Abstract
We present a new GIS-based fuzzy hierarchical MCDA for multiple assessments of land parcels in urban planning. In our model the criteria are decomposed in a hierarchical structure in which the leaf nodes are modelled with trapezoidal and triangular fuzzy sets on the universe of a specific characteristic of the parcel. The fuzzy set of a criterion is constructed as intersection of the fuzzy sets of the subcriteria in next hierarchical level that compose it. This approach has the advantage of managing complex evaluations of land parcels and facilitating the attribution of the degrees with which land parcels meet criteria. The proposed model has been experimented on a study area constituted by the municipality of Pozzuoli (Italy) in which the land parcels are the microzones in which the municipality is divided; we apply our method to assess which microzones are most suitable to increase the accommodation services of public primary school near them. Comparison of the results with expert assessments show that out method turns out to be reliable and consistent with the expert’s evaluations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdel-Basset M, Mohamed M, Sangaiah AK (2018) Neutrosophic AHP-Delphi Group decision making model based on trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 9:1427–1443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-017-0548-7
Akbulut A, Özçevik O, Carton L (2018) Evaluating suitability of a GIS-AHP combined method for sustainable Urban and environmental planning in Beykoz District, Istanbul. Int J Sustain Dev Plan 13(8):1103–1115. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V13-N8-1103-1115
Arefiev N, Terleev V, Badenko V (2015) GIS-based fuzzy method for urban planning. Proc Eng 117:39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.121
Chen J (2014) GIS-based multicriteria analysis for land use suitability assessment in city of Regina. Environ Syst Res 3:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-2697-3-13
Coutinho-Rodrigues J, Simão A, Henggeler Antunes C (2011) A GIS-based multicriteria spatial decision support system for planning urban infrastructures. Decis Support Syst 5(3):720–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2011.02.010
Dujmovic JJ, de Tré G (2011) Multicriteria methods and logic aggregation in suitability maps. Int J Intell Syst 26(10):971–1001. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.20509
Dujmovic JJ, de Tré G, Van de Weghe N (2010) LSP suitability maps. Soft Comput 14(5):421–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-009-0455-8
Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (2005) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer Science + Business Media Inc, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/b100605
Greco S, Ehrgott M, Figueira JR (eds) (2016) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. International series in operations research and management science, 2nd edn, vol 233. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4
Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications: a state-of-the-art survey. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
Jelokhani-Niaraki M, Malczewski J (2015) A group multicriteria spatial decision support system for parking site selection problem: a case study. Land Use Policy 402:92–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.09.003
Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decision analysis with multiple conflicting objectives. Wiley, New York (ISBN:978-0521438834)
Laarhoven P, Pedrycz W (1983) A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 11(1):199–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7
Lofti S, Habibi K, Koohsari MJ (2009) An analysis of urban land development using multi-criteria decision model and geographical information system (a case study of Babolsar City). Am J Environ Sci 5(1):87–93. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajes.2009.87.93
Malczewski J, Liu X (2014) Local ordered weighted averaging in GIS-based multicriteria analysis. Ann GIS 20:117–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2014.904439
Memarbashi E, Azadi H, Baradi AA, Mohajeri F, Van Passel S, Witlox F (2017) Land-use suitability in Northeast Iran: application of AHP-GIS hybrid model. ISPRS Int J Geo Inf 6(12):396. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6120396
Montgomery B, Dragićević S (2016) Comparison of GIS-based logic scoring of preference and multicriteria evaluation methods: urban land use suitability. Geogr Anal 48:427–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/gean.12103
Mosadeghi R, Warnken J, Tomlinson R, Mirfenderesk H (2016) Comparison of Fuzzy-AHP and AHP in a spatial multi-criteria decision-making model for urban land-use planning. Comput Environ Urban Syst 49:54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.10.001
Myagmartseren P, Buyandelger M, Anders Brandt S (2017) Implications of a spatial multicriteria decision analysis for urban development in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. Math Probl Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2819795
Rikalovic A, Cosic I, Lazarevic D (2013) GIS based multi-criteria analysis for industrial site selection. Proc Eng 69:1054–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.03.090
Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process: planning setting priorities, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill International, New York (ISBN: 978-0070543713)
Saaty TL (2005) Theory and applications of the analytic network process: decision making with benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (ISBN 1-888603-06-2)
Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2001) Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Kluwer Academic, Norwell. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3597-6
Sattarpour T, Nazarpour S, Golshannavaz S, Siano P (2018) A multi-objective hybrid GA and TOPSIS approach for sizing and siting of DG and RTU in smart distribution grids. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 9:105–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-01808-3
Soltani A, Hewage K, Reza Sadiq R (2015) Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of municipal solid waste management: a review. Waste Manag 35:318–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.010
Stewart TJ, Janssen R (2014) A multiobjective GIS-based land use planning algorithm. Comput Environ Urban Syst 46:25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.04.002
Triantaphyllou E (2000) Multi-criteria decision making: a comparative study. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (ISBN:0-7923-6607-7)
Yager RR (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 18(1):183–190. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.87068
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the staff of the Urban Planning Government of the Territory of the Municipality of Pozzuoli, and its manager, Arch. Agostino Di Lorenzo, for their support and the provision of all the data available at the Municipality used in the research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
In this research the authors have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cardone, B., Di Martino, F. GIS-based hierarchical fuzzy multicriteria decision-making method for urban planning. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 12, 601–615 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02043-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02043-6