Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Role of Enzyme Loading on Starch and Cellulose Hydrolysis of Food Waste

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Waste and Biomass Valorization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Sugars production from secondary resources has been recognised as a strategic process unit within the valorisation routes of waste. In this context, food waste (FW) as an abundant waste stream with elevated concentrations of glucose and carbohydrates (cellulose, starch) could stand as a suitable feedstock for saccharification. To evaluate this new potential application of FW, FW enzymatic hydrolysis was investigated via non-commercial enzymes.

Methods

FW was subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis by an amylolytic and a cellulolytic formulation under different enzyme loadings. At the optimum conditions, the time course of glucose production during enzymatic hydrolysis was also studied. In order to enlighten the viability of bioethanol production process from FW, the experimental results were evaluated in terms of cost of enzymes per liter of bioethanol produced.

Results

81% starch hydrolysis was achieved after 1 h of hydrolysis by 45 μL amylolytic enzyme NS22109/g starch at 65 °C. With regard to the effect of cellulase loading, 175 μL NS22177/g cellulose achieved 50% saccharification yield. Further increase of enzyme dosage just slightly increased the yield. More specifically, by increasing the enzyme loading 540%, the resulting saccharification efficiency increased by just 16%. Last, the enzyme cost per ethanol yield was almost 3.5 times lower when just amylolytic enzymes were used for similar ethanol yields.

Conclusion

Enzymatic hydrolysis of starch and cellulose present in FW proved to be technically efficient providing high yields. Nevertheless, the difference in the economic weight of the use of amylolytic and/or cellulolytic enzymes strongly influences the viability of FW valorization via bioethanol production.

Graphic Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EU:

European Union

FW:

Food waste

GOX–PER:

Glucose oxidase–peroxidase

MSW:

Municipal solid waste

RSM:

Response surface methodology

UEST:

Unit of Environmental Science and Technology

GHG:

Greenhouse gas

References

  1. Fatmawati, A., Gunawan, K.Y., Hadiwijaya, F.A.: Hydrolysis of alkaline pretreated banana peel. Mater. Sci. Eng. Conf. Ser. 273(1), 012011 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/245/1/012011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Moon, H.C., Song, I.S., Kim, J.C., Shirai, Y., Lee, D.H., Kim, J.K., Chung, S.O., Kim, D.H., Oh, K.K., Cho, Y.S.: Enzymatic hydrolysis of food waste and ethanol fermentation. Int. J. Energy Res. 33(2), 164–172 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carmona-Cabello, M., Garcia, I.L., Leiva-Candia, D., Dorado, M.P.: Valorization of food waste based on its composition through the concept of biorefinery. Curr. Opin. Green. Sustain. Chem. 14, 67–79 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ravindran, R., Jaiswal, A.K.: Exploitation of food industry waste for high-value products. Trends Biotechnol. 34(1), 58–69 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kumar, V., Longhurst, P.: Recycling of food waste into chemical building blocks. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 13, 118–122 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pleissner, D., Lin, C.S.K.: Valorisation of food waste in biotechnological processes. Sustain. Chem. Processes 1, 1–6 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cekmecelioglu, D., Uncu, O.N.: Kinetic modeling of enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated kitchen wastes for enhancing bioethanol production. Waste Manag. 33(3), 735–739 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hafid, H.S., Abdul Rahman, N., Md Shah, U.K., Samsu Baharudin, A., Zakaria, R.: Direct utilization of kitchen waste for bioethanol production by separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) using locally isolated yeast. Int. J. Green Energy 13(3), 248–259 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hafid, H.S., Nor’Aini, A.R., Mokhtar, M.N., Talib, A.T., Baharuddin, A.S., Umi Kalsom, M.S.: Over production of fermentable sugar for bioethanol production from carbohydrate-rich malaysian food waste via sequential acid-enzymatic hydrolysis pretreatment. Waste Manag. 67, 95–105 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ntaikou, I., Menis, N., Alexandropoulou, M., Antonopoulou, G., Lyberatos, G.: Valorization of kitchen biowaste for ethanol production via simultaneous saccharification and fermentation using co-cultures of the yeasts saccharomyces cerevisiae and pichia stipitis. Bioresour. Technol. 263, 75–83 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tang, Y.Q., Koike, Y., Liu, K., An, M.Z., Morimura, S., Wu, X.L., Kida, K.: Ethanol production from kitchen waste using the flocculating yeast saccharomyces cerevisiae strain KF-7. Biomass Bioenergy 32(11), 1037–1045 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Uçkun Kiran, E., Liu, Y.: Bioethanol production from mixed food waste by an effective enzymatic pretreatment. Fuel 159, 463–469 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Anwar Saeed, M., Ma, H., Yue, S., Wang, Q., Tu, M.: Concise review on ethanol production from food waste: development and sustainability. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25(29), 28851–28863 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sluiter, A., Hames, B., Ruiz, R., Scarlata, C., Sluiter, J., Templeton, D., Crocker, D.: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (U.S.) Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass laboratory analytical procedure (LAP): issue date, 4/25/2008. Golden, Colo: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2008)

