Skip to main content
Log in

Variation of regional Gutenberg–Richter law parameter before and after large earthquakes in some earthquake prone zones around the world

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents variation of Gutenberg–Richter law parameter b for epicentral regions of large earthquakes in different earthquake prone areas in the world like Japan, California, Sichuan province (China), North-Eastern India, Maule (Chile), L’Aquila (Italy), Off-west-coast of New Zealand, Sumatra (2004 tsunami region) from both clustered and de-clustered catalogs. A decreasing trend of b before major earthquakes is observed in most cases and after a large event the b value shows an increasing trend. It is shown that the variation of b for foreshock and aftershock of a large event in a region also follows the same trend.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S K Chakrabarti, S K Mandal, S Sasmal, D Bhowmick, A K Choudhury and N N Patra Indian J. Phys. 84 1461 (2010)

  2. S K Chakrabarti, M Saha, R Khan, S Mandal, K Acharyya and R Saha Ind. J. Radio Space Phys. 34 314 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. P Varotsos, K Alexopoulos and M Lazaridou Tectonophysics 224 1 (1993)

  4. P Varotsos and D Miliotis J. Phys. Chem. Solids 35 927 (1974)

  5. P Varotsos and K Alexopoulos Physica Status Solidi A47 K133 (1978)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. M Lazaridou, C Varotsos, K Alexopoulos and P Varotsos J. Physics C: Solid State 18 3891 (1985)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. D Kostopoulos, P Varotsos and S Mourikis Canadian J. Phys. 53 1318 (1975)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. B Nikouravan Int. J. Fund. Phys. Sci. 2 20 (2012)

  9. S K Midya and P K Gole Indian J. Phys. 88 1 (2014)

  10. S K Midya and P Panda Pacific J. Sci. Technol. 14 586 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. S K Midya, A K Dutta and P Panda Mausam 62 245 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. S K Jain, G Panda and S K Vijay Indian J. Phys. 84 359 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. A Cao and S S Gao Geophys. Res. Lett. 29 48 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Y Tsukakoshi and K Shimazaki Earth Planets Space 60 915 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. P A Varotsos, N V Sarlis and E S Skordas Practica of Athens Academy 76 294 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. P A Varotsos, N V Sarlis and E S Skordas Acta Geophys. Polonica 50 337 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. N V Sarlis and E S Skordas, M S Lazariidou and P A Varotsos Proc. Jpn. Acad. Sci. B84 331 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S Abe, N V Sarlis and E S Skordas, H K Tanaka and P A Varotsos Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 170601 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. P A Varotsos, N V Sarlis and E S Skordas Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 12 3473 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. C H Chan, Y M Wu, T L Tseng, T L Lin and C C Chen Tectonophys. 532-535 215 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. S Kumar Geosci. Res. 3 83 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. G F Karakaisis, A S Savvaidis and C B Papazachos Pure Appl. Geophys. 160 1479 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. S S Teotia and D Kumar Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 18 111 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. S Gresta and G Patane G. Pure Appl. Geophys. (Pageoph) 121 903 (1983)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. W D Smith Nature 289 136 (1981)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. W D Smith W D Geophys. J.R. Astr. Soc. 86 815 (1986)

  27. N S Al-Arifi and S Al-Humidan Int. J. Phys. Sci. 6 8171 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  28. S Dasgupta, B Mukhopadhyay and A Bhattacharya J. Earth Syst. Sci. 116 215 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. H C Ma Acta Geophys. Sinica 21 126 (1978)

  30. B Enescu, D Enescu and K Ito Romanian Journ. Phys. 56 590 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  31. S Z Gibowicz Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 63 517 (1973)

  32. B Gutenberg and C F Richter Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 34 185 (1944)

    Google Scholar 

  33. K Aki Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. 43 237 (1965)

  34. G K Gardener and L Knopoff Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 64 1363 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  35. E Yenier, O Erdogan and S Akkar The 14th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China (2008)

  36. P Nuannin and O Kulhanek J. Earth Sci. Eng. 2 166 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  37. G A Papadopoulos, M Charalampakis, A Fokacfs and G Minadakis Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 10 19 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. M Imoto Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 43 202 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. J Henderson, I Main, P Meredith and P Sammonds J. Struct. Geo. 14 905 (1992)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank United States Geological Survey (USGS) and International Seismological Center (ISC) for making the earthquake data freely available on their websites.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. K. Midya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Midya, S.K., Gole, P.K. Variation of regional Gutenberg–Richter law parameter before and after large earthquakes in some earthquake prone zones around the world. Indian J Phys 88, 1227–1234 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-014-0588-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-014-0588-1

Keywords

PACS Nos.

Navigation