Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reconstruction of Acquired Frontal Bone Defects Using Titanium Mesh Implants: A Retrospective Study

  • Clinical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Frontal bone deformities can be acquired due to trauma or ablative tumor resection surgeries and osteomyelitis. It may also occur due to congenital malformations. Repair of these defects have long been a challenge to oral and maxillofacial surgeons. We report our experience in the reconstruction of acquired frontal bone defects by titanium mesh implant.

Patients and Methods

Titanium mesh was used for reconstruction in 35 patients (18–55 years age-group) (34 males and 01 females) of acquired frontal bone defects secondary to trauma (RTA). All these patients have been referred to author by Department of Neurosurgery of the institute of Affiliation.

Results

All these cases acquired defects as a result of trauma. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 18 months after the reconstruction. Patients were followed up for the progress of healing, stability of implants, infection, wound dehiscence, discharging sinus, exposure of implants, collections, patient satisfaction regarding esthetics and reaction to thermal changes. No postoperative complications were found.

Conclusion

In reconstruction of frontal bone defects, titanium mesh gives satisfactory results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haug RH, Adams JM, Conforti PJ, Likavek MJ (1994) Cranial fractures associated with facial fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52:729–733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zanotti B, Zingaretti N, Verlicchi A, Robiony M, Alfieri A, Parodi PC (2016) Cranioplasty: review of materials. J Craniofac Surg 27(8):2061–2072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams LR, Fan KF, Bentley RP (2015) Custom-made titanium cranioplasty: early and late complications of 151 cranioplasties and review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44(5):599–608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lin AY, Kinsella CR Jr, Rottgers SA, Smith DM, Grunwaldt LJ, Cooper GM, Losee JE (2012) Custom porous polyethylene implants for large-scale pediatric skull reconstruction: early outcomes. J Craniofac Surg 23(1):67–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Manson PN (1990) Facial injuries. In: McCarthy JG (ed) Plastic surgery. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 867–1141

    Google Scholar 

  6. McCarthy J, Zide BM (1984) The spectrum of calvarial bone grafting: introduction of the vascularized calvarial bone flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 74:10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hunter PD, Pelofsky S (1995) Classification of autogenous skull grafts in cranial reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Trauma 14:8–15

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen SR, Kawamoto HK (1992) Analysis and results of treatment of established pest traumatic facial deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 90(4):574–584

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Gool AY (1985) Preformed polymethyl methacrylate cranioplasties. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 13:2–8

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brown KE (1970) Fabrication of an alloplastic cranioimplant. J Prosthet Dent 24:213–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sabin H, Karvounis P (1969) The neurosurgeon-dentist team in cranioplasty. JADA 79:1183–1188

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Replogle RE, Lanzino G, Francel P (1996) Acrylic cranioplasty using miniplate struts. Neurosurgery 39:747–749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Galicich JH, Hovind KH (1967) Stainless steel mesh-acrylic cranioplasty technical note. J Neurosurg 27:376–378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Engstrand T, Kihlström L, Lundgren K, Trobos M, Engqvist H, Thomsen P (2015) Bioceramic implant induces bone healing of cranial defects. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3(8):e491

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Malis LI (1989) Titanium mesh and acrylic cranioplasty. Neurosurgery 25:351–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Patel MF, Langdon ID (1991) Titanium mesh osteosynthesis: a fast and adaptable method of semirigid fixation. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 29:316–324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Simpson D (1954) Titanium in cranioplasty. Br Med J 11(2):19–225

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mukherjee S, Thakur B, Haq I, Hettige S, Martin AJ (2014) Complications of titanium cranioplasty—a retrospective analysis of 174 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156(5):989–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hill CS, Luoma AM, Wilson SR, Kitchen N (2012) Titanium cranioplasty and the prediction of complications. Br J Neurosurg 26(6):832–837. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2012.692839

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Prof. (Col) P Suresh Menon, Department of Neurosurgery and Anesthesia. Dr S.N. Medical College Jodhpur.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chandrashekhar Chattopadhyay.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chattopadhyay, C. Reconstruction of Acquired Frontal Bone Defects Using Titanium Mesh Implants: A Retrospective Study. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 18, 34–39 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-018-1083-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-018-1083-6

Keywords

Navigation