Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Polymerase chain reaction confirmation of diagnosis of intestinal amebiasis in Puducherry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Stool microscopy, the commonly used test for diagnosis of intestinal amebiasis, is unreliable as it does not differentiate Entamoeba histolytica, the causative agent for amebiasis, from non-pathogenic Entamoeba dispar and Entamoeba moshkovskii.

Methods

Two hundred and forty-six stool samples collected between January to February 2009, were examined microscopically for E. histolytica/E. dispar/E. moshkovskii complex cysts and trophozoites. Nested multiplex PCR targeting a 16 S-like rRNA gene for differential detection of all the three morphologically similar forms of E. histolytica, E. moshkovskii and E. dispar simultaneously was done on all microscopy positive stool samples.

Results

Forty-nine stool samples were positive for Entamoeba spp. by microscopy. Nested multiplex PCR for E. histolytica, E. moshkovskii and E. dispar was positive in only 19 of these samples, and only 6 of the 19 samples were positive for E. histolytica.

Conclusion

Stool microscopy grossly over-diagnosed intestinal amebiasis and is likely to result in unnecessary treatment with anti-protozoal drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Parija SC. Amoeba. In: Textbook of Medical Parasitology. 3rd edn. All India Publishers and Distributors, New Delhi; 2006. p. 35–67.

  2. Tanyuksel M, Petri WA. Laboratory diagnosis of amebiasis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;16:713–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Garcia LS, Bruckner DA. Diagnostic medical parasitology. Washington: ASM Press; 2007. p. 217–88.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Khairnar K, Parija SC. A novel nested multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for differential detection of Entamoeba histolytica, E. moshkovskii and E. dispar DNA in stool samples. BMC Microbiol. 2007;7:47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fotedar R, Stark D, Beebe N, et al. Laboratory diagnostic techniques for Entamoeba species. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20:511–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stark D, van Hal S, Fotedar R, et al. Comparison of stool antigen detection kits to PCR for diagnosis of amebiasis. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:1678–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bansal D, Sehgal R, Chawla Y, et al. In vitro activity of antiamoebic drugs against clinical isolates of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2004;3:27–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Palomo M, Baez MM. Selective primary health care: strategies for control of disease in the developing world. X. Amebiasis. Rev Infect Dis. 1983;5:1093–102.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank (Dr. K S V K Subba Rao), Director, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry for providing the necessary support.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subhash Chandra Parija.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parija, S.C., Garg, A., Pushpa, K. et al. Polymerase chain reaction confirmation of diagnosis of intestinal amebiasis in Puducherry. Indian J Gastroenterol 29, 140–142 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-010-0033-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-010-0033-0

Keywords

Navigation