Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fate of Costochondral Graft in Temporomandibular Joint Reconstruction: A Histological Study

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To asses the fate of the costochondral graft (CCG) used to stimulate mandibular growth in the management of Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) reconsrtuction in ankylosis—histologically.

Materials and Methods

Ten patients who had undergone CCG grafting for TMJ ankylosis between 1994–2009 in the department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Tamil Nadu Govt Dental College and Hospital, Chennai and had come back with reankylosis, were surgically explored and the graft along with the ankylotic mass was excised and evaluated histologically. There is no documented human study and clinically it is not possible.

Results

Histological evaluation revealed the presence of osseous tissue, fibrous tissue and osteocytes but no evidence of any chondroid tissue.

Conclusion

Our study showing the absence of chondroid tissue raises the question on the rationale of CCG in TMJ reconstruction when other interpositional gap arthroplasty can achieve a disease free joint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Kayat A, Bramley P (1979) A modified pre auricular approach to the temporomandibular joint and malar arch. Br J Oral Surg 17:91–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carlson DS, McNamara JA, Graber LW, Hoffma DL (1980) Experimental studies of growth and adaptation of TMJ. In: Irby WB (ed) Current advances in oral surgery, vol 3. CV Mosby co., St. Louis, pp 28–77

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ellis E, Carlson AS (1986) Histological comparison of the costochondral, sternoclavicular and Temporomandibular joints during growth in Macaca mulatta. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:312–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Figueroa AA, Gans BJ, Pruzansky S (1984) Longterm follow up of a mandibular costochondral graft. Oral Surg 58:257–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Guyuron B, Lasa CI (1992) Unpredictable growth pattern of costocondral graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 90:880–886

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaban Leonard B, Perrott David H, Fisher Keith (1990) A protocol for management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis. Oral Maxillofac Surg 48:1145–1151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kennett S (1973) Temporomandibular joint ankylosis: the rationale for grafting in the young patient. Oral Surg 31:744–748

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kent JN, Migiek DJ, Shen RK, Hindis EC, Harsy CA (1983) Temporomandibular joint condylar prosthesis: a 10 year report. Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:245–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. MacIntosh RB (1992) Current spectrum of costocondral graft. In: Bell WH (ed) Modern practice in orthognathic and reconstructive surgery, vol 2. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 873–894

    Google Scholar 

  10. MacIntosh RB, Henny FA (1977) Spectrum of application of autogenous costochondral grafts. Maxillofac Surg 5:257–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Matsura H, Miyamoto H, Ishimaru JJ, Kuntak Goss AW (2001) Costocondral grafts in recontruction of the temporomandibular joint after condylectomy: an experimental study in sheep. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Medra AMM (2005) Follow up of mandibular costochondral grafts after release of ankylosis of the Temporomandibular Joints. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:118–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. MerKx MA, Freihofer HP (1994) Fracture of CCG in TMJ: an unexpected complication. Oral Maxillofac Surg 24:142–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peltomaki T (1992) Growth of the costocondral Graft in the rat. TMJ Oral Maxillifac Surg 50:851–857

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Peltomäki T, Odont D (1994) Histologic structure of human costochondral junction. Plast Reconst Surg 94:585–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Perrot DH, Umela H, Kaban L (1994) Costchondral graft construction/reconstruction of the ramus/condyle unit: long term follow up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 23:321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Politis C, Fossion E, Bossuyt M (1987) The use of costochondral grafts in arthroplasty of the temporomandibular joint. Craniomaxillofac Surg 15:345–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ranstia A, Peruu H, Pyhtinen J, Oikarinen K (1996) Clinical and computed tomographic findings in the mandibular condyle. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54:1393–1400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wore W, Taylor RC (1944) Cartilagenous growth centre transplanted to replace mandibular condyle in Monkeys. J Oral Surg 23:244

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Prasad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prasad, C., Uma Maheswari, G. & Karthikeyan, D. Fate of Costochondral Graft in Temporomandibular Joint Reconstruction: A Histological Study. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 15, 179–183 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-015-0823-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-015-0823-0

Keywords

Navigation