  15. Xiao, Z., Storms, R., Tsang, A.: A quantitative starch-iodine method for measuring alpha-amylase and glucoamylase activities. Anal. Biochem. 351(1), 146–148 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ghose, T.K.: Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl. Chem. 59(2), 257–268 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sarkar, N., Ghosh, S.K., Bannerjee, S., Aikat, K.: Bioethanol production from agricultural wastes: an overview. Renew. Energy 37(1), 19–27 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yan, S., Wang, P., Zhai, Z., Yao, J.: Fuel ethanol production from concentrated food waste hydrolysates in immobilized cell reactors by saccharomyces cerevisiae H058. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 86(5), 731–738 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yan, S., Yao, J., Yao, L., Zhi, Z., Chen, X., Wu, J.: Fed batch enzymatic saccharification of food waste improves the sugar concentration in the hydrolysates and eventually the ethanol fermentation by saccharomyces cerevisiae H058. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 55(2), 183–192 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mahmoodi, P., Karimi, K., Taherzadeh, M.J.: Hydrothermal processing as pretreatment for efficient production of ethanol and biogas from municipal solid waste. Bioresour. Technol. 261, 166–175 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Koike, Y., An, M.Z., Tang, Y.Q., Syo, T., Osaka, N., Morimura, S., Kida, K.: Production of fuel ethanol and methane from garbage by high-efficiency two-stage fermentation process. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 108(6), 508–512 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim, J.H., Lee, J.C., Pak, D.: Feasibility of producing ethanol from food waste. Waste Manag. 31(9–10), 2121–2125 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Banerjee, S., Mudliar, S., Sen, R., Giri, B., Satpute, D., Chakrabarti, T., Pandey, R.A.: Commercializing lignocellulosic bioethanol: technology bottlenecks and possible remedies. Biofuel Bioprod. Biorefin. 4(1), 77–93 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pandiyan, K., Singh, A., Singh, S., Saxena, A.K., Nain, L.: Technological interventions for utilization of crop residues and weedy biomass for second generation bio-ethanol production. Renew. Energy 132, 723–741 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gomes, D.G., Serna-Loaiza, S., Cardona, C.A., Gama, M., Domingues, L.: Insights into the economic viability of cellulases recycling on bioethanol production from recycled paper sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 267, 347–355 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Battista, F., Bolzonella, D.: Some critical aspects of the enzymatic hydrolysis at high dry-matter content: a review. Biofuel. Bioprod. Biorefin. 12(4), 711–723 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chovau, S., Degrauwe, D., Van Der Bruggen, B.: Critical analysis of techno-economic estimates for the production cost of lignocellulosic bio-ethanol. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 26, 307–321 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Loizidou.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salimi, E., Saragas, K., Taheri, M.E. et al. The Role of Enzyme Loading on Starch and Cellulose Hydrolysis of Food Waste. Waste Biomass Valor 10, 3753–3762 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-019-00826-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-019-00826-3

Keywords

Navigation