Scholar 

  • US Census Bureau, Department of Commerce (1998) Historical national population estimates: 1 July 1990 to 1 July 1997. Internet release date: April 1998. http://www.census.gov/population/estimates/nation/popclokest.txt

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (1997) The MSW fact book Version 4.0 Office of Soil Waste; US Government Printing Office: Washington, DC

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (2007) Inventory of US greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2005. EPA/430/R-06-002

  • Whalen SC, Reeburgh WS, Sandbeck KA (1990) Rapid methane oxidation in a landfill cover soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:3405–3411

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kijune Sung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, S., Brown, K.W., Thomas, J.C. et al. Comparison study of methane emissions from landfills with different landfill covers. Environ Earth Sci 60, 933–941 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0229-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0229-8

Keywords

Navigation