Abstract
Dark fermentative hydrogen gas production from waste peach pulp was studied without external microbial culture inoculation. First, most suitable pulp concentration for hydrogen production was determined in bench scale serum bottles then a 140 L pilot scale reactor was operated at most convenient pulp concentration. During the bench scale experiments the pulp concentration was varied between 3.42 and 170.80 g TS/L and the highest cumulative hydrogen volumes were obtained at 102.5 and 170.8 g TS/L, respectively. The initial pulp concentration of 34.16 g TS/L showed the best performance in terms of hydrogen formation yield (180 mL H2/g COD) and rate (6.44 mL H2/h). Hydrogen yield and rate increased up to 34.16 g TS/L due to substrate limitation. However, higher pulp concentrations resulted in substrate inhibition. This result was in accordance with the kinetic analysis where the substrate inhibition constant was determined as 43.86 g TS/L. The pilot scale reactor operated at optimum 34.16 g TS/L pulp concentration resulted in 323.67 mL H2/g COD and 3900 mL H2/h hydrogen formation, respectively. Our results demonstrated that waste peach pulp could be used both as substrate and inoculum source for hydrogen gas production when the initial substrate concentration is adjusted properly.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Das, D., Veziroglu, T.: Advances in biological hydrogen production processes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 33(21), 6046–6057 (2008)
Valdez-Vazquez, I., Poggi-Varaldo, H.M.: Hydrogen production by fermentative consortia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13, 1000–1013 (2009)
Gavrilescu, D.: Energy from biomass in pulp and paper. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 7, 537–546 (2008)
Piera, M., Martínez-Val, J.M., José Montes, M.: Safety issues of nuclear production of hydrogen. Energy Convers. Manag. 47, 2732–2739 (2006).
Şengül, E., Erdener, H., Akay, R.G., Yücel, H., Baç, N., Eroǧlu, I.: Effects of sulfonated polyether-etherketone (SPEEK) and composite membranes on the proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) performance. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 34, 4645–4652 (2009)
Bayrakceken, A., Smirnova, A., Kitkamthorn, U., Aindow, M., Turker, L., Eroglu, I., Erkey, C.: Pt-based electrocatalysts for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells prepared by supercritical deposition technique. J. Power Sources. 179, 532–540 (2008)
Li, C., Fang, H.H.P.: Fermentative hydrogen production from wastewater and solid wastes by mixed cultures. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37, 1–39 (2007)
Ozmihci, S., Kargi, F.: Dark fermentative bio-hydrogen production from waste wheat starch using co-culture with periodic feeding: Effects of substrate loading rate. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 36, 7089–7093 (2011)
Kim, M., Oh, S., Rakwal, R., Liu, C., Zhang, Z.: Simultaneous organic solids disintegration and fermentative hydrogen production by pretreated sludge generated from wastewater treatment plant. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev. 4, 617–623 (2013)
Argun, H., Dao, S.: Hydrogen gas production from waste peach pulp by dark fermentation and electrohydrolysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 41, 11568–11576 (2016)
Kim, D.-H., Kim, S.-H., Shin, H.-S.: Hydrogen fermentation of food waste without inoculum addition. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 45, 181–187 (2009)
Marone, A., Izzo, G., Mentuccia, L., Massini, G., Paganin, P., Rosa, S., Varrone, C., Signorini, A.: Vegetable waste as substrate and source of suitable microflora for bio-hydrogen production. Renew. Energy. 68, 6–13 (2014)
Gupta, S.K., Kumari, S., Reddy, K., Bux, F.: Trends in biohydrogen production: major challenges and state-of-the-art developments. Environ. Technol. 34, 1653–1670 (2013)
Azbar, N., Levin, D.B.: State of the Art and Progress in Production of Biohydrogen. Bentham Science Publishers, Dubai (2012)
Tapia-Venegas, E., Ramirez-Morales, J.E., Silva-Illanes, F., Toledo-Alarcón, J., Paillet, F., Escudie, R., Lay, C.H., Chu, C.Y., Leu, H.J., Marone, A., Lin, C.Y., Kim, D.H., Trably, E., Ruiz-Filippi, G.: Biohydrogen production by dark fermentation: scaling-up and technologies integration for a sustainable system. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 14, 761–785 (2015)
Singh, A., Rathore, D. (eds.): Biohydrogen Production: Sustainability of Current Technology and Future Perspective. Springer, New Delhi (2017).
Kumar, G., Bakonyi, P., Periyasamy, S., Kim, S.H., Nemestóthy, N., Bélafi-Bakó, K.: Lignocellulose biohydrogen: practical challenges and recent progress. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 44, 728–737 (2015)
Nanqi, R., Wanqian, G., Bingfeng, L., Guangli, C., Jie, D.: Biological hydrogen production by dark fermentation: challenges and prospects towards scaled-up production. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 22, 365–370 (2011)
Shah, A.T., Favaro, L., Alibardi, L., Cagnin, L., Sandon, A., Cossu, R., Casella, S., Basaglia, M.: Bacillus sp. strains to produce bio-hydrogen from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Appl. Energy. 176, 116–124 (2016)
Soltan, M., Elsamadony, M., Tawfik, A.: Biological hydrogen promotion via integrated fermentation of complex agro-industrial wastes. Appl. Energy. 185, 929–938 (2017)
Xia, A., Cheng, J., Ding, L., Lin, R., Song, W., Su, H., Zhou, J., Cen, K.: Substrate consumption and hydrogen production via co-fermentation of monomers derived from carbohydrates and proteins in biomass wastes. Appl. Energy. 139, 9–16 (2015)
Zhang, Y., Zhang, F., Chen, M., Chu, P., Ding, J., Zeng, R.J.: Hydrogen supersaturation in extreme-thermophilic (70 °C) mixed culture fermentation. Appl. Energy. 109, 213–219 (2013)
Fuess, L.T., Mazine Kiyuna, L.S., Garcia, M.L., Zaiat, M.: Operational strategies for long-term biohydrogen production from sugarcane stillage in a continuous acidogenic packed-bed reactor. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 41, 8132–8145 (2015)
Kim, D.H., Kim, S.H., Kim, H.W., Kim, M.S., Shin, H.S.: Sewage sludge addition to food waste synergistically enhances hydrogen fermentation performance. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 8501–8506 (2011)
Marone, A., Massini, G., Patriarca, C., Signorini, A., Varrone, C., Izzo, G.: Hydrogen production from vegetable waste by bioaugmentation of indigenous fermentative communities. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 37, 5612–5622 (2012)
Jain, A.: Biohydrogen production from cull peach medium by hydperthermophilic bacterium Thermotoga neapolitana. http://tigerprints.clemson.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1653&context=all_theses, (2009)
DuBois, M., Gilles, K.A., Hamilton, J.K., Rebers, P.A., Smith, F.: Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 28, 350–356 (1956)
Rice, E.W., Baird, R.B., Eaton, A.D.: L.S.C.: Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Am. Water Work. Assoc. Public Work. Assoc. Environ. Fed. 1469 (2012)
Logan, B.E., Oh, S.E., Kim, I.S., Van Ginkel, S.: Biological hydrogen production measured in batch anaerobic respirometers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 2530–2535 (2002)
Lee, K., Hsu, Y., Lo, Y., Lin, P., Lin, C., Chang, J.: Exploring optimal environmental factors for fermentative hydrogen production from starch using mixed anaerobic microflora. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 33, 1565–1572 (2008)
Argun, H., Kargi, F., Kapdan, I.K., Oztekin, R.: Batch dark fermentation of powdered wheat starch to hydrogen gas: effects of the initial substrate and biomass concentrations. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 33, 6109–6115 (2008)
Hallenbeck, P.C.: Fundamentals of biohydrogen. In: Pandey, A., Chang, J.S., Hallenbeck, P.C., and Larroche, C. (eds.) Biohydrogen, pp. 25–43. Elsevier, San Diego (2013)
Guo, X.M., Trably, E., Latrille, E., Carrère, H., Steyer, J.-P.: Hydrogen production from agricultural waste by dark fermentation: a review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 35, 10660–10673 (2010)
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Turkish Scientific Research Council (TUBİTAK) with a Grant Number 113M994.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
All rights of the findings of this study are reserved by a patent application by Dr. H. Argun.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Argun, H., Dao, S. Hydrogen Gas Production from Waste Peach Pulp by Natural Microflora. Waste Biomass Valor 9, 2117–2124 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-9990-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-9990-1