Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Bioconversion of Residue Biomass from a Tropical Homestead Agro-Ecosystem to Value Added Vermicompost by Eudrilus Species of Earthworm

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Waste and Biomass Valorization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Homestead farming systems generate in addition to the economic produce, huge quantities of diverse agro-wastes, which are resources containing significant levels of plant nutrients and organic carbon. This biomass resource is either grossly underutilized or completely unutilized, posing disposal or environmental problems. To utilize these organic wastes effectively, a study was undertaken on bioconversion of residue biomass with different characteristics to value added vermicompost for use in crop production.

Methods

Physico-chemical characteristics of residue biomass were determined. Vermicomposting experiment was carried out with residue biomass from 14 crops/trees taken individually and cow dung in the ratio of 10:1 using an indigenous epigeic earthworm belonging to Eudrilus species. Quality and maturity parameters of vermicompost obtained were assessed.

Results

The bioconversion efficiency and the earthworm multiplication varied significantly among the residue biomass of different crops/trees. The biomass materials from banana, arecanut palm, coconut palm, rubber, teak, and cassava plants as well as weeds were vermicomposted with a conversion efficiency of > 60%. During the vermi-stabilization process, carbon loss was < 20% from the residues of rubber and mango and > 50% from residues of teak, banana, wild jack fruit tree, coconut palm and cocoa. Bioconversion resulted in an increase in pH, electrical conductivity and major plant nutrients (N, P) while C:N and C:P ratios decreased in all crop residues. Significant relationship between major plant nutrients in crop residues with maturity parameters of vermicompost was demonstrated.

Conclusion

Vermi-stabilization holds promise as a biological tool for management of residues of crops/trees in homestead farming system. However, certain residues were not efficiently converted to vermicompost and might require pretreatments or mixing of residues to achieve higher efficiency of bioconversion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Matson, P.A., Parton, W.J., Power, A.G., Swift, M.J.: Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science. 277(5325), 504–509 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Smil, V.: Crop residues: agriculture’s largest harvest. BioSci. 49, 299–308 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sidhu, A.S., Sekhon, N.K., Thind, S.S., Hira, G.S.: Residue management for sustainable crop production in summer moong–maize–wheat sequence. J. Sust. Agric. 22(2), 43–54 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Adi, A.J., Noor, Z.M.: Waste recycling: utilization of coffee grounds and kitchen waste in vermicomposting. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 1027–1030 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alvarenga, P., Clarisse, M., Farto, M., Palma, P., Sengo, J., Morais, M.-C., Cunha-Queda, C.: Quality assessment of a battery of organic wastes and composts using maturity, stability and enzymatic parameters. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 7, 455–465 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Harris, G.D., Platt, W.L., Price, B.C.: Vermicomposting in a rural community. BioCycle. 31(1), 48–51 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Logsdon, G.: Worldwide progress in vermicomposting. BioCycle. 35(10), 63–65 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Prabhu, S.R., Subramanian, P., Biddappa, C.C., Bopaiah, B.M.: Prospects of improving coconut productivity through vermiculture technologies. Indian Coconut J. 29, 79–84 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gopal, M., Gupta, A., Thomas, G.V.: Opportunity to sustain coconut ecosystem service through recycling of the palms leaf litter as vermicompost: Indian Scenario. Coconut Res. Dev. (CORD). 26(2), 42–55 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thomas, G.V., Palaniswami, C., Gopal, M., Gupta, A.: Recycling coconut leaf-agro wastes mixture using Eudrilus sp. and growth promotion properties of coconut leaf vermicompost. Int. J. Innov. Hort. 1(2), 113–118 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chatterjee, R., Bandyopadhyay, S., Jana, J.C.: Evaluation of vegetable wastes recycled for vermicomposting and its response on yield and quality of carrot (Daucus carota L.)., Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-014-0060-4

