Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparative analysis of Mesonic, Baryonic and Glueball Regge trajectories

  • Published:
Indian Journal of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a comparative analysis of mesonic, baryonic and Glueball Regge trajectories based on different parameters. The different inbuilt compositions of the three seem to serve as a basis for their individual identities. We discuss features such as crossed channel forces, signature, string models and also the dependence of the slope of the mesons and baryons on the fine structure constant. We infer that inspite of various inherent similarities, these three Regge trajectories have some distinctive features which serve as a basis for their identification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T Regge Nuovo Cimento 14 951 (1959)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. T Regge Nuovo Cimento 18 947 (1960)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. A E Inopin hep-ph/0110160

  4. G F Chew and S C Frautschi Phys. Rev. Letters 8 41 (1962)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. S C Frautschi Regge Poles and S-Matrix Theory (New York: W. A. Benjamin) (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  6. D Kahana, K Maung Maung and J W Norbury Phys. Rev. D48 3408 (1993)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. S Godfrey and N Isgur Phys. Rev. D32 189 (1985)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. E Di Salvo, L Kondratyuk and P Saracco hep-ph/9411309

  9. W K Tang Phys. Rev. D48 2019 (1993)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. http://pdg.ibl.gov

  11. N Isgur and J Paton Phys. Rev. D31 2910 (1985)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. A B Kaidalov hep-ph/0103011v1

  13. J R Forshaw and D A Ross Quantum Chromodynamics and the Pomeron (Cambridge Lecture Notes in Physics: Cambridge University Press) (1997)

  14. P v Landshoff hep-ph/0108156

  15. D Akers hep-ph/0309075

  16. Alfred Tang and J W Norbury Phys. Rev. D62 016006 (2002)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. C B Chiu Annul Review of Nuclear Science 22 255 (1972)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. P D B Collins An Introduction to Regge Theory and High Energy Physics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  19. J Kontros, K Kontros and A Lengyel hep-ph/0006141v2

  20. S Mandelstam Phys. Rev. 112 1344 (1958)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. M H Mac Gregor Nuovo Cimento A103 983 (1990)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. M H Mac Gregor Phys. Rev. D9 1259 (1974)

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. M H Mac Gregor Phys. Rev. D10 850 (1974)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. A O Barut Atoms with magnetic charges as models of hadrons in Topic in Modern Physics, edited by Wesley E Brittin and Halis Odabasi (Boulder: Colorado Associated University Press) (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  25. A O Barut Physical Review D3 1747 (1971)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. T Sawada hep-ph/0004080

  27. C Goebel, D La Course and M G Olsson Phys. Rev. D41 2917 (1990)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. C Olson, M G Olsson and D La Course Phys. Rev. D49 4675 (1994)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. M G Olsson, S Veseli and K Williams Phys. Rev. D53 4006 (1996); T Allen, M G Olsson and S Veseli ibid 62 094021 (2000)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. L D Soloviev Theor. Math. Phys. 116 914 (1998); Phys. Rev. D58 035005 (1998); 61 015009 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. G S Sharov Phys. Rew. D58 114009 (1998)

  32. G S Sharov Phys. Rev. At. Nucl. 62 1705 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  33. G S Sharov Phys. Rev. D62 094015 (2000)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. A Inopin and G S Sharov hep-ph/9905499

  35. G S Sharov hep-ph/0612373

  36. L D Soloviev Theor. Math. Phys. 106 174 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. L D Soloviev hep-ph/0006010

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Kumaun University, Nainital, 263 002, Uttrakhand, India

    Navjot Hothi & Shuchi Bisht

Authors
  1. Navjot Hothi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shuchi Bisht
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuchi Bisht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hothi, N., Bisht, S. A comparative analysis of Mesonic, Baryonic and Glueball Regge trajectories. Indian J Phys 83, 339–348 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-009-0124-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-009-0124-x

Keywords

PACS No

Search

Navigation