Abstract
Purpose
To assess donor site morbidity for patients who underwent mandibular reconstruction by fibula free flap.
Patients and Methods
The data were recorded from medical records and clinical questioner of patients from 2013 to 2016. Predictor variables were drawn from demographics of patients who had mandible defect reconstructed with free fibula flap. The outcome variables were drawn from point evaluation system for pain, walking ability, activities of daily living, gait alteration, cosmetic appearance using validated 10-point self-assessment scale. The assessment was done postoperatively at intervals of 15 days, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months. ANOVA test was used to measure the statistical significance.
Results
There was significant reduction in perception of pain, significant improvement in walking ability, activities of daily living, gait and cosmetic appearance postoperatively after 6 months (P < 0.005).
Conclusion
Point evaluation system is a simple and effective tool to understand the postoperative morbidity. Donor site morbidity following fibula harvest was low without any major complications.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Vittayakittipong P (2013) Donor-site morbidity after fibula free flap transfer: a comparison of subjective evaluation using a visual analogue scale and point evaluation system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:956–961
Taylor GI, Miller GDH, Ham FJ (1975) The free vascularized bone graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 55:533–544
Gilbert A (1979) Vascularized transfer of the fibula shaft. Int J Microsurg 1:100–102
Farhadi J, Valderrabano V, Kunz C, Kern R, Hinterman B, Pierer G (2007) Free fibula donor-site morbidity: clinical and biomechanical analysis. Ann Plast Surg 58:405–410
Lee JH, Chung CY, Myoung H, Kim MJ, Yun PY (2008) Gait analysis of donor leg after free fibular flap transfer. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:625–629
Tang CL, Mahoney JL, Mckee MD, Richards RR, Waddell JP, Louie B (1998) Donor site morbidity following vascularized fibular grafting. Microsurgery 18:383–386
Lin JY, Djohan R, Dobryansky M et al (2009) Assessment of donor site morbidity using balance and gait tests after bilateral fibula osteoseptocutaneous free flap transfer. Ann Plast Surg 62:246–251
Taylor PC (2010) The importance of the patients’ experience of RA compared with clinical measures of disease activity. Clin Exp Rheumatol 28(3 Suppl 59):S28–S31
Bodde EW, de Visser E, Duysens JE et al (2003) Donor-site morbidity after free vascularized autogenous fibular transfer: subjective and quantitative analyses. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:2237–2242
Anthony JP, Rawnsley JD, Benhaim P, Ritter EF, Sadowsky SH, Singer MI (1995) Donor leg morbidity and function after free fibula flap mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 96:146–152
Vail TP, Urbaniak JR (1996) Donor-site morbidity with use of vascularized autogenous fibular grafts. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 78:204–211
Zimmermann CE, Börner BI, Hasse A, Sieg P (2001) Donor site morbidity after microvascular fibula transfer. Clin Oral Investig 5:214–219
Chou SW, Liao HT, Yazar S, Lin CH, Lin YC, Wei FC (2009) Assessment of fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap donor-site morbidity using balance and gait test. J Orthop Res 27:555–560
Hadouiri N, Feuvrier D, Pauchot J, Decavel P, Sagawa Y, (2017) Donor site morbidity after vascularized fibula free flap: gait analysis during prolonged walk conditions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47(3):309–315
Sieg P, Taner C, Hakim SG, Jacobsen HC (2009) Long-term evaluation of donor site morbidity after free fibula transfer. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48:267–270
Gaskill TR, Urbaniak JR, Aldridge JM III (2009) Free vascularized fibular transfer for femoral head osteonecrosis: donor and graft site morbidity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:1861–1867
Lee KS, Park JW (1999) Free vascularized osteocutaneous fibular graft to the tibia. Microsurgery 19:141–147
Goodacre TE, Walker CJ, Jawad AS, Jackson AM, Brough MD (1980) Donor site morbidity following osteocutaneous free fibula transfer. Br J Plast Surg 43:410–412
Ling XF, Peng X (2012) What is the price to pay for a free fibula flap? A systematic review of donor-site morbidity following free fibula flap surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 129(3):657–674
Shpitzer T, Neligan P, Boyd B, Gullane P, Gur E, Freeman J (1997) Leg morbidity and function following fibula free flap harvest. Ann Plast Surg 38:460–464
Hidalgo DA (1989) Free fibula flap: a new method of mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 84:71–79
Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG (2000) Mandible reconstruction with microvascular surgery. Semin Surg Oncol 19:226–234
Graham RG, Swan MC, Hudson DA, van Zyl JE (2003) The free fibula flap: advantages of the muscle sparing technique. Br J Plast Surg 56:388–394
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge guidance and support of Dr. Srinath Thakur, Principal, SDM College of dental sciences, Dharwad, in writing this paper. This work is credited to SDM Craniofacial Unit and Research Centre, SDM College of Dental Sciences & Hospital, a constituent unit of Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheswara University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maben, D., Anehosur, V. & Kumar, N. Assessment of Donor Site Morbidity Following Fibula Flap Transfer. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 20, 258–263 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-020-01337-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-020-01337-8