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fernandes, E.C.M., Nair, P.K.R.: An evaluation of the structure and function of tropical home gardens. Agric. Syst. 21, 279–310 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jacob, J., Joy, M.: Integrated approach towards coconut-based farming systems. In: Thampan, P. K., Vasu, K. I. (eds.) Coconut for rural welfare, pp. 109–116. Asian and Pacific Coconut Community, Jakarta (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Swaminathan, M.S.: The promise of agro-forestry for ecological and nutritional security. In: Steppler, H. A., Nair, P. K. R. (eds.) Agroforestry: a decade of development, pp. 25–41. International Centre for Research on Agroforestry (ICRAF), Nairobi (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Peter, K.V., Prasada Rao, G.S.L.V.: Homestead farming in the warm humid. Kerala Calling 2005, 30–35 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Walkley, A., Black, I.A.: An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 37, 29–37 (1934)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kjeldahl, J.: A new method for the estimation of nitrogen in organic compounds. Z Anal. Chem. 22, 366 (1883)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bray, R.H., Kurtz, L.T.: Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci. 59, 39–45 (1945)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hanway, J.J., Heidel, H.: Soil analysis method as used in Iowa state college soil testing laboratory. Iowa State Coll. Agric. 57, 1–31 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zucconi, F., Pera, A., Forte, M., de Bertoldi, M.: Evaluating toxicity of immature compost. BioCycle. 22, 54–57 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Suthar, S.: Nutrient changes and biodynamics of epigeic earthworm during recycling of some agricultural wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 98, 1608–1614 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Haimi, J., Huhta, V.: Comparison of composts produced from identical wastes by vermistabilization and conventional composting. Pedobiology. 30(2), 137–144 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fares, F., Albalkhi, A., Dec, J., Bruns, M.A., Bollag, J.M.: Physicochemical characteristics of animal and municipal wastes decomposed in arid soils. J. Environ. Qual. 34(4), 1392–1403 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sharma, S.: Municipal solid waste management through vermicomposting employing exotic and local species of earthworms. Bioresour. Technol. 90(2), 169–173 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jadia, C.D., Fulekar, M.H.: Vermicomposting of vegetable waste: a bio-physicochemical process based on hydro-operating bioreactor. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 7(20), 3723–3730 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Raghavendra, M.A., Bano, K.: Studies on the manorial value of vermicompost from different green leaves. Curr. Res. 30(3/4), 35–37 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kale, R.D.: Earthworms: nature’s gift for utilization of organic waste. In: Edwards, C.A. (ed.) Earthworm ecology. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dominguez, J.: State-of-the-art and new perspectives on vermicomposting research. In: Edwards, C.A. (ed.) Earthworm ecology, 2nd ed., pp. 401–424. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Bernal, M.P., Alburquerque, J.A., Moral, R.: Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment—a review. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 5444–5453 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bansal, S., Kapoor, K.K.: Vermicomposting of crop residues and cattle dung with Eisenia foetida. Bioresour. Technol. 73(2), 95–98 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chauhan, A., Joshi, P.C.: Composting of some dangerous and toxic weeds using Eisenia fetida. J. Am. Sci. 6, 1–6 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tognetti, C., Mazzarino, M.J., Laos, F.: Composting biosolids and municipal organic waste: effects of process management on stabilization and quality. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 43, 387–397 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ghosh, G.N., Chattopadhyay, K., Bara, l.: Transformation of phosphorus during vermicomposting. Bioresour. Technol. 69, 149–154 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Manyuchi, M.M., Phiri, A., Muredzi, P., Chitambwe, T.: Comparison of vermicompost and vermiwash bio-fertilizers from vermicomposting waste corn pulp. Int. J. Biol. Biomol. Agric. Food Biotechnol. Eng. 7(6), 389–392 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Blouin, M., Hodson, M.E., Delgado, E.A., Baker, G., Brussaard, L., Butt, K.R., Dai, J., Dendooven, L., Peres, G., Tondoh, J.E., Cluzeau, D., Brun, J.J.: A review of earthworm impact on soil function and ecosystem services. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 64, 161–182 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jouquet, E.P., Bloquel, E., Thu, D.T., Ricoy, M., Orange, D., Rumpel, C., Tran, D.T.: Do compost and vermicompost improve macronutrient retention and plant growth in degraded tropical soils? Compost. Sci. Util. 19, 15–24 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Degefe, G., Mengistou, S., Mohammed, S.: Physico chemical evaluation of coffee husk, wastes of enset (Enset ventricosum), vegetable and khat (Catha edulis) through vermicomposting employing an epigeic earthworm Dendrobaena veneta (Rosa, 1886). Afr. J. Biotechnol. 15(20), 884–890 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Suthar, S., Singh, S.: Vermicomposting of domestic waste by using two epigeic earthworms (Perionyx excavatus and Perionyx sansibaricus. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 5(1), 99–106 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ananthakrishnasamy, S., Gunasekaran, S., Manimegala, G.: Fly ash-lignite waste management through vermicomposting by indigenous earthworms Lampito mauritii. Am. Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 5, 720–724 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Song, X., Liu, M., Wu, D., Griffiths, B.S., Jiao, J., Li, H., Hu, F.: Interaction matters: synergy between vermicompost and PGPR agents improves soil quality, crop quality and crop yield in the field. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 89, 25–34 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Edward, C.A.: The use of earthworms in the breakdown and management of organic wastes. In: Edward, C.A. (ed.) Earthworm ecology, pp. 327–354. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  42. CCQC: Compost maturity index. California Compost Quality Council, Nevada City (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Morais, F.M.C., Queda, C.A.C.: Study of storage influence on evaluation of stability and maturity properties of MSW compost. In Advances for a sustainable Society Part II: proceedings of the fourth international conference of ORBIT association on biological processing of organics, Perth, Australia, 2003

