Skip to main content
Log in

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Experimental study of cavitation criterion in centrifugal pumps

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Visualization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article was retracted on 13 October 2013

Abstract

Pumps are designed and manufactured to operate far from the cavitation condition. Pump designers define the cavitation inception point as the point where the head drops by 3 %. This definition is incorrect, because the first appearance of vapour bubbles is observed earlier than 3 % drop in the head. Therefore, using 3 % drop in head, as indication parameter for cavitation inception has always resulted in damage in pumps during operation. This paper describes visual studies conducted to determine the variation of net positive suction head with flow rate, rotational speed and water temperature. The experiments showed that the visual incipient of cavitation in the pump was existed long before drop in pump head occurs. A special correlation between the visual inception cavitation net positive suction head and net positive suction head corresponding to 3 % drop in head was developed at various operating conditions.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

H:

Pump head

NPSH:

Net positive suction head (eqn 1)

NPSHiv :

Visual inception net positive suction head

NPSH3% :

Net positive suction head corresponding to 3 % head drop

Q:

Flow rate

Qopt :

Optimum flow rate

T:

Temperature  °C

References

  • Alfayez L, Saudi DG, Dyson, Browne D (2004) “Detection of incipient cavitation and the best efficiency point of a 2.2 MW centrifugal pump using acoustic emission”. In: Proceedings of 26th European Conference on Acoustic Emission Testing, pp 15–17, Berlin

  • El-kadi MA (2001) “Cavitation in centrifugal pumps handling hot water”. Eng Res J, Helwan University, 77:200–216, Egypt

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi R, Dupont PH, Avellan F, Favre JN, Guelich JF, Parkinson E (1998) Centrifugal performance drop due to leading edge cavitation: numerical prediction compared with model rests. J Fluids Eng 120:705–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann M, Stoffel B Friedrichs J, Kosyna G (2001) “Similarities and geometrical effects on rotating cavitation in two scaled centrifugal 3 pumps”. Proc 4th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV’01), Pasadena, California, USA

  • McNulty PJ, Pearsall IS (1982) “Cavitation inception in pumps”. J Fluids Eng

  • Sloteman DP (2007) “Cavitation in high energy pumps—detection and assessment of damage potential”. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Pump Users Symposium, pp 29–38

  • Wulff DL (2006) “Unsteady pressure and velocity measurements in pumps”. Education Notes RTO-EN-AVT-143, pp 1–34, Germany

  • Yamaguchi H, Kato H (1983) “On application of nonlinear cavity flow theory to thick foil sections”, Proc 2nd Conf Cavitation, IMechE, Edinburgh, pp 167–174

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Hosien.

Additional information

The article has been retracted by the Editor-in-Chief due to wide redundancy, both in text as well as figures and photographs, with the previously published article "Detection of Cavitation in Centrifugal Pumps" by A.A.B. Al-Arabi et al., Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(10): 1260-1267, 2011. The authors were asked for a statement but did not respond.

Appendix A

Appendix A

See Tables 4 and 5

Table 4 Experimental values of NPSH corresponding to 3 % drop in head
Table 5 Experimental values of visual inception NPSHiv

About this article

Cite this article

Hosien, M.A., Selim, S.M. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Experimental study of cavitation criterion in centrifugal pumps. J Vis 16, 99–110 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-012-0149-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-012-0149-7

Keywords

Navigation