Abstract
We study a two-species totally asymmetric exclusion process (TASEP) in 1D lattice in which the particles of both species move stochastically in opposite directions (with rate v) and switch directions stochastically (with rate \(\alpha \)) while adjacent a particle of either species. We focus on the cluster size distribution P(m), where a cluster is taken to be a contiguous set of sites occupied by either species, as a function of \(Q=v/\alpha \). For a total density \(\rho \) of particles, in the limit \(Q \rightarrow 0\), the cluster size distribution is shown to be \(P(m) = \left( 1/\rho - 1\right) e^{-m/\ln \rho }\) and the mean cluster size \(\langle m \rangle = 1/(1-\rho )\), results which are independent of Q and are identical to those for the simple exclusion process. By contrast, in the opposite limit, \(Q\gg 1\), we find the average cluster size, \(\langle m \rangle \propto Q^{1/2}\)—similar to the that for the persistent exclusion process (PEP), although the cluster size distributions are different in both limits. We further find that, for a finite system with L sites, the probability distribution of cluster sizes exhibits a distinct peak which corresponds to the formation of a single cluster of size \(m_{\rm{s}} = \rho L\). However, this peak vanishes in the thermodynamic limit \( L \rightarrow \infty \). Interestingly, the probability of this largest size cluster, \(P(m_{\rm{s}})\), for different \(L, \rho \) and Q exhibits data collapse in terms of the scaled variable \(Q_{\rm{s}}\equiv Q/L^2 \rho (1-\rho )\). The statistical features of the clustering observed for this minimal model may be relevant for active particle systems in 1D.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
G M Schutz J. Phys. A 36 R339 (2003)
M R Evans, D P Foster, C Godreche and D Mukamel Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 208 (1995)
M R Evans and T Hanney J. Phys. A 38 R195 (2005)
M R Evans, Y Kafri, H M Koduvely and D Mukamel Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 425 (1998)
S Muhuri EPL 106 28001 (2014)
Y Kafri, E Levine, D Mukamel, G M Schutz and J Torok Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 035702 (2002)
T Midha, A B Kolomeisky and A K Gupta J. Stat. Mech. 043205 (2018)
M E Cates and J Tailleur Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6 219 (2015)
A Parmegianni, T Franosch and E Frey Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 086601 (2003)
S Muhuri and I Pagonabarraga Phys. Rev. E 82 021925 (2010)
Y Aghababaie, G I Menon and M Plischke Phys. Rev. E 59 2578 (1999)
S Muhuri and I Pagonabarraga J. Stat. Mech. (Theo. and Exp.) P11011 (2011)
T Chou, K Mallick, R K P Zia Rep. Prog. Phys. 74 116601 (2011)
S Muhuri, L Shagolsem and M Rao Phys. Rev. E 84 031921 (2011)
K E P Sugden, M R Evans, W C K Poon and N D Read Phys. Rev. E 75 031909 (2007)
S Muhuri EPL 101 38001 (2013)
B Shinde, S Khan and S Muhuri Phys. Rev. Res. 2 023111 (2020)
P Castro, F M Rocha, S Diles, R Soto and P Sollich Soft Matter 17 9926 (2021)
R Soto and R Golestanian Phys. Rev. E 89 0127706 (2014)
M A Welte Curr. Biol. 14 R525 (2004)
R L Morris and P J Hollenbeck J. Cell. Sc. 104 917 (1993)
M J I Müller, S Klumpp and R Lipowsky Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 105 4609 (2008)
P Puri, N Gupta, S Naskar, A Nair, S Chandel, A Chaudhuri, M K Mitra and S Muhuri Phys. Rev. Res. 1 023019 (2019)
P Illien, C Blois, Y Liu, M Linden and O Dauchot Phys. Rev. E 101 040602(R) (2020)
T Bertrand, J d’Alessandro, A Maitra, B Mercier, R-M Mège, B Ladoux and R Voituriez arXiv:2012.00785 (2020)
A Alert and X Trepat Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11 77 (2020)
A Roycroft and R Mayor Trends in Cell Biol. 25 373 (2015)
M A Fernandez-Rodriguez, F Grillo, L Alvarez, M Rathlef, I Buttinoni, G Volpe and L Isa Nat. Commun. 11 4223 (2020)
B Afra, S Karimnejad, A A Delouei and A Tarokh Ocean. Eng. 250 111025 (2022)
B Afra, A A Delouei and A Tarokh Int. J. Mech. Sci. 234 107693 (2022)
S Karimnejad, A A Delouei and F He Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 46 6767 (2023)
A A Delouei, S Karimnejad and F He Comput. Math. Appl. 121 115 (2022)
O Pulkkinen and J Merikoski Phys. Rev. E 64 056114 (2001)
S N Majumdar, S Krishnamurthy and M Barma Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 3691 (1998)
S N Majumdar, S Krishnamurthy and M Barma J. Stats. Phys. 99 1 (2000)
R Rajesh and S N Majumdar Phys. Rev. E 63 036114 (2001)
Y Kafri, E Levine, D Mukamel, G M Schütz and R D Willmann Phys. Rev. E 68 035101 (2003)
U Basu Phys. Rev. E 94 062137 (2016)
F Ginot, I Theurkauff, F Detcheverry, C Ybert and C Cottin-Bizonne Nat. Commun. 9 1 (2018)
Acknowledgements
Financial support is acknowledged by SM for SERB project No. EMR /2017/001335. SM also acknowledges financial support and hospitality for visit to ICTP, Trieste under the Associateship program, where part of the work was done.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chacko, J., Muhuri, S. & Tripathy, G. Clustering and finite size effects in a two-species exclusion process. Indian J Phys 98, 1553–1560 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-023-02880-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-023-02880-z