  44. Hand, P., Hayes, W.A., Frankland, J.C., Satchell, J.E.: The vermicomposting of cow slurry. Pedobiology. 3, 199–209 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Yan, C.H., Ahmed, O.H., Kassim, S., Majid, N.M.A.: Co-composting of pineapple leaves and chicken manure slurry. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric. 2, 23–31 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Arancon, N., Pant, A., Radovich, T.J.K., Potter, J.K. and. Converse, C.E.: Seed germination and seedling growth of tomato and lettuce as affected by vermicompost water extracts (teas). HortScience. 47(12), 1722–1728 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Edwards, C.A., Arancon, N.Q., Greytak, S.: Effects of vermicompost teas on plant growth and disease. Biocycle. 47, 28–31 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gopal, M., Gupta, A., Sunil, E., Thomas, G.V.: Amplification of plant beneficial microbial communities during conversion of coconut leaf substrate to vermicompost by Eudrilus sp. Curr. Microbiol. 59, 15–20 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Savy, D., Cozzolino, V., Vinci, G., Nebbioso, A., Piccolo, A.: Water-soluble lignins from different bioenergy crops stimulate the early development of maize (Zea mays L.). Molecules. 20, 19958–19970 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Savy, D., Cozzolino, V., Antonio, N., Drosos, M., Nuzzo, A., Mazzei, P., Piccolo, A.: Humic-like bioactivity on emergence and early growth of maize (Zea mays L.) of water-soluble lignins isolated from biomass for energy. Plant Soil. 402, 221–233 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Kerala State Council for Science, Technology and Environment, Government of Kerala for funding the Emeritus Scientist Scheme on “Bioconversion of residues from major crops of Kerala and food processing to value added organic resource for sustainable farming” in which this work was carried out. We are grateful to the Director, Council for Food Research and Development, Konni, Kerala for providing facilities to carry out this work. We also thank Mr. C. H. Amarnath, Formerly Technical Officer, ICAR-CPCRI Kasaragod for statistical analysis of the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Council for Food Research and Development, Perinjottakkal P.O., Konni, Kerala, 689692, India

    George V. Thomas, Ancy E. Mathew, Grace Baby & M. K. Mukundan

Authors
  1. George V. Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ancy E. Mathew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Grace Baby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. K. Mukundan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George V. Thomas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thomas, G.V., Mathew, A.E., Baby, G. et al. Bioconversion of Residue Biomass from a Tropical Homestead Agro-Ecosystem to Value Added Vermicompost by Eudrilus Species of Earthworm. Waste Biomass Valor 10, 1821–1831 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0203-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0203-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation